Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Stop fighting over AP. Replace it!

Stop fighting over AP. Replace it!

Last updated on: January 5, 2016 at 10:44 am by Jane the Actuary

Stop fighting over AP. Replace it! 2016-01-05T10:44:51-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

test-taking, from WIkimedia Commons (public domain)

Here’s the context that had me thinking about this:

The AP US History battle is not over. Stanley Kurtz at the National Review has been reporting on the changes going on at the College Board, in which they have been creating a new set of learning objectives, and covered content, for the exam, with a decided leftward tilt, which have prompted substantial dissent. Recent reports had been that the College Board had conceded the point, and made the curriculum even-handed, but a post from Monday says this, well, window-dressing, basically.

Now, for the first time, AP European history, and soon AP U.S. Government and Politics, AP World history, and every other AP course will be governed by a lengthy and controlling curricular framework issued by the College Board, with revised textbooks and teacher-training materials to match. Before the College Board decided to issue detailed curricula for all of its courses, its de facto monopoly over AP testing didn’t much matter. Now, by moving to take substantial control over the content of all AP courses, the College Board is effectively putting a national curriculum in place. That curriculum leans left.

The APUSH changes announced this summer do little to alter that fact. I’ve argued (here and here) that the APUSH revisions amount largely to cutting the most controversial statements, while retaining the fundamental leftist thrust of the guidelines.

Paul Mirengoff at the Powerlineblog, sheds more light on the situation, in the form of a letter from a reader who was involved in teaching and grading AP courses/exams:

[The College Board] makes money by having students take exams. It is a rather corrupt bargain. School administrators make their schools look good by claiming “X % of our students take AP exams.” [The College Board] makes money by having more students take exams. Taxpayers foot the bill.

Thus a huge number of students take the exams without any reasonable chance of passing. I would say that 75% of students in past years should never have taken the US History exam. But that’s not good for business.

Over the past few years, [The College Board] has subtly pressured graders to increase student scores. This year the pressure is no longer subtle. Graders have been told to “give students the benefit of the doubt” and “set the bar very low.” (Those are actual quotes.)

But that’s not all. The whole structure of the exam’s scoring has been changed specifically, I believe, to increase scores. The old exam, for all its flaws (and NAS notwithstanding, there was always a lot of political bias toward the left) tested content and it was surprisingly rigorous by today’s standards of education. That’s why so few actually passed the exam. . . .

In short, being factually correct, understanding the context of the documents, etc., isn’t being graded (though some of us are violating that injunction). The exam has gone from a history exam to an exam that tests pedagogy, from “does this student know something about U.S. history?” to “does this student know how to take a test?”

In light of this, is continuing to try to reform the AP system really the right thing to do?

Why not, instead, try to break the monopoly?

How?

Three choices (choose one or all):

1. Develop competitor exams,

2. Develop online module-based learning, and

3. Develop dual-enrollment programs.

None of these are easy. All of these require political action at the local level, demanding changes from school boards (who are likely perfectly happy with the situation, especially because unions would balk at anything that removes a student from a classroom) as well as at the state level, depending on the state.

What would a competitor exam look like? It’d be challenging to implement, because you’d need buy-in from universities — perhaps someplace like Hillsdale could take the lead with an exam, with instructional materials. Could they offer transferable credit for the exam? I don’t know. And who would be the customers? Individual students, or whole classrooms at “rebellious” schools?

What would online learning look like? Again, some university would have to create the system, offer transferable credit, and would have to do so at a price that’s competitive with the $100 or so for taking an AP test. What’s the appeal? Moving away from assessment based on a single test. Shortly after I finished my actuarial exams, the Society of Actuaries moved to an online module system for some of its exams. Rather than passing a “course” (as they call them) by means of a single 4 or 6 hour exam, for some topics, anyway, one now works through instructional material on- and offline, with multiple assessments throughout the course, as well as a final assessment. Now, I don’t know how this works in practice, but the SOA seems to think it’s a better approach for the topics they’ve converted to this method. In the high school context, of course, no one wants to do extra work, but this could be designed for a classroom setting.

And what would dual-enrollment programs look like? This is by far my preferred choice. My high school district is implementing a dual-enrollment program, in partnership with the local community college, and alongside other school districts in the community college’s attendance area, but unfortunately, they’ve chosen a disappointing set of classes: two math and one science class for non-majors, a speech class, an art appreciation class. With respect to all of these, they’ve chosen classes which would count as electives/general education requirements only, and are not prerequisites for later study, so there’s little risk to the student if the rigor and instruction isn’t quite what it should be. I was unable to figure out what the final of the six pilot program classes, composition, was meant to be about — would this truly be a replacement for an AP English Composition class + exam, and produce the equivalent transferable credit?

A well-designed dual-enrollment program ought to take every subject for which there is an AP level class, and replace it with a dual-enrollment offering, in which the high school teacher is sufficiently qualified to teach the same curriculum, and evaluate the students with the same metrics, as their counterparts at the local community college or other sponsoring institution. AP history – replaced! AP calculus – gone! AP composition, biology, etc. – all transformed into dual-enrollment classes of sufficient rigor to truly transfer to any institution and prepare the student for higher-level work.

Now, I fully expect that the immediate reaction of the administration would be: why? Why not keep the exams? Setting up dual enrollment would be more work. But it would benefit the students. As it is, they study furiously for an exam in May, with lots of “teaching to the test” and as much learning about the particular nature of that test as the subject itself. Then they’re rewarded more for their ability to test-take in high-stakes circumstances than they are for their subject knowledge. (And, yes, I’m one of those who’s immensely skilled at test-taking, and it’s carried me pretty far.) Then, after the exam is over, they goof off until the end of the year, because the exams occur in the first two weeks of May. And universities are skeptical enough of the results that there’s no consistency (other than state mandates such as Illinois) in what result is required to transfer, and whether the class/exam is truly sufficient to allow the advanced placement its name promises. In reading the various articles about AP I’ve read plenty of comments about kids who took AP math/science exams but were not truly prepared, and struggled and/or failed at the next level class.

Having said all this, yes, I ought to reach out to my local school board and prod them to take that next step. Will I? Well, let’s see. . .

Uncategorized

dual enrollment

high school

Previous Post

August 19, 2015

If you're Singerian about "personhood" will even the latest video perturb you?

Next Post

August 21, 2015 Foodblogging: the secret to crock-pot chicken!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Jesus say to Lazarus to raise him?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Awake! Live again! Lazarus, come out! Be healed!