Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Mystery Demographics?

Last updated on: June 8, 2014 at 10:58 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Mystery Demographics? 2014-06-08T22:58:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Here’s an article from the Washington Examiner (as linked to by Drudge):  “Women are having fewer kids, and demographers don’t know why.”

The bottom line:  the fertility rate has been dropping dramatically in the years since 2007, from 2.1 to a current 1.86, and demographers are struggling to understand “why the decline in fertility has persisted even as the worst effects of the labor market have abated.”

One clear trend is that women are waiting until older ages to have children.  The article says:

While birth rates for women in their teens and early 20s have fallen to record lows, the corresponding rates for women in their 30s and 40s have continued to rise, uninterrupted, throughout the recession. The average age of women at their first birthhas risen for four straight decades.

Mark Mather, an associate vice president at the Population Reference Bureau, explained that the shift to older childbearing largely reflects young adults waiting to get married. That entails fewer children overall, Mather noted, because “it does get more difficult as people wait until they’re older to start families.”

The big question is whether fertility rates for young women will pick up as the economy gathers strength. “Uncertainty still kind of rules the day,” said Sam Sturgeon, the president of Demographic Intelligence, a firm that provides demographic forecasts for businesses.

Sturgeon’s own expectation is that young women will return to childbearing once the economy strengthens, because “there’s a very strong two-child norm in the U.S., and we haven’t seen any evidence that women want fewer.” Nevertheless, he said, he wouldn’t be surprised if fertility rates for teens and women in their 20s did not pick back up.

This I found odd:  is there really a two-child norm?  Perhaps this demographer has access to data that quantifies this — but I’m not buying it.  Sure, there are two-child families, but there’s a strong trend of childlessness, and wasn’t there a book out defending the one-child family?  I would be really surprised if the two-child norm was really a driving force in fertility trends, so much as 3 or 4 children-families balancing out 0 or 1-children.

(I poked around in the data some, and the closest I could find is a CDC report which didn’t to the math to extrapolate to a children-per-women distribution, but reported on actual and expected – via survey – children.  For “actual,” let’s look at the distribution for women ages 40 – 44:  true, the most common number of children is 2, at 35%, but:  15% of women have no children, 15% only one, 20% have three, and 14% have four or more.  Interestingly, more women “expect” to have 2 children — 41% of all women — but this is due to a decline in the percent expecting 0 or 1 children, only 21% instead of 30%, and, from what I’ve read before, in the end, women, in general, end up having fewer children than they expect, not more.)

But take a look at this:

That’s the graphic from this article.

The drop in the last several years still means that we’re higher than in 1980.  Was this due to the 1970s “population bomb” fears being eased?  Or is this due to the drop in Hispanic childbearing, which the article also mentions: “But the number of children per Hispanic-American woman has plummeted from just under three in 1990 and 2.7 as recently as 2008 to 2.19 in 2012, just above the replacement rate.”

This drop is astonishing, but the article doesn’t indicate how much of the total TFR drop is attributable to Hispanic fertility drops.

Are these temporary economic declines?  Or is this a permanent drop due to changing cultural expectations, such as an increased openness to childlessness or one-child families, or a greater push for “welfare moms” to use contraception?  One suspects that, even if the initial fertility drops were due to the economy, with young people feeling that it takes longer to become “established” and ready to parent, the longer the sluggish economy persists, the more likely it is for cultural expectations to simply have changed enough that fertility rates will be permanently lower?

Or is this all due to the changing patterns among minorities?

Uncategorized

Previous Post



June 7, 2014

The New Manchurian Candidate? (with bonus commentary)

Next Post



June 11, 2014 Why did Cantor lose, and Graham won?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

"Train up a child in the way he should go" is found in which book?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jonah Job Matthew Proverbs

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Great Matter: Walking the Zen Way

(This talk was delivered by Dharma Holder Mo Myokan Weinhardt at the...

Netflix Narnia Update

The official trailer for the Netflix Narnia movie has been released.  Director...

Why Halloween Is So Popular – And So...

Numerous sources say that Halloween is now the second most popular holiday...

Westminster Abbey-- Part Three

There are many more novelists, poets, playwrights and actors in poet's corner...

South Carolina Brought the Firing Squad Back. Now,...

  The military intends to pull Nidal Hassan out of his wheelchair,...

Which is the Greatest Commandment?

Every religious practice, doctrine, tradition, and interpretation must ultimately be measured through...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube