From the library: The Smartest Kids in the World, and how they got that way, by Amanda Ripley

Last updated on: March 10, 2015 at 7:54 am by Jane the Actuary

From the library: The Smartest Kids in the World, and how they got that way, by Amanda Ripley 2015-03-10T07:54:42-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

By Raysonho @ Open Grid Scheduler / Grid Engine (Own work) [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

Yeah, I’d been meaning to read this one for a while, and now I’ve got to get this summary written before returning the book to the library. (New readers: this is one of the nerdier things I do, as I figure that if I write up little summaries of books I’ve read, I won’t forget what they’re about later.)

Who are the Smartest Kids in the World? Ripley refers to kids from the countries that have top scores on the PISA international student assessment tests, tests which are designed to measure not rote learning but critical thinking skills. Here organizing device is to chronicle, side-by-side, the experiences of three American exchange students in these countries, along with more general background on the school systems. The countries: top-scores Finland and Korea, and up-and-comer Poland.

(Are these the actual top scorers? Here are the most recent PISA scores, in PDF form, or excel (click on the link following “chapter 1” to download the file). These countries are still among the top — Ripley excludes China (which only tests kids from Shanghai, Hong Kong, and Macau, so not representative of the country) and Singapore and non-democratic countries in general — though now Switzerland, the Netherlands, and Estonia have moved ahead of Finland in math. In any case, the United States is decidedly at the middle of the pack: 33rd out of 61 for math, somewhat better in reading at 21st.)

Anyway, here’s what I flagged from the book:

p. 64. U.S. spends considerably more on technology than these “high performing” schools. “However, there was little evidence that these purchases had paid off for anyone other than the technology vendors themselves.”

p. 86. On Finland: teaching requires a rigorous master’s degree in the subject, not just in “education,” and a full year of student teaching. The math teacher the Finland-bound exchange student, Kim, had at home? He mostly wanted to be a football coach, and “figured the best way to become a coach was to become a math teacher.” “Instead of taking the more rigorous mathematics classes offered to other students, for example, education majors tended to take special math classes for students who did not like math.”

p. 90 – 91. Attempts to improve rigor of U.S. education for future teachers. In Rhode Island, plans to strengthen test-score requirements for teachers produced a hue-and-cry, but “Rhode Island’s teacher colleges already churned out 1,000 teachers a year, about 800 more than the school system needed to hire.”

p. 100. “In my own survey of 202 foreign-exchange students, an overwhelming majority said their U.S. classes were easier than their classes abroad.”

P. 130 ff. Poland — major reform in the system in 1998. For components: 1. new curriculum, with fundamental, rigorous goals, but local autonomy in implementation. 2. Standardized testing at the end of elementary, jr high and high school — at elementary, for diagnostic reasons, but at older ages, for tracking students and determining university admission. 3. delay tracking; high schools were tracked, but kids would basically stay in junior high, with an untracked curriculum, a further year. 4. Teacher autonomy. These reforms were controversial, but Poland zoomed up the PISA ranks.

p. 138 ff. Tracking: despite Germany’s famous early tracking system, “by the early 21st century, many countries were slowly, haltingly, delaying tracking. When they did so, all kids tended to do better.” Finland doesn’t track until age 16.

p. 144. key differences between U.S. and elsewhere: 1. heavy role of sports in American schools. 2. more autonomy during and outside of school.

p. 162. What about minorities? In Finland, even immigrant kids do well in school.

Her bottom line: American schools just aren’t as rigorous and demanding as in other developed nations — and American students aren’t as motivated — and this impacts their success substantially.

Now, to be sure, if you look around, you can manipulate the data to tell either story: that it’s the nonwhites who drag the United States down, or that, apples to apples, even the white middle class kids do poorly.

But I find it telling that the US math score was decidedly worse than the reading score — and that in the U.S., it’s perfectly acceptable for college-bound kids to simply decide, “I don’t need math” and that’s that, whereas in countries with a rigorous test required for admission to universities, math is certainly not optional, even for kids who want to study the humanities.

Can you even imagine a rigorous test required for admission to American universities? Yes, of course, there’s the SAT and the ACT, but each university decides on a different admission standard, and many don’t require anything. I’m talking about a test without which you may not enroll at any university or college — though, with our decentralized system — it’d probably have to be a test that the federal government would require for financial aid, or perhaps for accreditation. Can you imagine the uproar it would cause for students to know math? They’d probably demand that their poor math scores were disability-related and therefore the requirement was discrimination.

On the other hand, Canada’s test scores are quite respectable — 7th or so, and, so far as I can tell, the general structure of their system is pretty similar to ours. Is their greater success due to lack of poor-performing minority populations, or something else?

Uncategorized

education

Previous Post

March 8, 2015

Were children in the past really a profit center for their parents?

Next Post

March 10, 2015 From the Library: A Battle for the Soul of Islam, by Dr. M. Zuhdi Jasser

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who saw a vision of a ladder reaching heaven?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Joseph Isaac Adam Jacob