Archbishop Cupich is pro-illegal-immigrant-legalization. Does it do any harm?

Last updated on: February 26, 2015 at 11:00 pm by Jane the Actuary

Archbishop Cupich is pro-illegal-immigrant-legalization. Does it do any harm? 2015-02-26T23:00:32-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Earlier today, I blogged on the two homilies given by the new archbishop in Chicago, trying to pick them apart as to what it portends for his future tenure here.

Just now, I flipped through the weekly paper put out by the archdiocese, and was inspired to look at their website. Apparently, he’s big on “immigration reform,” though it’s not clear how far he goes (truly open borders? just open for Mexicans, or Latin Americans generally speaking?). Here’s the key quote from an article, “The plight of immigrants close to the heart of new leader.”

The vast majority of immigrants come here because they are poor and desperately need work to support their families. But they also come because we need their labor. Washington State ranks in the top 10 among states that rely on undocumented workers for their workforce.

They harvest our produce and crops. They clean our hotel rooms and serve food in our restaurants. They care for our children, tend our lawns, and take on the manual labor we are unable or unwilling to do for ourselves. But they also are professionals — lawyers, physicians, technicians, priests, Sisters, mechanics, builders — and even soldiers serving our country. Immigrants, both documented and undocumented, are employed in virtually every sector of our economy. …

Note that he simply discards any distinction between illegal and legal immigrants in his last sentence, and presumably in the penultimate sentence — one hopes that there aren’t lawyers and physicians working under false identities, and one presumes that the Catholic Church is able to bring in priests and sisters legally (though, really, I don’t know what kind of visa it would be — clearly, they’d be able to establish that they couldn’t find a sufficient number of Americans, but it wouldn’t be a technical skill). And as you can imagine, it rankles me to say that it’s fine and dandy for illegal immigrants to break any number of laws, either working under the table or with falsified or stolen identitites.

This is also a far bigger plea than the usual claim that “illegal immigrants are so integrated into our communities that it would be unjust to uproot them” — it does not appear that he has a one-time legalization in mind.

So — given that — is it possible to say, “even if you disagree, what harm would it do?” What are the implications of Cupich pursuing this as a key priority? Could one just say, it’s no different than a hobby, something he pursues in his spare time, when not tending to the needs of his flock?

And I think it does have a real effect. Already I’ve gotten e-mail invitations, from a list I’m on, to join in a march for “immigration reform.” And back when the Gang of 8 bill was being debated, there was a letter that was required to be published in all church bulletins. If Cupich goes further down this road, of being very active in the political arena, on a divisive issue, it sends the signal that he’s more interested in politics than ministry. It also communicates to Catholics in the pews of suburban churches that they don’t really count — except when it comes time for the Annual Catholic Appeal, and they’d better not get any ideas.

And besides, this is Chicago. Job 1 is the Catholic school system, and finding a way to end the annual rite of announcing school closings.

UPDATE:

I was thinking about this some more while driving my son to his climbing-wall class at the Y.

Here’s the thing: do middle-class suburban Catholics “count” or should the archbishop focus on the needy in the inner city? If Church was a social service group, providing care for the materially impoverished, then asking for some attention to the middle class would be whiny and self-serving. But it’s not — Cupich’s job is the care of souls, not the provision of food or housing or healthcare.

And to say “you middle class folk have everything you need” kind of misses the point of church, which is about spiritual, not material welfare, and middle class people can be just as spiritually impoverished, or even more so. After all, Jesus ate with tax collectors. And in our “CFM” (Christian Family Movement) group at church, the empty-nester couples speak of hoping that their adult children might someday return to church. Is the middle-class Catholic obliged to take a “do it yourself” approach to religion, because the “Church is about caring for the poor” approach communicates that their spiritual well-being doesn’t matter?

Previous Post

November 19, 2014

Day 1 of the new archbishop

Next Post

November 19, 2014 I miss John King Books

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many disciples did Jesus have?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Seven Ten Twenty Twelve