Responding to Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Last updated on: May 19, 2015 at 8:26 am by Jane the Actuary

Responding to Ayaan Hirsi Ali 2015-05-19T08:26:19-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve been sitting on this for a while, after hastily writing up my summary of Heretic before returning the book to the library.

In the first place, it seems a bit silly to say that Ali is persuasive, since I was predisposed to believe what she wrote and it was in line with my own thinking anyway, having, back in January (pre-patheos) been on a bit of a kick of writing about Islam, from wildly speculating about how a “moderate Muslim” might reconcile the “sword verses” to a belief in peace, to my post on the Jewish Enlightenment as a model (I thought this was a pretty good post, and was peeved that I couldn’t get any traction from it), as well as my more recent summary of a book by a Modifying Muslim, to use Ali’s terminology.

But Ali’s point is this: the problem with Islam is not simply the “sword verses” but several big, all-encompassing elements of the religion: the demand that the Qur’an and other founding documents must be interpreted in line with one or another of the historical schools of thought, firmly in place a millennium ago; the insistence that the Qur’an is, in every last word, the word of God precisely transcribed, with no room for historical analysis; the demand that the dictates of Islam be all-encompassing and prescribe all aspects of one’s life; and the dangerous focus on the afterlife and the fatalism about this life — plus, of course, the belief that Islam should properly dominate everyone and everywhere.

Now, that may not be how Islam plays out in the daily lives of every last one of its adherents; I’ve read that in Malaysia and Indonesia, Islam is more “moderate,” though I don’t know exactly how that plays out. (Maybe something for later reading?) But these core ideas are fundamental to Islam, at least as it exists in the Middle East and Africa, and as it’s been transplanted to Europe and the Americas.

We in the West tend, with our desire for ecumenism, to believe that all religions are basically the same, that the dual commands to love God and love your neighbor, and the idea that God loves us, his creation, are not just core to Christianity but to all religions. When Obama gave his Prayer Breakfast speech, I observed that his denial that ISIS is “Islamic” seemed to be this sort of reasoning: “religions are about love, ISIS isn’t loving, therefore ISIS isn’t a religion but something else, and if ISIS isn’t any kind of religion, then it can’t be Islamic.” That’s nonsense. The core idea of Islam is not “God is love” — it’s very name itself communicates that the core idea is “God demands your submission.”

And, to the best of my understanding, it is key that violent jihad is not just some wild idea that’s quite disconnected from Islam, but, to the contrary, the idea of peaceful coexistence has been, you might say, grafted onto Islam only very recently, and without much success. In my “Jewish Enlightement” post, I link to an article profiling Muslim religious leaders in Chicago trying to combat the appeal of extremists, but they really appear to have have few tools at their disposal other than “don’t join ISIS because we said so.”

But bypassing all this:

Ali profiles reformers and expresses optimism that they will ultimately convert their comrades. In the same way as the developers of Reform Judaism said, the religious laws of the Torah and Talmud are particular to a given time and place, but “Central and changeless is the belief in the one and holy God, who is to be served through righteousness and mercy.” (The latter is a quote from the book I referenced in the prior post.) — in that same way, these new Islamic reformers begin with a fundamental belief about God as Good, and are willing to either discard, or reinterpret (with alternate translation of Arabic words with multiple meanings, or with placing certain texts as applicable only to the fixed circumstances they were written in — e.g., the Sword Verses as a sort of pep talk never intended to encourage literal wholesale slaughter) any text that doesn’t conform.

Which is all well and good. But the challenge for us who are not Muslim is this: what role, if any, can we play? And what role should the government play? Ali suggests that the government put more effort into supporting reformers, in the same way as we supported anti-communists. And it is clear that Obama, and Bush before him were too eager to accept into the “moderate Muslim” fold anyone who was willing to claim that they “opposed terrorism” without any due skepticism of what the so-called moderates had in mind. Ali, indeed, profiles some of these individuals who were welcomed into the “moderate” fold despite words and deeds demonstrating quite the opposite. (I’d give you specifics but the book is back at the library now.) And at the same time, neither Obama now nor Bush then, were willing to confront Middle Eastern governments for the violations of human rights that imprisoned reformers there, and certainly prevent reform movements from taking root — Bush being concerned about maintaining Saudi Arabia’s support and Obama with blinders on or simple indifference with respect to Iran.

So it seems clear that support for these reformers ought to be part and parcel of support for human rights abroad.

But beyond that, given that we have all manner of community outreach programs for Muslim immigrant communities in the United States, should we be more demanding in what qualifies one as a “moderate Muslim” in terms of how the grant money is distributed?

Here’s the problem: how far can we go before crossing a line, into religious discrimination?

Hillary Clinton’s statement that for women to enjoy full freedom, via “reproductive health care,”

deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed

rightly upset conservatives; so, too, the efforts of the gay rights movement to convince Christian denominations to eliminate gay sex from the “sin list” (see this old post).

Much as I’d like for Muslims to adopt a more “enlightened” form of their religion, I don’t know what the right role is for non-Muslims to play.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 18, 2015

News flash: History doesn't care

Next Post

May 19, 2015 Walker, Rubio, Cruz, Jindal -- help me out here!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the Christian teaching about humility?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Value others above yourself Demand honor Be proud always Boast often