Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Single Parenting: It’s about the women?

Last updated on: November 9, 2013 at 10:25 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Single Parenting: It’s about the women? 2013-11-09T22:25:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So a while ago, I wrote a post in which I said that the key to the problem of children born into single-parent homes is the men: women get the rewards of motherhood, plus state and social services supports, so their motivation to avoid pregnancy is small compared to a man who genuinely believes he’s going to lose half his income for the next 18 years.

But on the other hand — there are very clear obstacles to demanding men to step up, in our present-day culture and legal system.

Chief among them is the issue of abortion. Up until the child is born (based on the broad definition of health in Doe v. Boulton), an expectant mother may get an abortion — thus making her own decision not to “step up.” And, of course, the expectant father has no say in the decision. But as soon as the baby is born, we expect him to make a commitment to the child in a way that, up to this point, hadn’t been demanded of the mother. It’s very difficult to deliver this message — a woman has “choice” but a man does not, once the child is conceived — and expect the father to, in all cases, fully accept this obligation.

On top of this — “society” (that is, politicians, leaders of political and social organizations, pundits, decision-makers of all kind — has made it taboo to say that a child needs a father. Sociologists come out with studies demonstrating that children raised by two gay or lesbian parents are no worse off than those raised by a married mother and father (so far as I know, these studies are all of self-selected same-sex couple volunteers, thus deficient in the requirements for a valid random sample), and the upper middle-class Murphy Browns, choosing to conceive with a sperm-donor father, are equally insistent that their children are not being deprived to any meaningful degree due to the lack of a father in their lives.

How can we tell a man that his active love and care of his child is important for that child’s well-being when so many groups, and Experts, and Powers That Be, in general, insist that it’s not, that he offers nothing special that can’t be replaced by an uncle, family friend, or just a second mother?

And if the man, as father, is nothing special, we’re left with an insistence that he parent because he’s obliged — and yet that obligation is so contingent. If the mother aborts, the obligation is gone. If she choses to raise the child on her own (either absolving him of responsibility or never telling him in the first place), the obligation is no more — unless she applies for welfare, at any rate. How can we expect a man to take the parenting obligation seriously if he’s told that he’s replaceable, and that the obligation is so dependent on the mother’s own decision?

So, really, the only way to reasonably expect men to step up is if they’re consistently told that their parenting role is important and necessary. And we can’t get from here to there, while at the same time saying, “there’s nothing wrong with a woman having a child without a father.”

Which means we’re back to the fact that we, as a society, have to be able to say: “don’t get pregnant unless you’re married” and even: “don’t do things which have a measurable probability of getting pregnant unless you’re married.” But we can’t. It’s practically unthinkable. It’s unjustly imposing a fanatical Christian morality. Etc.

Not long ago, Illinois passed a law mandating that any sex ed class include “comprehensive” education rather than having the option of an “abstainence-only” approach. What this means in practice isn’t entirely clear — the Chicago Public Schools has online a policy document which briefly lists the curriculum in each grade (but confusingly: “causes of HIV transmission” are included in 4th grade but “human reproduction” in 5th grade — does this mean that children learn about sex as a cause of disease earlier than they learn about sex as the cause of pregnancy?) For teens, they offer the Teen Outreach Program: “a nine-month curriculum that addresses such topics as relationships, peer pressure, decision making, values clarification, goal-setting, adolescent development, and sexual health.” One suspects that “values clarification” means the same kind of “wait until you’re ready before you have sex” instruction promoted by Planned Parenthood and similar organizations.

I find myself wondering whether teens are hearing from anyone the instruction “wait until you’re married to have children” (or the parallel instruction “to have sex”). “Wait until you’re mature enough” is hardly an effective message for teens who are well-known for overestimating their maturity level — and there’s a substantial contingent of “progressives” who aren’t particularly troubled by teen sex in any case, if they’re perfectly comfortable with long-term contraception (implants) and abortion as back-up birth control in any case. At best, one suspects that they’re hearing “wait until you’ve finished your education” or the like. Are they even hearing, “wait for someone who would be a responsible parent?” Unlikely.

So, look, I still don’t have an answer . . . maybe next time!

Uncategorized

Previous Post



November 8, 2013

Meanwhile, at my day job. . .

Next Post



November 9, 2013 November 9th


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Psalm opens with "Blessed is the man"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 23 Psalm 119 Psalm 1 Psalm 51

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Problem with False Prophets

Miller’s Station UMC| 10/18/26| Anchor Verse: Jeremiah 23: 1, 9-23   I...

Emotion in Early Christianity by Andrew Crislip

Andrew Crislip’s Emotion in Early Christianity examines an often overlooked dimension of...

16 Spiritual Touchstones for a More Grounded Life

  After decades of spiritual study, here are 16 principles I try...

Catholic Evangelization: Sharing Your Faith Every Day

Welcome back to the Graceful Awakening mini-series called, “From Faith to Mission.” ...

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube