Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

From the library: “The Israeli Solution: A One-State Plan for Peace in the Middle East” by Caroline B. Glick

Last updated on: December 27, 2016 at 2:24 pm   by Jane the Actuary

From the library: “The Israeli Solution: A One-State Plan for Peace in the Middle East” by Caroline B. Glick 2016-12-27T14:24:21-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve been reading this book off-and-on over this past week.  It isn’t the sort of can’t-put-it-down writing style that keeps you turning the pages, but here’s the main point:

The Palestinians simply have proven again and again that they will not make peace with the Israelis.  So often have they, and in particular Arafat and Abbas, acted in bad faith, rejected peace offers without even a counter-offer, continued to sponsor terrorist attacks even while proclaiming that they supported “peace,” propagandized, even and especially to children, in favor of terrorists and against Jews, that it is rank foolishness to believe that they are a “partner in peace.”  And yet the United States and Europe continue to support the PLO and the Palestinian Administration, and even accept Hamas.  What’s more, the PA is exceptionally corrupt and brutal.

Page after page, Glick recounts the PLOs misdeeds (and the missed opportunities to let them die, when the Lebanese expelled them and Reagan delusionally persuaded Tunesia to take them in, for instance, or when their prospects were dimmed by their mistaken support of Iraq in the first Gulf War, but Bush “rescued” them by supporting the “peace process” after the war).  It becomes quite depressing to see that everyone is so desperate for an agreement as to ignore the fact that the PLO’s goal is not a free Palestinian state, but the destruction of Israel.  What’s more, U.S. presidents have repeatedly convinced themselves that an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement in the form of a separate Palestinian state is the linchpin for peace in the Arab and Muslim world.

Glick’s solution?  Incorporate the West Bank into Israel itself.  Offer Palestinians citizenship if they wish it, but if not, apply Israeli law and, most important, Israeli legal protections in place of the corruption of the the PA.  The PLO and other sponsors of terror won’t like it, but the Israeli government will be able to destroy them anyway.  The other Arab states won’t like it, but they won’t intervene, and ultimately the Americans and Europeans will accept the Israeli action.

But – you say – isn’t a “one-state solution” demographic suicide?    Won’t the Arabs, both those now in Israeli and those in the Occupied Territories, outnumber the Jewish Israelis by virtue of their extremely high birthrates?  Glick disputes this.  First, she says, she has no interest in Gaza — that’s gone and never had any historic connection to Israel and a Jewish Homeland anyway.  And, second, the census which the Palestinian Authority conducted was fraudulent, both in double-counting, including Palestinians living outside the Gaza/West Bank borders (who Glick does not, of course, envision welcoming back), and exaggerated estimates for population growth.

Is she right?  The World Bank (see my links here) reports a very high TFR for the West Bank and Gaza, 4.0 children per women, which is clearly higher than Israel’s 3.0.  And I’ve read in the past that the West Bank and Gaza are like a welfare state gone amok, so much so that the people breed like rabbits, claiming additional “welfare money” for each new child, rather than needing to support their children themselves.  But Glick cites fertility rates for Gaza and the West Bank separately, in which the fertility rate for Gaza, at 4.57, is considerably higher than that of the West Bank, which is equal to that of Jews in Israel, both at 2.98.

In any event, her arguments are compelling, yet it’s difficult to imagine that she’d be listened to, that John Kerry, for instance, would move away from the “two-state” objective, and the “Israeli concessions will bring about Arab cooperation” strategy, especially in light of the “BDS” (Boycott, Divestiture, Sanctions) movement that’s gaining steam, for instance, at American universities and even with a resolution of the Presbyterian Church (USA).  But she is convincing when she says that this “two-state” strategy will fail, or, more accurately, will continually fail just as much as it has failed for the past decades, and that as long as the actors continue to pursue it, the next decades will be wasted every bit as much as the past.

Update 7/15/14:

Now we’re in the midst of another outbreak of slowly-simmering warfare between Israel and Gaza, and I find myself wondering:  are Gaza and the West Bank culturally the same, and the only reason why Gaza is launching rockets and the West Bank isn’t, is that Israel has left Gaza to its own devices but still has a military presence in the West Bank?  Or is Gaza historically, culturally, politically its own entity, so that it makes sense to think of it separately, with a separate solution for them (either nominal independence with a UN “peacekeeping” presence or annexation to Egypt) vs. for the West Bank?

Consider that, as of today, Egypt attempted to broker a cease-fire, which Israel accepted and Gaza/Hamas summarily rejected (reported by legalinsurrection.com, among others).  What else is there to do?

Uncategorized

Israel

Palestinian conflict

Previous Post



June 28, 2014

Parking a link: "UK Facing 'Major' Sperm Shortage

Next Post



June 29, 2014 Holy Pediatrician Overreach, Batman?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who challenged Goliath to a duel before the army of Israel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Abner Jonathan David Saul

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

From the River. . . to the Yearbook

Jane the Actuary

Family

The Six Day War was 50 years ago....

Jane the Actuary

Family

What would an Arab-majority state of Israel look...

Jane the Actuary

Family

The Holocaust and "what happened next"

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Emotion in Early Christianity by Andrew Crislip

Andrew Crislip’s Emotion in Early Christianity examines an often overlooked dimension of...

16 Spiritual Touchstones for a More Grounded Life

  After decades of spiritual study, here are 16 principles I try...

Catholic Evangelization: Sharing Your Faith Every Day

Welcome back to the Graceful Awakening mini-series called, “From Faith to Mission.” ...

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

'Super Scam Me' Exposes AI Jon Bon Jovi...

Leslie Pickett believed she was in a relationship with Jon Bon Jovi....

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube