Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Not with a bang but a whimper: how employer-sponsored health insurance will end

Last updated on: February 26, 2015 at 11:19 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Not with a bang but a whimper: how employer-sponsored health insurance will end 2015-02-26T23:19:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This comes out of recent personal experience as a employee, or rather, as the spouse of an employee with employer-sponsored healthcare, as well as regular training sessions at work.

Open enrollment is coming around, and initial announcements are beginning — no actual pricetags, yet, but the statement that our company has had higher-than-average claims for the last several years, and that, once again, it’s going to lead to a change in the cost-sharing.  That is, rather than continuing to pay, say, 80% of premiums, they’re going to pass the “excess” cost increase onto employees by now paying only 70%.  Of course, when we have a good year, with lower-than-average claims, you can bet they’re not going to boost up the cost-share to 80% again.

Those of you with employer-sponsored health insurance, think about what you pay for health insurance now, vs. a decade or two ago.  (I paid $10, in total, in copays when my oldest was born.)  Yes, part of it is that health insurance in general has gone up in cost; I’m not discounting that — but the employer’s share is also decreasing.  And this trend will accelerate.  Employers want out.  Sure, there are requirements in Obamacare, depending on how upcoming court decisions are decided, but there is still a lot of latitude for decreasing the cost-share, especially for dependents.

And it used to be seen as important that employers offer generous healthcare benefits for employee retention.  Sure, my firm still offers studies to employers comparing their benefit programs to our database of participating employers, and I haven’t been involved in this particular project for a good decade now, but my hunch is that employers are more willing to be below-average in healthcare subsidy if they can hit their “average” target in other ways.  In any event, we also conduct surveys in which employers state that they are more concerned with controlling cost than with employee satisfaction over their healthcare benefits.

After the financial accounting statement 106 was published in the early 90s requiring employers to account for future healthcare liabilities in the same way as pension liabilities, employers nearly-universally abandoned retiree healthcare benefits, except for grandfathered groups.  At least with pensions, pay increases were more or less predictable, and there were well-established funding mechanisms.  Not so for healthcare.

One of the approaches many employers took was a “cap” — “we will contribute a subsidy amount which we will allow to grow to no more than 2 times our subsidy as of 1993,” for instance.  And I expect that employers will apply this approach to employee healthcare, too.

So what happens when, over time, employer contributions have dropped to new lows?  — especially since, if your employer-sponsored insurance is deemed “affordable” for the employee, the spouse and children aren’t able to get subsidies or even go onto the exchange at all?   In an ideal world, that’s when we’d start to see some real change, but there’s still no reason to believe that providers, especially near-monopoly hospitals, won’t still hold all the cards.  Maybe, maybe some competing insurer will offer new apps allowing you to find the lowest-cost way of getting those stitches in your kid’s forehead (yeah, second time this year — but now we hit the deductible and are home free for the rest of the year), even if you have to drive longer distances.  But that’s about it.  Other than that, I got nothing.

Uncategorized

employer healthcare

Previous Post



October 3, 2014

If you believe that sex is just another form of recreation, then

Next Post



October 5, 2014 From the library: The Rule of Nobody; Saving America from Dead Laws and Broken Government, by Philip K. Howard


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian denomination is most associated with the Reformation led by Martin Luther?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lutheran Catholic Orthodox Anglican

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

Amazonian Healthcare? Good luck . . .

Jane the Actuary

Family

I hate annual enrollment

Jane the Actuary

Family

Narrow networks for thee, not for me!

Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Jesus and the Law of Moses: An Interview...

It is my pleasure to interview Paul Sloan on his recent book,...

How Does Ặnāvâ Connect Katie Zacharia & Georgia?

This weekend, the big news has been the sudden departure of Trump’s...

The Woman We Remember by Her Wound

Śūrpaṇakhā Had a Heart Desire, humiliation, and the woman behind a turning...

6 Ways to Promote a Healthy Relationship

Karen, 42, and Kevin, 41, have been married for ten years and...

Jad Gillies on New Hillsong Worship Songs and...

For worship leader Jad Gillies, Hillsong Worship’s next chapter is not about...

Looking at the Largest Orthodox Cathedral on Earth

  There is often a considerable amount of anger and, shall we...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube