Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

What a true amnesty for illegal immigrants would look like

Last updated on: June 15, 2014 at 9:59 pm   by Jane the Actuary

What a true amnesty for illegal immigrants would look like 2014-06-15T21:59:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

(This comes out of comments to another post, but I wanted to separate this into another discussion.)

Is legalization of illegal immigrants “amnesty” or a “path to citizenship” or something else?

Think of “amnesty” in any other context:  it doesn’t mean extra privileges to violators, but simply removing penalties.

A “library amnesty” like this one in Chicago (the first hit in my google search) means that fines are erased for individuals who return books, regardless of how overdue they are.  But — they don’t get to keep the books.

A parking-fine amnesty like this one in Arlington Heights doesn’t clear one’s record of parking fines; it simply makes it possible to pay the fine at the original amount, not the increased late-pay amount.

The Carter amnesty of draft-dodgers?  Yes, it waived penalties completely — but didn’t provide any extra benefits to the dodgers.

Which means that, in the case of illegal immigration, a “true” amnesty would be a limited action:  remove the penalties associated with overstaying visas/entering illegally/reentering after deportation, which stand at 3 years’ or 10 years’ ban from entering the country, depending on the length of the illegal stay.  This would enable people who are, but for this penalty, eligible to apply for some form of legal stay, to do so:  those married to American citizens, students eligible for a Student Visa, and the so-called “best and brightest” DREAMers that the media likes to portray as ready to cure cancer could apply for H1-B visas.

What about individuals eligible to apply for residency under some other category, but one with waiting lists — that is, family reunification visas for extended family rather than spouses and children?  Personally, I think it’d be do-able to persuade even hard-liners to agree to provide residency permits which are exclusively limited to residency, not work eligibility.

And I’d really like to see enforcement-first and enforcement-only proponents, as a sign of good faith, support such a “true amnesty.”  They can even say, “I support a real amnesty.  Our opponents support mass legalization.”  

Of course, this isn’t the complete answer.  Like the majority of Americans, I’d be fine with a legalization program only as the final component of a program of real, meaningful border security, workplace enforcement, and actions against identity theft/false IDs and under-the-table work.  And, separate from this, we need better decisions about the number and type of immigrants we admit each year — both with a eye to the question of how immigration fits into the overall rate of population growth, and what sort of balance between highly- and poorly-educated immigrants is best for our country in the long run.

Having said this, is a “true amnesty” politically feasible?

According to this Daily Caller article from back in March,

Representatives Steve Pearce (R-NM) and David Valadao (R-CA) have introduced a bill with Representative Beto O’Rourke (D-TX) and five other Democrats that would exempt immediate family members of U.S. citizens from the bars.

And according to this Cato piece from April, even Mark Krikorian, executive director of the Center for Immigration Studies, would support removing these 3/10 year bans.

What happened to this bill?  I can’t figure this out, actually.  Presumably Democrats aren’t pursuing it because they want the whole, mass legalization, not a partial one.  What about the GOP?  Don’t know.  Are there political/procedural risks, ways in which this bill could be a fist step towards machinations that can’t be allowed to happen?

(Note:  this is, partly, a repeat and rephrasing of something I wrote back in the fall.)

Uncategorized

Previous Post



June 11, 2014

From the library: How Could This Happen, Explaining the Holocaust, by Dan McMillan

Next Post



June 15, 2014 Things about which I am not blogging


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What prophet, along with Zechariah, encouraged the rebuilding of the Temple?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Obadiah Haggai Elijah Malachi

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

Dolly Parton’s Last Song Wins Dove Award with...

Bluegrass band The Grascals, speaking on the red carpet at the 57th...

The Image: On the Horror of Capitalism and...

The Image Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might...

Thoughts about Halloween

We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube