Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

From the library: The Age of Dignity; Preparing for the Elder Boom in a Changing America, by Ai-Jen Poo

Last updated on: March 22, 2015 at 10:17 pm   by Jane the Actuary

From the library: The Age of Dignity; Preparing for the Elder Boom in a Changing America, by Ai-Jen Poo 2015-03-22T22:17:41-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The author (whose foreign name is due to Taiwanese ancestry, but this doesn’t particularly factor into her story) is billed as “Co-Director of Caring Across Generations and MacArthur “Genius” Fellow, and her background is not one of working with the elderly, but advocating for the home care workers (healthcare and, more typically personal care aides), alongside other “domestic employees,” and this book is not about the elderly per se, but those who work for them (with large portions of the text spent telling stories of individual workers), and her crusade for improved pay, working conditions, and respect.

She begins with her own personal story, and some general words about the increase in the number of elderly and the difficulties that it brings.  For example:  the lack of geriatricians, who aren’t just “nice to have” but important to healthcare for the elderly; someone without specialized training and experience will mistake a treatable condition for a normal consequence of aging.  One difficultly:  Medicare reimbursements presume a 15-minute appointment, but in reality, office visits for the elderly require much more time.  Within families, daughters (because it’s generally daughters, not sons) caring for aging and severely impaired parents struggle mightily as the “sandwich generation,” feeling guilt for wishing the parent would die.

What about paid caregivers?  Sometimes they’re hired via Craig’s List or other informal sources; other times from an agency.  2/3rds of domestic workers (that is, including nannies and housecleaners as well) are foreign-born; half are here illegally.  They work far in excess of a 40-hour week, are paid less than minimum wage, are sometimes flat-out mistreated (even to the point of being subject to sexual demands) and, for those here illegally or otherwise working under the table, accept this for fear of being exposed or because they simply don’t want to lose the job and risk being unable to find a new employer.

She also cites a more general “unfairness” that all manner of “domestic work” is low paid, and attributes this to the fact that it’s viewed as “women’s work” and of little value accordingly.  (Not for her questions of supply and demand.)  And she describes the advocacy that produced the New York Domestic Workers Bill of Rights, and an update to Department of Labor regulations (effective 1/1/2015) that substantially narrowed the type of elder care that’s exempt from minimum wage and overtime; now, only work that is almost exclusively that of “fellowship”/”companionship” and “protection” (that is, making sure they don’t fall, etc.) is exempt, where previously, elder care was more generally exempt form minimum wage and overtime law.  (Live-in workers are still exempt from overtime requirements, but are still covered by minimum wage law for all on-duty hours.)

What’s her agenda, ultimately?

First, a $15 an hour wage.

Training opportunities for elder care workers.

Legalization for all illegal home-care workers, and a new guest-worker program.

How to fund this?  She’s not particularly interested in these details, but offers (1) tax hikes, (2) abandoning immigration enforcement and (3) Medicare and Medicaid “negotiation” of drug costs, and she cites long-term care benefits in Japan and Germany that are part of their social insurance programs, as well as proposals in various states.   She doesn’t particularly make an effort to calculate the cost or outline the extent to which the government should pay.  Does her preferred program include government coverage of 100% of care costs, and relieve family members who are currently caring for the elderly without pay?

What’s my take-away from this book?

She insists that institutional care is unaffordable because of its astronomical cost:  she cites a cost of $84,000 per year for a nursing home stay, and says that home care is more economical, but if we take her proposed $15 an hour, and multiply by 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 52 weeks a year, even excluding the additional costs for taxes, benefits, another other expenses, we’re at $131,000 per year, just for the care manpower.

She also focuses a great deal on the desire of the elderly to preserve their independence, even when, in reality, they are dependent on their caregivers.

But consider this:  the only ones who hire workers to care for their children, directly in their own home, are the wealthy and upper middle class.  Most families in need of child care services elect more cost-efficient daycare centers or home daycare providers.  Surely in the same way, elder care is more efficiently provided, perhaps not in large nursing homes, but in small groups, either as a group home, similar to the disabled, or via adult daycare, when the elder spends nights at “home” (which may be a child’s home) — especially for those for whom the care needed is meal prep, toileting help, and general supervision.  Or is the problem that the elderly want companionship, but don’t really want to be around, well, other old people?

Bottom line:  she highlights a real problem, but is woefully short on real solutions.

Uncategorized

eldercare

Previous Post



March 15, 2015

Is math optional? Or, should we have O and A levels, a Bac or an Abitur?

Next Post



March 16, 2015 6 reasons why Mom and Dad should move


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Daniel interpreted King Nebuchadnezzar's dream about a statue made of different metals.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Problem with False Prophets

Miller’s Station UMC| 10/18/26| Anchor Verse: Jeremiah 23: 1, 9-23   I...

Emotion in Early Christianity by Andrew Crislip

Andrew Crislip’s Emotion in Early Christianity examines an often overlooked dimension of...

16 Spiritual Touchstones for a More Grounded Life

  After decades of spiritual study, here are 16 principles I try...

Catholic Evangelization: Sharing Your Faith Every Day

Welcome back to the Graceful Awakening mini-series called, “From Faith to Mission.” ...

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube