Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Catholic
Politics and Religion
Day 1 of the new archbishop

Day 1 of the new archbishop

Last updated on: February 26, 2015 at 11:00 pm by Jane the Actuary

Day 1 of the new archbishop 2015-02-26T23:00:43-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Yesterday, Blase Cupich was formally installed as archbishop for the archdiocese of Chicago, and gave his first “official” homily. The day before, at a vigil prayer service with a greater number of politicians, he gave another homily. Taking the two of them as his first official words as archbishop, I’m disappointed.

The vigil homily.

He begins with customary thank-yous and welcomes (with a bonus pro-Native-American statement that their greetings are always “from one heart to another”), then moves into addressing “his agenda” — starting with a humble-brag that, of course, ” I know it is a disaster for me to have my own agenda” but rather “the agenda has to be God’s, which is beyond our imagining and our abilities.” Thanks, Bishop Cupich, for telling us that anything controversial you do or say comes from God, so we’d better just suck it up because you know better. (Yeah, I know, it’s mean-spirited, but at the same time, this “my agenda/God’s agenda” distinction just didn’t sit well with me.)

Then he speaks about Ezekiel. I don’t know if this was due to the day’s scripture reading, or self-selected, or both (that is, if the readings for a service like this may be chosen, and he picked this one), but he references the “dryness” of this passage from Ezekiel, and says this “dryness” exists among us, in the experiences of the elderly and the sick questioning their worth, their sense of purpose and their faith; in the homeless, the underemployed working poor; and in the successful business owner working long hours — as well as pastors and those who “serve in public life” do to the enormous challenges they face. But ” the Lord of Creation is with us, is walking through this dryness with us, the dryness we face each and every day as leaders.” And even among the dry bones, there is still life, and

All that is needed is for the prophet, the leader in their midst, to speak in a way that inspires, to speak to the deep yearnings of the people we serve, because it is God who is keeping alive their legitimate aspirations, even when there seems to be no hope.

So far, this is fine.

Then Cupich says that “in moments of deep disagreement” we should not “shy away from stating our position or making our point” — but he then says we need “civil discourse,” and makes his pitch that

Recent studies on the involvement of young people in religion and public life bear out a common factor that discourages their participation – the harsh rhetoric and lack of comity and civility within each group and in the way leaders in both groups treat each other. . . . It is not surprising that parishioners, citizens and the public become uneasy and disaffected with community and public life when they see leaders speak in ways that incite fears rather than inspire hope.

Still all a bit bland (except it does reinforce the stories that he didn’t support pro-life protests, and didn’t want to rock the boat with liberal supporters or public officials).

Next up:

There is a dryness in many people’s lives because they have little experience of being connected in society.

So he thanks all the “groups,” including labor unions, “government programs” and civic groups. And then he lists people of particular concern: “the mother needing prenatal and postnatal care and protection for herself and her child,” ex-cons, addicts, parents seeking quality education for their children. And he says “God’s desire to bring about this sense of belonging is present in the aspirations of every migrant and immigrant . . . . The work of comprehensive immigration reform is not important because it is on my agenda, but because it is on God’s.” (Sorry, but these people left communities in which they did “belong” to improve their economic well-being, so don’t tell me they’re seeking “belonging.”) Only after his paen to the immigrant does he mention gang violence, and here the contrast is clear: with respect to immigration, God demands that our legislators open our borders; with respect to gang violence, “there are no easy answers” but he’s happy to cheer-lead others trying to do something.

And that’s about it: he then goes back to generalities and cheerleading about the city of Chicago.

The installation homily.

This time, he starts right off with a hat tip to immigrants: the feast day is the name of his home church, which his immigrant grandparents helped establish, so this day “gives me a chance to recognize all immigrants.” This really feels forced.

The gospel reading is about Jesus walking on water: the disciples are fishing, it’s stormy, he comes to them, walking on the water, Peter is inspired and gets out of the boat, says, “give me the power to walk on the water, too,” and does so, until he becomes afraid and starts to sink.

What does he do with it? He pulls out three key themes. “We are to join Christ in seeking out, inviting, and accompanying, by abiding with those to whom he sends us.”

Seeking out: Jesus’s walk across the waters is a seeking out of the disciples, or, more metaphorically, of “the troubled, those who are lost.” What’s his motivation?

Jesus, we are told, has been on the mountain, in the quiet intimacy of prayer with his Father. That experience of sharing life with the Father is what moves him, prompts him to go out and seek others, so that they too may have this life.

Oh, yuck. Please tell me that Cupich does actually believe that Jesus is God! Because this sounds so fluffy and much more in the realm of “Jesus was an inspired prophet” — as if this prayer experience, rather than the full knowledge, from the beginning, of his ministry, was what motivated him. He then compares Jesus’s “drive and enthusiasm” to a beloved teacher correcting grammar on her deathbed.

Cupich continues:

We face in our day the formidable task of passing on the faith to the next generation, of evangelizing a modern and sometimes skeptical culture, not to mention inspiring young people to serve the Church as priests and religious. It all seems so daunting, as daunting as walking on water. We are at sea, unsteady in our approach faced with these concerns. Catechists and educators are on the front line of this struggle. So, too, parents and grandparents wonder if they are going to be the last Catholics in their family. Likewise bishops and priests find that the Good News is increasingly difficult to proclaim in the midst of great polarization in church and society.

Jesus tells all of us today to go back to where our journey of faith began, to be in touch with the joyful experience of being transformed by the intimacy God offers us, to be willing to share it with the next generation. Young people have always been attracted to authenticity of life, where words match deeds. Let’s not be afraid to let our young people know about our life with God and how it began.

So, fine, except that I’m not sure what he means by “great polarization” that prevents proclaiming the Good News.

He then throws in a mention of outreach to victims of sexual abuse by priests. I suppose it had to be done, though it doesn’t really fit.

Inviting: I’m not really sure what the difference between “seeking out” and “inviting” is but it doesn’t really matter; this section of the homily is actually about responding to the invitation, leaving “our comfort zone” to “take an entirely new step in our faith journey, both personally and as a community.” This is all fairly vague. Personally, we are to end “episodic Sunday Mass attendance” and “change habitual bad behavior.” And the bishops’ conference is inviting ” our nation to be what it has always promised to be, to protect the vulnerable, poor and weak, to treat immigrants with justice and dignity, to respect life and to be good stewards of creation.”

Perhaps this is harmless. Or perhaps he is signalling that he is planning on Big Changes.

Accompanying: just as Jesus gets into the boat, so to he comes to be with us. (Again, a bit of de-deifying Jesus: “I have always thought that it took more courage for Jesus to get into that boat with those disciples than for Peter to get out of it to walk on water. There was fear, doubt, jealousy even anger in that boat – a lot of unresolved conflicts as a therapist might say.” Ewww.) This last section of his homily is pretty standard stuff.

So there you have it.

I know there’s the school of thought that says, “young people these days leave the Catholic Church because they think it’s too focused on pelvic issues, so if we just shut up about that, and tell them explicitly or by our seeming indifference, that we’ve removed sexual sins from the catechism, happy days are here again.” Is that his plan?

Or is it all about the Hispanics, putting political advocacy for open borders at the top of the list because he’s written off everyone else?

Bottom line: I’m disappointed.

Uncategorized

Archbishop Cupich

Previous Post

November 18, 2014

"The New Unpeople" - from The Economist

Next Post

November 19, 2014 Archbishop Cupich is pro-illegal-immigrant-legalization. Does it do any harm?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

To what place did Jacob flee after stealing his brother's blessing?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Haran Bethel Egypt Nineveh