From the library: Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice, by Sidney Powell

Last updated on: March 1, 2015 at 10:10 pm by Jane the Actuary

From the library: Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice, by Sidney Powell 2015-03-01T22:10:49-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This is a very interesting book, and very timely, too, considering Eric Holder’s resignation announcement.

The author is an attorney defending a former Merrill Lynch employee, Jim Brown, caught up in the Enron prosecutions, and she writes both about her experience defending Brown (with lots of dialogue which presumably came from trial transcripts rather than reconstructed storytelling), and the bigger picture of what happened with the government’s prosecution of both the Enron case and the Stevens corruption case. The bottom line is that in both cases, the government deliberately, egregiously hid crucial exculpatory evidence from the accused, despite their legal obligation to provide it, called the “Brady” obligation after a court case establishing this requirement.

This was quite eye-opening. I had pretty much thought that the Bad Guys got what was coming to them, and that Stevens, a long-time senator from Alaska, was guilty of abusing his power. But he was exonerated — though he then died in an unexplained plane crash shortly thereafter. As to the Enron case, even Arthur Anderson was exonerated, long after the company was destroyed. I didn’t know this. And the prosecutors went after bit players based on more or less invented crimes, relying on the anger in Houston, and the willingness of judges, for their convictions. Powell’s client was in the end partially exonerated, and had a new trial ordered for other of his “crimes,” which in the end, the federal prosecutors declined to prosecute, after they apparently accidentally revealed that they had previously been hiding exculpatory information.

The biggest actual fraudster in the Enron case, Andrew Fastow, happily cooperated with the DoJ’s other prosecutions, testifying for them, and served less than 6 years in prison.

It’s not even partisan politics, because these cases began under the Bush administration and continued under Obama. The bottom-line reason for the DoJ corruption was that winning convictions was the path towards career advancement — and in an epilogue, Powell chronicles the fate of these lawyers, not meeting a downfall worthy of their misdeeds, but advancing in ranks in government work or in private law firms. The most notable of these promotions was Kathryn Ruemmler, who suppressed exculpatory evidence, made her way to White House counsel.

And Holder? When these cases came to light, he announced that henceforth, the DoJ would follow the law, then started backtracking and has not implemented any serious reform. Powell doesn’t point to any current prosecutions where Justice attorneys are suppressing exculpatory evidence — but the key is that in both the Enron and the Stevens cases, it wasn’t known until after the fact, due to “accidental” revelations or whistleblowers, that this happened.

Uncategorized

corruption

Justice Department

Previous Post

September 28, 2014

The "dependent benefits" case for global, rather than territorial, taxation

Next Post

September 28, 2014 10,000 hours of practice -- or genes?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many years did the Israelites wander in the wilderness?

Select your answer to see how you score.

10 years 25 years 40 years 100 years