Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

The difference between Baby Body-Part Harvesting and autopsies

Last updated on: January 22, 2016 at 8:11 am   by Jane the Actuary

The difference between Baby Body-Part Harvesting and autopsies 2016-01-22T08:11:39-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(or, removal of organs for transplantation purposes):

I shouldn’t even need to say this, but I’m hearing in multiple places that even though it’s shocking to hear Planned Parenthood officials speak so casually about what they’re doing — talking about hearts and livers over lunch, aiming for “less crunchy” techniques while crunching on a salad — we have to understand that medical professionals do things which, taken out of context, would appear shocking and really aren’t.  Autopsies, for instance, can be brutal in they manner in which they cut open a body and would appear horrific (in fact, weren’t permitted for most of the middle ages out of a belief that it’s disrespectful to the individual) to an outsider.  A doctor preparing organs for transplant cuts into a person and takes out a heart, or a liver, or what-have-you.  And these doctors need to distance themselves, and over time come to speak in ways that you and I would find shockingly indifferent to what they’re doing.

But:

in these cases, the doctor is dealing with a body that’s already dead.

In abortion, the doctor is actively killing a living being, via the rationale that it’s not yet a “person.”

Have we forgotten this difference?

Now, yes, there are violations of medical ethics and, likely, violations of the law, as well:  it’s highly likely, but also likely not provable, that PP is charging whatever the market will bear in providing their specimens, rather than diligently determining their costs and passing them on; and PP officials have spoken quite clearly of changing the method of the abortion in order to obtain better specimens, though, again, whether it’s provable in any specific instance that there’s a material difference is another question.

But the bigger issue is this:

Everyone likes to think of abortions being done early enough that there is no heart, or liver, that could be identifiable.  And everyone likes to imagine that if a late-term abortion, past the point when body parts are identifiable, is needed, it’s only for the most tragic of reasons (rather than, almost always, for the same financial or personal reasons as earlier abortions).  These videos highlight what’s actually going on, and emphasize the fact that the abortion provider, and the industry, view the unborn child as, for all intents and purposes, already dead, and are indifferent to the fact that what they’re doing is killing.

Yeah.  That’s it.

Except:

I do try to read the sites to get a left-wing perspective:  The Atlantic, Slate, etc.  And I have to admit:  I haven’t yet read someone saying, “I’m prochoice, but these videos upset me and cause my to question what I believe and/or remind me that I believe there are limits to what’s moral.”  The closest was that Ann Althouse called the video “harrowing” but provided no further commentary.

Instead, all the standard progressive opinionators (e.g., The New York Times) opine that Planned Parenthood is doing nothing illegal, and is instead doing a Good Deed by furthering medical research, and is being unjustly harassed.  (Whether research using fetuses has actually made a difference in “H.I.V., hepatitis, congenital heart defects, retinal degeneration and Parkinson’s”, as cited by the NYT, and, specifically in ways that couldn’t have been done without it, I’m doubtful about, but haven’t researched it — and in any case, it’s irrelevant; bolstering the ethic rightness of abortion by citing fetal tissue research is no better than judging Mengele’s experiments as right or wrong based on whether they produced cures.)

And how are the non-pundit prochoicers reacting?  The ones reading the news, not writing it?  I don’t know.  Trouble is, I doubt that these revelations will have moved the needle on what they believe to be right and wrong, because of the fact that the mainstream news outlets are reporting the videos with a defense baked into the “news” reporting.

Uncategorized

abortion

Planned Parenthood

Previous Post



July 21, 2015

Marriage and debt: score one for Atlantic readers

Next Post



July 22, 2015 How f'ed up is Illinois? Let me count the ways. . .


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was crucified and rose again after three days?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jesus Paul Moses John the Baptist

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

The ERA of 1972 no longer exists in...

Jane the Actuary

Family

What's A Pro-Life Illinoisan To do?

Jane the Actuary

Family

The Violinist vs. the Castaway, and an attempt...

Jane the Actuary

Family

On the end of Roe, and why I'm...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Problem with False Prophets

Miller’s Station UMC| 10/18/26| Anchor Verse: Jeremiah 23: 1, 9-23   I...

Emotion in Early Christianity by Andrew Crislip

Andrew Crislip’s Emotion in Early Christianity examines an often overlooked dimension of...

16 Spiritual Touchstones for a More Grounded Life

  After decades of spiritual study, here are 16 principles I try...

Catholic Evangelization: Sharing Your Faith Every Day

Welcome back to the Graceful Awakening mini-series called, “From Faith to Mission.” ...

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube