Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

For avoidance of doubt, this is what I think about the CBO report

Last updated on: February 6, 2014 at 10:02 am   by Jane the Actuary

For avoidance of doubt, this is what I think about the CBO report 2014-02-06T10:02:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So I wrote about the CBO report last night, and, in the end, was pretty tired after I finished really working through it and summarizing it.

But here are the key points that people don’t seem to understand, as I read through blog posts and comments:

1) The CBO projection is for the years 2017 and afterwards, when they assume the economy will be “back to normal.” These are 2% fewer hours worked than would have otherwise been the case, assuming a healthy economy. They agree that, in the short-term, the labor force drop-outs or scale-backers will be replaced by other workers currently unemployed, but figure that won’t always be the case. If your expectation is that the job market will be lousy for generations to come, then, indeed, moving the marginally-attached out in favor of those who want to work isn’t as much of a problem. Which means that your opinion on the impacts of the ACA will be bound up with your opinion of the future of the American economy, and how well or poorly it will adapt to the imacts of globalization, immigration, technology, etc., on the nature and number of jobs.

2) The CBO projection looks at total hours worked — if a person leaves their job to find fulfillment as a freelance writer, but spends as much time working on a self-employed basis, this counts as no net effect.

3) Some of the CBO’s forecasted impacts are due to the really hideous cliffs — as has been pointed out, there are cases where an extra dollar earned in pay causes a loss of subsidies worth $10,000 or even $20,000. And some of them are just because, with the government subsidies, people need less wage income to maintain the same standard of living, which would be the case with any sort of universal coverage benefit. This is certainly the case for early retirees, and I can easily envision someone sitting down with a financial planner, working out a reasonable 401(k) withdrawal pattern, and adding in the (now reduced) cost of health insurance into their budget, to see more favorable numbers than a pre-ACA calculation would have generated.

4) The CBO doesn’t, as far as I can tell, factor in the potential impact on the overall economy, of more people collecting subsidies than forecast, except to say that it improves the economy due to “stimulus” type deficit spending. For clarity, I think this is a Bad Thing and am skeptical of Keynesian multipliers, which seem to be “proven” only by virtue of citing numbers produced by models.

5) Yes, the comments by Democrats defending the ACA who speak of no longer being tied to a job as “liberating” are flaky. It’s tempting to jump in and vent about how we are not a wealthy enough country to be able to support large numbers of people not working, or not working to their full capacity, due to the provision of government subsidies to meet their living expenses. But it’s clear that most of these comments are made based on the need to rise to ObamaCare’s defense. And some of it is a bit murky: retiring at 65 and collecting Medicare is OK, but retiring at 64 and collecting subsidies is “feeding at the public trough”? A couple where one party, in the future, decides to work part-time after the baby is born, because they can swing the finances, is a “taker”? Just because the Democrats are spouting out nonsense about finding fulfillment outside of the corporate world doesn’t mean you have to take their spin at face value.

6) It’s a model, people. All models are based on underlying assumptions which may or may not be correct.

7) Do you think the CBO is hiring? Do you think they’d hire an actuary, to work remotely and part-time, with somewhat weak technical skills?

Uncategorized

Previous Post



February 6, 2014

On Marriage and the Priesthood

Next Post



February 6, 2014 Anyone have experience using a pizza peel?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which king of Babylon saw the handwriting on the wall?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Cyrus Darius Nebuchadnezzar Belshazzar

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Don’t Miss Out on the Right Kind of...

I have a friend who observes my adult daughters, my sons-in-law, and...

Some obscure footnotes of white evangelical history

The Tallulah Bankhead photo will be explained below.

I came here freely, with neither garlic nor...

  A new installment of our short video-documentary series Becoming Brigham was...

It Is Written – Keeping An Account Of...

    Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for...

Feeling Small, Examining Beliefs, and Getting Bigger

Feeling Small, Examining Beliefs, and Getting Bigger One of my grandfathers, nicknamed...

What the Guilty Taught Me, and What I...

Guest writer: Pilgrim. A Pilgrim at the Prison Table. Then the Lord...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube