Legislating AP credit: Higher Education bubble sign or . . .

Last updated on: May 24, 2015 at 7:52 am by Jane the Actuary

Legislating AP credit: Higher Education bubble sign or . . . 2015-05-24T07:52:37-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Not long ago, I wrote about a plan afoot in my local school district/community college district to expand dual-enrollment classes from a few specialized vocational-type classes (CNA, computer networking) to a set of classes intended to meet general education requirements, the rigor of which I found questionable: Speech Communication, Introduction to Visual Art, Physical Science (for non-majors), and two math courses for non-STEM majors, each of which appeared to be no more rigorous than any standard 12th grade math course. I had said at the time that, though I didn’t like the application, I liked the overall concept, and would like to see, instead of AP classes, true college-rigor classes taught via dual enrollment* so that success doesn’t hinge on a single exam: for composition and history, for math, and for the sciences, where, in particular, if you look at lists of what scores colleges accept, the need to ensure that a student truly understands the material and is ready to move on to the next level, means that colleges are much more demanding about what level score they accept for credit. I subtitled this post “Higher Education Bubble Sign or Reynold’s Law” because of Glenn Reynolds/Instapundit’s observation that giving someone the trappings of middle-classness doesn’t give them the abilities and the traits that allow them to succeed.

(*Tangential comment: by comparison, German bachelor degree programs are three years long, because the expectation is that the gymnasium coursework is rigorous enough that the typical American freshman year, consisting of a series of introductory and general-education courses, isn’t necessary. But that’s another post.)

But apparently the Illinois state legislature doesn’t see it this way. According to this morning’s Tribune (see here for non-subscriber link):

College standards for granting credit for AP tests vary widely. The tests are scored on a 5-point scale, but while some colleges and universities will award credit for scores as low as 2, others require the top score of 5 in certain subjects, according to the College Board, which administers the program. At some schools, the standards vary by subject, while the University of Illinois has different thresholds for different campuses.

To standardize the criteria, lawmakers are considering passing a law to require public universities and colleges in Illinois to give course credit for scores of 3 or better.

The idea met resistance from higher education officials who feared it would lower academic standards, and a similar bill died in the legislature last year. But this year, the proposal appears to be gaining momentum.

The state House passed the measure by an overwhelming, bipartisan 90-22 vote. Last week, the Senate higher education committee approved the bill unanimously. It is expected to go before the Senate for a vote this week.

There’s a nifty graphic at the link, which shows the score requirement at each of the Illinois public universities and Chicago area community colleges; it is true that the most prevalent requirement is a 3, but not consistently.

Universities, of course, aren’t pleased with this state intervention, and are trying to at least modify the bill to allow them to grant elective credit, rather than directly substituting for specific requirements, especially when a class is a prerequisite and students are at risk of failing the next class in the sequence without adequate preparation.

And it’s my understanding that there are some universities, Ivy League ones in particular, that don’t accept any AP credit, whether this is because they think no AP class is of sufficient rigor, ever, or because they simply don’t want to lose tuition revenue, I don’t know, and, in any case, I think it’s improbable that Illinois state colleges have the latter, tuition-collection concern in mind.

What it all comes down to is this: it’s foolish to take away from universities the discretion to determine that for any given AP test, based on their evaluation, a higher score is needed to grant the proposed credit — that is, if a university education is about learning rather than just accruing credits. On the other hand, if it is just about the credits, then hooray for the legislature!

Sunday morning update: Hi, instapundit readers! Here’s a comment from Glenn’s link, from user BobRog:

I’ve said before that the key weakness in GR’s writing on education is his failure to confront the problem of evaluating student learning. It’s the hardest problem in education, and the internet has NOT made it significantly easier. The AP is a huge national attempt to do evaluation. If it is a scam, then that’s a big problem for those who think that education can be fundamentally transformed by online courses. Unless you have a good way to evaluate student learning, all education is just fancy show and tell.

One thing that occurs to me that could help is to break AP exams up into much smaller chunks; that way, a student’s overall performance can be evaluated much more comprehensively, and you can know which “3s” are true 3s vs. 4s with nerves or 2s with a good test-taking day. And, in principle, exam-based evaluation is a good thing; after all, I landed in my field due to the opportunity to get a credential by exam-taking, even if my university course of study was entirely different. (Remind me to write about that . . . )

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 19, 2015

Minimum wage update

Next Post

May 21, 2015 Readers: your turn

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which was the day that God ended His creation and rested?

Select your answer to see how you score.

On the 6th day On the 5th day On the 7th day He never rested