Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Sorry, but neither party fits the bill

Last updated on: August 14, 2015 at 7:54 am   by Jane the Actuary

Sorry, but neither party fits the bill 2015-08-14T07:54:42-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(A guest post by my husband, er, Mike the Actuary)

We hear it every day: The American people are fed up with politics; they don’t feel properly represented by politicians.

There are many reasons provided to explain this phenomenon.  For me, the main issue is that neither party’s agenda lines ups very well with my own personal belief system.  More precisely, I feel that the straight line classification, left vs. right, liberal vs. conservative, Democrat vs. Republican, just doesn’t work for me.  There are way too many factors in play and reducing it to a single dimension isn’t doing the trick for me.  I wonder if I’m alone, or if that’s part of a broader problem.

Let me explain.

First, on fiscal matters. I would happily label myself a “fiscal conservative” in the sense that I strongly believe in maintaining tight controls over government spending.  Mainly that’s because I strongly believe that maintaining the long-term fiscal health of a country directly impacts its ability to act and ultimately its relevance. The federal budget deficit is way too high, as is the federal debt.  And of course that doesn’t even reflect all the deficits and debt at the state and local level.

I am appalled when politicians—left or right—spend money as if it grows on trees.  I don’t care if excessive spending occurs on social programs, on “entitlements”  or on some fancy high-tech defense system.  At the same time, I am equally appalled by Grover Norquist’s Taxpayer Protection Pledge that pretends that taxes are always too high, no matter what, and which limits (or even impedes) the ability to reach important compromises.

I don’t mind if high earners pay high taxes, for as long as the money is truly needed in the sense that the money collected is used in a responsible manner.  At the same time, I also believe that spending doesn’t always have to go up.  There are times when spending has to come down, and there shouldn’t be any budget items that are declared to be off limits on ideological or populist grounds.

So where does that put me?  I don’t know.

Next, on social matters.  Again, I mostly think of myself as “conservative”.  I liked the term “compassionate conservative” (although I don’t know if that’s been hijacked in some fashion).  I’m pro-life, but that includes all life, i.e., encompasses an anti-death-penalty stance.  I believe that marriage is between a man and a woman, but support gay and lesbian rights.  We definitely need to do a lot of work to improve race relationships, but I oppose notions of “white privilege”.  And while certain types of support for the African American community are in order, I see the decline of family values, and specifically the decline of traditional families, to be a significant contributor to the challenges in those communities.  But those aren’t symptoms, those are causes, and we should not hesitate to point that out.

How about some other policy issues?  I’ve generally been supportive of Obamacare, or at least of some form of universal health care.  I find it to be mostly a sign of the dysfunction of the current American political climate that so much effort is spent on trying to dismantle Obamacare rather than on improving it.

Social Security, or pension systems more generally, need to be sustainable. Again, we don’t have the luxury to declare them to be sacrosanct.  Better to make tough choices (up to and including cuts) now than to risk apocalypse later.

Education is a tough one.  It’s too easy to constantly advocate “more investment in education” but I don’t have a good position here.  I do know, however, that the trajectory of college cost is not sustainable.  I have grave reservations when I see tuition outpace inflation year after year even if financial aid seems to be expanding at the same time.

Lastly, on foreign policy.  Mostly, what I’ve been missing is a position that advocates America consistently occupying the moral high ground.  If America wants to be seen as the beacon for Freedom all around the world, then it must act the part.  That doesn’t mean going around apologizing which all too often just comes across as a weak plea to “please love me.”  Make no mistake, we should act from a position of strength.  It’s just that we should marry our undeniable strength with a lot of compassion.  It means having a clear sense of what’s good and right and then implementing a consistent foreign policy that follows that line—even if it means accepting some disadvantages.  It means that we need to be very careful before involving our milliary, and that once involved, our military should act with restraint.  It also means that we should treat even our enemies with some respect.  No water boarding or other “enhanced interrogation techniques”.  Ever.  It also means that we need to be careful what regimes to support, and how we interact with and talk about regimes that are clearly not aligned with our moral belief system.  A perspective of “my enemy’s enemy is my friends” doesn’t qualify, nor does easy access to oil.  Lastly, it means that peaceful measures of foreign aid should be emphasized.  Wouldn’t it be great if America was known around the world more for the Peace Corps than the Marine Corps?

I hope I’ve made my point.  Do you see my dilemma? What’s your perspective?

Jane here.  If you want to talk about Americans’ disengagement from politics, consider that you’re generally stuck with few choices — and the more that Social Issues, well, are issues (who would have considered gay marriage an issue a generation ago, or assisted suicide?), the more difficult this becomes.  The bottom line:  politics isn’t a straight line.  If you expect everyone to just  find our spots on this line, no wonder we’re not cooperating.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



August 14, 2015

From the library: Under the Same Sky, by Joseph Kim

Next Post



August 15, 2015 Two quotes on violence


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Ecclesiastes 2, what did the author try in search of meaning?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Worship, prayer, and sacrifice Fasting, solitude, and silence Pleasure, work, and wisdom Teaching, healing, and prophecy

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

Jesus Was Not an Aristotelian

Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

What a Stop Sign Can Teach Us About...

How to Make a Decision When You Can't Hear God Main point:...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube