Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Needs and wants, 2015 edition

Last updated on: April 17, 2015 at 7:59 am   by Jane the Actuary

Needs and wants, 2015 edition 2015-04-17T07:59:15-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday I listened to a training session at work in which the presenter described the work being done in another part of the company on helping clients encourage their employees to save more for retirement; one interesting thing that more employers are doing, apparently, is moving beyond retirement savings to provide encouragement, online tools, and in-house sessions on money management more generally.

And I started thinking about this:  whether wages have stagnated, regressed, or proceeded to climb depends on one’s interpretation of the data:  how you slice and dice by education level or earnings percentile, what metric you use for inflation, and so on.  But one thing is true:  the government develops inflation metrics based on price changes for a “basket of goods” that’s supposed to represent typical spending.  (One of these days I’ll look up the details and unpack them.)  There are some very real ways, though, in which that “basket of goods” has not just changed over time, but gotten bigger:  our expectations of what constitute “basic living expenses” and “spending needed to be middle class” have changed quite a bit over time, and this is a significant impediment in Americans saving for retirement, or savings at all.

So I thought I’d compile a list of these types of changes, and ask you to brainstorm with me on this, or collect comments anyway, until I have time to really dig through the available data.

You can get a cheap, “dumb” phone and a by-the-minutes plan for a fairly low price, and, if you’re single, replace your landline with it. But more and more, even the poor “need” a smartphone.  And I don’t really know how likely poor families are to have a computer with internet service, but we’re told that this, too, is a need, not a want.  Heck, my high schooler is expected to do his homework on his school-issued iPad, with the instruction to the substantial number of Mexican immigrants (the parent meeting at orientation was twice as long as it otherwise would have taken because everything was translated into Spanish) being to stay after school, then go to the library, and, after they close, or the McDonalds or Panera as needed after school closes down for the day.

Bottom line is that for most of us, internet service of various types has been transformed from a “want” into a “need” — and thinking about that left me wondering what other transformations have occurred.  At the level of “what you need to be middle class,” many, probably.  The size of one’s house, to be sure, but even the expectation that one lives in a single family house, and that to live in an apartment is a marker of failure.  Air conditioning is now a need.  The “need” to spend on activities for the kids — it happens fairly often that in stories of unemployment hardships, the parents struggle mightily to maintain the travel soccer expenses.  The “need” for more clothes (at least, judging from the very small closets in our first house, built in 1946), for a health club membership.  Heck, even in terms of food, more and more people feel they “need” out-of-season fresh produce (and more of it), organics, a better cut of meat than grandmother’s pot roast, and so on — not to mention the “need” to eat out more often than past generations.

Which all leaves me wondering:  has this been quantified?  Time to hit google, I suppose.  But in the meantime:  your thoughts?

Uncategorized

Previous Post



April 16, 2015

From the library: The Great Beanie Baby Bubble, by Zac Bissonnette

Next Post



April 17, 2015 We don't need no stinkin' qualifications


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the outcome of Sennacherib's army attacking Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

They won The city fell They captured Hezekiah Destroyed by an angel

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

'You Can See Everything': A Film Without a...

If you're looking to find the hero in the strange and riveting...

Westminister Abbey-- Part Two

One can get either depressed or impressed by walking around on the...

Theodore Dwight Weld: Evangelical Poster Boy to Drop...

Last time I discussed the spiritual crisis that engulfed Angelina Grimké in...

Jesus and the Law of Moses: An Interview...

It is my pleasure to interview Paul Sloan on his recent book,...

How Does Ặnāvâ Connect Katie Zacharia & Georgia?

This weekend, the big news has been the sudden departure of Trump’s...

The Woman We Remember by Her Wound

Śūrpaṇakhā Had a Heart Desire, humiliation, and the woman behind a turning...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube