Cheese-eating surrender monkeys? Apparently, not so much

Last updated on: February 24, 2015 at 11:20 pm by Jane the Actuary

Cheese-eating surrender monkeys? Apparently, not so much 2015-02-24T23:20:42-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

From my sole window to the world of the French people, an old high school friend who was in the US as the daughter of a expat, but who returned back to France to finish high school and has been there ever since (via facebook):

Et voilà, une brêche dans le mur : l’auto-censure. D’est donc bien la France, LE pays de la LIBERTE , pas les USA. Défendons là ! Pas de brêche, pas d’aito-censure dans la presse et dans noyre quotidien. Nous nous devons de continuer à soutenir Charlie Hebdo pour son irréverrence, son insoumission, ses blasphèmes, ses bites volantes et ses railleries…

Even if you don’t read French, the word “auto-censure” you can pretty well understand as “self-censorship” — she is sharing an article from Slate.fr reporting on the New York Times’ statement that it wasn’t going to reprint the Charlie Hebdo cartoons, in order to avoid upsetting their Muslim readers. And, if my French isn’t too rusty, she says, in effect, that this proves that it is France, not the U.S., that is standing up for liberty, and (in a follow-up comment) remembering its heritage from the French Revolution itself. And a friend replies by sharing an article from lefigaro.fr, pushing back on the “I am Charlie” meme:

Si «nous sommes Charlie», tous les journaux de France et d’Europe devraient s’empresser de reproduire les dessins qui ont condamné à mort les journalistes de Charlie Hebdo. Le feront-ils? Probablement pas.

Which translates, roughly, as

If “we are Charlie,” all the papers in France and Europe ought to print the drawings which condemned the Charlie Hebdo journalists to death. Will they? Probably not.

(And she, by the way, has plenty of liberal bona fides, as her usual links are to Greenpeace articles.)

So I wanted to flag this “sample size of one” that the French see themselves as defenders of liberty, and of secularism.

But also —

Is it really this simple? Is it an equation of “refusal to publish Mohammed cartoons = acquiescing to unjustified extremist demands” really correct?

Imagine that the Islamists got their panties in a wad about pornography, and attacked Hustler (does Hustler still exist?) and Larry Flynt. No one would think that it was necessary to the cause of free speech for major American dailies to start publishing porn, or even “page 3 girls” or even selected images that the Islamists had specifically complained about – and if they did so, everyone would think it’s perfectly normal to black out the naughty bits.

So what’s the difference?

Obviously, in the one case, it’s a violation of community standards generally, and the free choice of the publisher, and in the other, it’s a specifically religious tenet. But that seems like an incomplete explanation — so at this point, as they said in my old actuarial math textbooks, this is “left as an exercise to the reader.”

Previous Post

January 10, 2015

A 20 minute post on Islam

Next Post

January 11, 2015 Here's a twist: I've been reported as spam

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who had a vision of a great sheet filled with unclean animals?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Peter John Stephen