Update on Indiana – and a question

Last updated on: April 3, 2015 at 6:58 am by Jane the Actuary

Update on Indiana – and a question 2015-04-03T06:58:53-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

First of all, the Indiana legislature revised its legislation yesterday with an amendment “that, while not outlawing anti-gay discrimination, clarified that the religious freedom law does not authorize such discrimination,” which Governor Pence signed into law, according to the New York Times. The actual text is here, and the key elements are that (a) this law is neither an authorization to discriminate on the basis of a protected category, including sexual orientation, nor may it be used as a defense against a civil complaint, except (b) for a church “or other religious nonprofit organization or society” or a minister “when the individual is engaged in a religious or affilated educational function of the church or other nonprofit religious organization or society.”

So, in other words, back to square one — except that Indiana doesn’t have a law specifically providing protection against nondiscrimination based on sexual orientation, so strictly speaking the law doesn’t mandate wedding-service providers to provide their services to all comers, so much as say that, if another law, or a judge based on application of current law, does so, then this law provides no recourse. And what’s more, the narrow protection for ministers seems explicitly to say that if you’re a freelance wedding officiant, this protection doesn’t apply to you.

In the meantime, Memories Pizza has now taken in $500,000 via a gofundme website (not established by them but by people affiliated with the Dana Loesch Show. So, we’re good here, right? The Left’s current spin seems to be that they’re just a bunch of crybabies in closing because of threats of arson or worse, because the threats weren’t credible. But beyond this: are they at risk legally? Most likely they will, upon reopening, face “testers” requesting, in fact, gay-wedding catering; will they be subject to state fines based on current law, or a judge’s finding?

I suppose the bigger question is this, one I don’t have the resources available to answer:

So far, there’s the florist, the baker, and the wedding photographer. The florist has been ordered to create gay-wedding floral arrangements in the future, with a fine still pending (update here). The baker in question is at risk of a $150,000 fine due to the “mental anguish” of the denied couple (update here), even after they closed down their business. The Supreme Court refused to hear the wedding photographer’s appeal last year (see here) but I can’t figure out what the practical consequences were — the $7,000 fine was reportedly waived, but was she allowed to continue in business, or was her business shuttered, or was she told that this was the equivalent of a “warning shot” and next time she’d be made to suffer?

That’s three cases.

Which either means that every other wedding provider who might have objected has been cowed into providing services, or that virtually all gay and lesbian couples are respectful of those with beliefs opposing gay marriage and/or select providers who have expressed support, or that other cases have found in favor of the provider, and these three are the exception. I’d like to say that it’s the second of these explanations — but the anger being poured forth at Memories Pizza and at Indiana more generally, and the knee-jerk reaction by politicians, pundits, and corporations that, of course, Christian wedding-service providers are hateful if they hesitate, makes this unlikely.

Which leaves the question unanswered: why only these three cases?

Uncategorized

Previous Post

April 2, 2015

Legislating morality, 2015 edition

Next Post

April 3, 2015 Triduum Update

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem after the exile?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nehemiah Ezra Zerubbabel Joshua