Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Should we tax the childless?

Last updated on: April 3, 2014 at 7:58 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Should we tax the childless? 2014-04-03T19:58:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

That was the topic of a click-bait Slate article, ” Tax the Childless; We should slash taxes on parents by jacking them up for nonparents,” which inspired a NYT Room for Debate debate.

The gist of the initial argument is something we’ve all seen before:  parents bear a double burden, not only paying Social Security taxes for today’s elderly, but doing the hard, and costly, work of producing the next generation, who will, someday, provide the labor force to take care of the next generation’s elderly, and who will, quite simply, keep the economy functional in the future.

And most other developed nations do have some kind of “child benefit,” and this is less politically-charged than maternity leave benefits, or subsidized or free child care, because it’s universally provided rather than favoring parents who one choice or another in the debate over working or stay-at-home moms.

But — let’s face it — those countries with generous benefits for parents don’t do so because they want to be “fair” but because they’re trying to prop up an unsustainably-low birth rate.  This is not a problem we face:  whether because the poor have insufficient access to contraception, as progressives might argue, or because we’re simply a more child-friendly culture in general, we have no shortage of babies, and large-scale immigration is growing our population even more.  Pragmatically, we don’t need to encourage people to have more children — and, besides, the natalist policies elsewhere don’t seem to make that much difference, anyway.

On top of which, the Room for Debate pieces focus on the poor, and the fact that poor folks need help whether they have a dozen children, the idealized two, or none at all.  But they kind of miss the point, anyway:  several of the authors take the approach of, “let me tell you about what I want instead.”

Anyway —

my initial thought was, “I don’t accept my kids whining about unfairness; why should we structure taxes around the approach that it’s unfair for parents to have more hardship than the childless?”  And various of the commenters (when they weren’t railing about breeders overpopulating the world) pointed out that punitive tax rates for the childless would also ensnare those who are trying to become financially settled before having children.  But, sure, I’d love to fill my kitchen with fancy small appliances and go on vacations in the off-season, and I’m producing the next generation, and making sure they do their homework and practice the piano, so maybe all you childless slackers who can watch PG 13 movies whenever you want should pay me.

But then I started thinking about the fact that when it comes to the wealthy, we very much want taxes to be “fair.”  We’re always talking about the wealthy paying “their fair share.”  So, if we are going to have to raise taxes on the wealthy to balance the budget, maybe children should factor into it.

And — I’m just putting this out there, as an idea, and just a shell of one, not fleshed out — what if our tax brackets were based, not on married vs. single, but on whether you’ve got children, so that, at the upper income levels, childless individuals and couples take a bigger tax bit at a lower level than child-ed families?

Uncategorized

Previous Post



April 3, 2014

Did President Obama "Whitewash" World War I?

Next Post



April 4, 2014 Decisions, decisions. . .


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Greek word "Agape" mean in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peace Eternal Life Unconditional Love Grace

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

What Was the Sin of Judas?

Whenever people talk about betrayal, the name of Judas can’t help but...

Trump Is Changing the USA from Being a...

Yesterday, in front of the White House before the media, President Donald...

The Ravana We Burn, the Ravana We Worship

From the Gond communities of central India to the Brahmins of Rajasthan...

Smart people saying smart things (10.20.26)

Take time to listen to Libby Garland, Molis Augustave, Nicole Noren, Soraya...

The Abolition of Man: Appendix: The Tao

Here I continue our discussion of C. S. Lewis’s book The Abolition...

The Wall That Heals

  The Wall That Heals I remember the Vietnam War. I was...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube