The 100,000 Opportunities Initiative

Last updated on: July 14, 2015 at 11:13 pm by Jane the Actuary

The 100,000 Opportunities Initiative 2015-07-14T23:13:22-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As reported by Tuesday’s Chicago Tribune:

Chicago will be the kickoff site for the 100,000 Opportunities Initiative, a new coalition of big businesses hoping to provide jobs or training for disadvantaged 16- to 24-year-olds.

The initiative, which includes companies like Starbucks, CVS and Wal-Mart, comes as teens continue to be displaced from entry-level jobs by older workers and college graduates, despite the rebound in the nation’s job market. . . .

The coalition’s goal is to provide apprenticeships, internships, training, and part- and full-time jobs for at least 100,000 youths and young adults nationally by 2018. It’s targeting those who “face systemic barriers to jobs and education,” according to its announcement.

During the next 18 months, the initiative expects to hire at least 1,000 youths and young adults in the Chicago area alone.

The website for the initiate is here.

Interestingly, Megan McArdle has a piece today about speeches by Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton which announce they’ll increase economic growth by getting more people into the labor force: for Jeb, labor force dropouts; for Hillary, stay-at-home mothers. In both cases, McArdle says, they’re putting the cart before the horse: the jobs have to exist before people can fill them.

And here, too: yes, it’s important to provide job training to young people who lack it, and for employers to give them a chance, but where are these 100,000 jobs supposed to come from?

Is the training meant to make these teens and young adults attractive workers, newly able to win the job over the over-educated college grads and the no-longer-as-nimble older workers (who should go back to being happy with their Social Security checks)?

Are these employers planning on hiring 2 people to work at a more relaxed pace, where only 1 efficient worker is needed, forgoing some profits to further a greater social goal? Or, heck, perhaps 5 workers instead of 4, and slowing down a prior speed-up, or removing some self-checkout lanes, or adding back baggers?

Is there a genuine assumption that the job market will open up and college grads will go back to higher-level work?

Or is this all feel-good, and good for the corporate PR?

Uncategorized

Previous Post

July 14, 2015

True or False?: "The world would be a more peaceful place if. . ."; plus: what I don't understand

Next Post

July 15, 2015 New study: between 5% and 64% of women regret their abortion

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which official opposed Nehemiah's wall-building and sent open letters to Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sanballat Geshem Haggai Tobiah