Rent-to-own . . . tires

Last updated on: October 17, 2013 at 11:08 pm by Jane the Actuary

Rent-to-own . . . tires 2013-10-17T23:08:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I finally got new tires on the car yesterday, something that was on the to-do list to take care of before winter, or, specifically before travelling at Thanksgiving. I hate car expenses, not so much for the cost of it, as for the feeling that I’m being taken advantage of by the guy trying to upsell or get me to buy a service I don’t need. (Like the time I had the mechanic tell me I needed a new alternator, when I was a grad student and chose to drive the car until it died for completely unrelated reasons later instead.) But in any case, I’m always grateful that we don’t live paycheck-to-paycheck and such expenses don’t cause problems for our family finances. And I was reminded of the article I read a while back on rent-to-own tire stores (this article is in the Los Angeles Times, but, re-reading it, it seemed very familiar and I suspect that it was this very article that appeared in the Trib). Here’s the thing: tires are now so expensive, and yet such a necessity for poor families with aging cars, that they’re willing to pay what amounts to more than 100% annual interest for the opportunity to buy tires on installment. And since these are rent-to-own contracts, rather than loans, the contract is iron-clad, even in bankruptcy, and the company can literally reposess the tires and leave the car on cinderblocks if the consumer defaults. So, yes, even someone living paycheck-to-paycheck should stay ahead of the game in whatever way they can, knowing the cost of an unexpected expense, whether it’s a new tires or brakes, or replacing a furnace, or a hospital bill, will cost far more if it’s paid with a high-interest loan than if the money was in the bank in the first place. But at the same time, for someone whose income is truly as low as to be desperate, a large part of the answer is to not be at risk of such expenses. Most obviously, if you can’t afford sudden home repair expenses, you shouldn’t be a homeowner, but have the predictable cost of renting. (And the government shouldn’t be in the business of pushing people with marginal income into homeownership.) And the big expense of car ownership? Well, in a perfect world (or, say, in Europe), public transportation would be sufficiently well-developed that car ownership isn’t a dire necessity; failing that, I suppose, an alternate answer would be used-car a leasing arrangement, with maintenance and repairs included in the price, and low-deductible insurance. Which leaves the third big expense of medical bills — for which there historically really hadn’t been an answer (given that even non-profit hospitals, rather than intentionally providing charity care, deem writing off bad debt as a form of charity), and it’s unclear whether the Obamacare subsidies will have solved the issue or not. In any case, remember how periodically people will say that, just as the Catholic Church used to consider money-lending a sin and have now changed their minds, they could do the same with contraception, for instance, just reclassifying it? Up until the High Middle Ages, moneylending generally took the form of lending to the poor, who had no hope of repaying the loan, but would be trapped in debt — so that the morally correct choice was charity rather than enslaving loans. Only in the High Middle Ages did the economy develop to a degree that moneylending became a way of financing business transactions and trade, and, ultimately, the prohibition of moneylending was ended because the very nature of moneylending was different. Here’s the thing: I believe in free markets. But when people resort to these sort of extremely-high-interest loans, it’s a symptom of a much bigger problem.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 17, 2013

So here's a crazy suggestion on the busted exchanges. . .

Next Post

October 18, 2013 Aldi is hiring!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many Beatitudes are in the Sermon on the Mount?

Select your answer to see how you score.

10 7 8 12