Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Do you trust your congressman?

Last updated on: December 4, 2013 at 8:22 am   by Jane the Actuary

Do you trust your congressman? 2013-12-04T08:22:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Drudge this morning links to an article in the “Quorum Report” (a site I’d never seen before) claiming that House Speaker John Boehner told “various Texas business interests” that he would schedule immigration votes after the filing deadline for the 2014 elections.  In other words, the implication is that he would hold votes only after it was too late for upset citizens to protest by fielding a candidate to primary an amnesty-supporting GOP congressman. 

If this is true, this means that there are a lot of Republican congressmen out there who want to vote for amnesty but fear their constituents’ reactions.  And, of course, on top of this, the further news is that Boehner’s new Immigration Policy Director is an amnesty supporter coming out of McCain’s staff. 

Does Boehner, do these secret amnesty supporters truly believe that we can achieve that promised one-time amnesty, that the aspirational enforcement measures will truly lead to genuine enforcement and end the current situation of, ahem, “undocumented immigrants” working under the table or with a false/stolen ID?  If so, they’re so naïve that this alone should disqualify them from office.

Or do they support an unrestricted guest worker program which, in some versions, was claimed to be a permanent solution to the illegal immigrant issue because any prospective immigrant could seek guest worker status?  (And anyone who thinks that the guest worker program proposed in the Senate bill had sufficient protections for American workers is also fooling themselves, given that the economic conditions in which guest workers would make sense, low-skilled jobs so plentiful and workers so scarce, that wages skyrocket, are so far removed from our current situation.)

Do these amnesty supporters just want amnesty, plain and simple, and fundamentally don’t care about whether a bargain to reduce future illegal immigration succeeds?  And, if so, is it out of personal convictions, believing the arguments about the injustice of the current situation?  Is it out of an extreme libertarianism, in which borders should be open and there’s nothing wrong with low/un-skilled American workers being forced to compete with any number of unskilled Mexicans willing to live 10 to a room to send money back home?  Is it due to principled support of business interests who want to keep wages low?  Or is it to keep the campaign cash flowing from those business supporters?

And — regardless of the reason for their support of amnesty — are there really that many congressmen planning on telling their constituents one thing and, ultimately, voting the other way in hopes of short voter memories? 

Hence, the title of this post.  Who are these congressmen?  Not mine — she’s a Democrat who’s very open about amnesty.  Are there a cadre of GOP congressmen who, like the pro-life Democrats from conservative districts who lost their elections after they voted for ObamaCare with its fig-leaf abortion-related protections, want to vote for amnesty but need to play dirty politics to hide their intentions from their own constituents?  And if so, should they be pre-emptively primaried?

Uncategorized

Previous Post



December 3, 2013

Naan!

Next Post



December 7, 2013 How do you solve a problem like "Maria"?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is the "chosen lady" addressed in a New Testament letter?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Lydia Mary Phoebe Unspecified church

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

'Super Scam Me' Exposes AI Jon Bon Jovi...

Leslie Pickett believed she was in a relationship with Jon Bon Jovi....

The Brazilian Remake of Kendricks' 'Flywheel' Opens in...

“Flywheel,” the story that launched the Kendrick Brothers’ filmmaking career is getting...

The Dangers of Gradual Accommodation (Winking at Sin)

Recently, the “law of gradualness” resurfaced during the opening of a weeklong,...

The Iron Gates and the Lion of the...

  Yesterday, I didn't finish my report about, well, yesterday.  So I'll...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube