Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Who pays for mass transit?

Last updated on: February 24, 2015 at 7:21 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Who pays for mass transit? 2015-02-24T19:21:33-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is somewhat long-winded and it takes a while to get to my point (to the extent that I have one), but please bear with me.

Illinois’ new governor, Bruce Rauner, presented his budget to the legislature, and the public, earlier this week.  Just as with Obama’s budget, it’s DOA because his party is in the minority in the legislature — but it’s got, unlike Obama’s tax hikes, major budget cuts.

One of those is transit — or, specifically, cuts to funding the Chicago area mass transit systems Metra (commuter rail), CTA (city El and buses) and Pace (suburban buses).

Per the Chicago Tribune,

The CTA, Metra and Pace would lose almost $130 million in state funding under the 2016 budget plan that Gov. Bruce Rauner presented Wednesday, potentially threatening transit services provided to disabled riders and opening the door to deep service cuts and fare increases for daily commuters on trains and buses, transit officials said.

The CTA alone would suffer a state cutback of more than $105 million, according to a preliminary analysis by the transit agency. The proposed cuts, roughly 7 percent of the agency’s operating budget, would risk reversing improvements the CTA has made in recent years, CTA spokesman Brian Steele said. . . .

In an apparent effort to downplay the impact, a fact sheet released by the governor’s office said the proposed reduction equals 4.4 percent of the Regional Transportation Authority’s $2.9 billion operating budget for the Chicago-area mass transit system in 2015.

So where does the money come from, in general?  Ah-ah!  “The transit system’s operating budgets are based approximately 40 percent on fares, 40 percent on sales tax revenue and 20 percent on state funding.”

So my first thought was this:  why not have the funds for Chicago-area transit come from Chicago?  Why should downstate Illinoisians have to pay?

But it’s not that simple, because every community of a certain size gets state funds to run its bus system, in some cases considerably more funds, relatively, than Chicago.  I tried to find some information online, and found out that, in Springfield, the state pays 62% of the operating budget, and fares a mere 9% of the total (the remainder coming from local and federal funding).  That’s a lot of state subsidy — far more than the 20% for the Chicago area!  Is this an anomaly because Springfield is the capitol and lawmakers send lots more money its way?

I looked around for other smaller towns in Illinois (Peoria, Urbana-Champaign, Kankakee) but they didn’t have the equivalent information on their transit websites.  But here’s a document with the details on state funding to downstate towns — Springfield gets 12.7 million in state funds and Peoria 19.3 million, for instance.

Now, I thought I could do some math around this.  I pulled up the population for the six-county area that’s officially part of the RTA, the regional transportation authority for the Chicago area:  8.3 million.  I divided the funds allocated by the state, according to the above document, 327.8 million, and calculated that the state of Illinois passes on about $40 per person for Chicago-area transit funding.

For Peoria, the county population is 188,000, so that’s about $100 per person.  For Springfield, the county population is 199,000, which produces $64 per person.  Are these the right numbers?  Who knows?  Their transit systems don’t serve the entire county, and only the county — and large portions of the six-county Chicagoland area aren’t really served by transit, even though they pay the local sales tax that funds it.

What’s fair?

Perhaps my first instinct of “every town/county/metro area” funds its own transit isn’t appropriate, because the state has the ability to collect more funds, via the income tax, than cities can.  But then should the state just allocate funds on a per-person basis and be done with it?  Are downstate areas “needier” and should be subsidized more?  (As it is, even their bus fares are cheaper — $1.00 or $1.25 rather than $2.50.)  In any case, this patchwork of funding with special programs for Chicagoland vs. downstate, seems hard to justify, as does the current plan to cut the RTA subsidies but leave everything else intact.

 And this is, of course, not even addressing the point of to what extent mass transit should be subsidized in the first place, but just who should be doing the subsidizing.

Is this just a small piece of the puzzle, and not particularly interesting?  But every single piece of Rauner’s budget is a matter of such decisions.  One of the other cuts is to generic revenue sharing, in which the state passes on some of the income tax revenue to local governments.

And yet:  at some point in the past, the budget was in balance, and it’s tempting to say, “just go back to the budget as it existed in” — when?  2000?  1990?   There were programs which were expanded since that point that aren’t even under discussion now:  funding for children’s health insurance and expansions in funding for preschool programs, to name two.

No matter what, getting the budget in balance won’t be as simple as waving a magic wand, and Rauner can’t be a second Walker when the legislature won’t vote how he wants.

Uncategorized

Illinois

transit

Previous Post



February 19, 2015

Obama seems to think that ISIS is a new incarnation of the People's Temple. Is he right?

Next Post



February 20, 2015 From the library: Burn


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How was Haman punished for his plot?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He was hanged on the gallows he built He was turned into a pillar of salt He was beheaded He was exiled

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

What's A Pro-Life Illinoisan To do?

Jane the Actuary

Family

Just how far are we willing to "trust...

Jane the Actuary

Family

Sell $100 billion in bonds? Not completely crazy

Jane the Actuary

Family

Jerry Brown, pension reform hero?

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

Jesus Was Not an Aristotelian

Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

The First Eucharistic Controversy: Christ’s Real Presence

For Catholics, the Eucharist is the source and summit of the Christian...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube