Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

“What is truth?” and “What difference at this point does it make?”

Last updated on: May 6, 2014 at 9:35 am   by Jane the Actuary

“What is truth?” and “What difference at this point does it make?” 2014-05-06T09:35:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So I was doing a bit of pre-work browsing, and read this piece by Kevin D. Williamson at National Review on Benghazi.

The whole story of Benghazi, as it’s unfolding, is discouraging.  The bottom line is that the administration chose to blame the attack on the “Innocence of Muslims” video on youtube.com despite having solid information to the contrary, because of a fear that acknowledging that this was a planned and coordinated al-Qaeda attack would put into question the campaign narrative that Obama had al-Qaeda on the run.  The Williamson piece argues that the administration put out this lie because they had become habituated to lying, not because it was vitally important to the campaign strategy, since, after all, Americans well understand that the situation is complex and are not, and were not, fools enough to believe that, due to Obama, all Muslim extremists had laid down their arms.

Other articles I’d read recently, too, such as this piece by Ann Althouse, point to a concerted Democratic strategy at this point to paint those who question the Administration’s narrative on Benghazi as a bunch of crazy conspiracy theorists, and to move the narrative as reported in the media to, not just “Benghazi must not be questioned,” but, “the fact that Republicans question Benghazi means they’re just as crazy as the Birthers.”
We’ve got legions of fact-checkers, but we seem, as a country, to have simply accepted that politicians will lie whenever it’s convenient.

Did Obama really oppose gay marriage initially, and only “evolve” later?  No one believes that.  Even his supporters are quite comfortable with the fact that he lied in the past, because it was a politically-expedient lie to improve his election prospects.

Did the Illinois politicians, when they raised our income tax from 3.5% to 5%, really believe it was “temporary”?  Did their supporters believe them?  I doubt it — but it was politically expedient.

And the GOP is hardly exempt — I can’t point off the top of my head to a similar instance when a GOP politician lied and rank-and-file supporters knew it was a lie but were happy for the political advantage, but, in the present day, on the comment sections of conservative websites, you’ll find a general conviction that the top GOP leadership is more than happy to sign onto an immigration “reform” bill if only they can maintain the fiction that the bill contains genuinely effective enforcement provisions that aren’t dependent on the administration’s willingness to implement them.  Which actually isn’t a good example, because the Base is worried that their elected officials will deceive them, rather than happily being “in” on a lie.

And then we come to Hillary Clinton:  “What difference at this point does it make?”  Politico provides an extended transcript (more than just the paragraphs below):

Clinton: Well, no, it’s the fact. Number two, I would recommend highly you read both what the ARB said about it and the classified ARB because, even today, there are questions being raised. Now, we have no doubt they were terrorists, they were militants, they attacked us, they killed our people. But what was going on and why they were doing what they were doing is still unknown —

(Wisconsin Senator Ron) Johnson: No, again, we were misled that there were supposedly protests and that something sprang out of that — an assault sprang out of that — and that was easily ascertained that that was not the fact, and the American people could have known that within days and they didn’t know that.

Clinton: With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans. Was it because of a protest or was it because of guys out for a walk one night who decided that they’d they go kill some Americans? What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. Now, honestly, I will do my best to answer your questions about this, but the fact is that people were trying in real time to get to the best information. The IC has a process, I understand, going with the other committees to explain how these talking points came out. But you know, to be clear, it is, from my perspective, less important today looking backwards as to why these militants decided they did it than to find them and bring them to justice, and then maybe we’ll figure out what was going on in the meantime.

Reading this full exchange makes this more nonsensical than I had remembered:  strictly reading her words, Clinton simultaneously says that it doesn’t matter whether the men died because of a protest or a coordinated attack, but then also says they are trying to figure out what happened, and that it does matter.  But Clinton’s “what difference” line can only mean, “it doesn’t matter whether we deceived you earlier.”

Which, it being not to far from Easter, reminds me of the Pontius Pilate line, when Jesus says he is testifying to the truth, “What is truth?” — which is understood to be exactly this sort of “who cares about the truth” attitude.  The more things change, the more things stay the same, I guess.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



May 5, 2014

Congratulations, Wisconsin -- another way in which you're better than Illinois

Next Post



May 6, 2014 Parking some links: on the "is fat bad?" debate


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul tell the Philippians to work out with fear and trembling?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Your calling Your faith Your salvation Your ministry

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Problem with False Prophets

Miller’s Station UMC| 10/18/26| Anchor Verse: Jeremiah 23: 1, 9-23   I...

Emotion in Early Christianity by Andrew Crislip

Andrew Crislip’s Emotion in Early Christianity examines an often overlooked dimension of...

16 Spiritual Touchstones for a More Grounded Life

  After decades of spiritual study, here are 16 principles I try...

Catholic Evangelization: Sharing Your Faith Every Day

Welcome back to the Graceful Awakening mini-series called, “From Faith to Mission.” ...

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube