The Anti-Adoption Movement?

Last updated on: September 8, 2013 at 6:26 pm by Jane the Actuary

The Anti-Adoption Movement? 2013-09-08T18:26:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Eric Zorn’s Change of Subject column links to a New Republic article on the anti-adoption movement — birthparents who feel they were deceived by adoption agencies, and their supporters. Among the deceptive practices they list are money given them for pregnancy expenses, pressure to decide in the 24 hours after childbirth, promises by the adoptive parents to keep the birth mother in their life, and failure to provide information on the father’s responsibility to provide child support, welfare benefits available, etc. They say that the birthmother’s experience is traumatic and the loss she feels is continual.

I’ve read of a similar movement in Australia, where their ultimate goal was that, in the rare circumstance in which a mother would not or could not parent her child, the new relationship formed with caretakers be that of guardianship only, with the mother remaining, in law, the mother.

But here’s the catch: a part of the argument appears to be that any woman in financial difficulties due to a pregnancy, and who can’t afford to care for the child independently should be given as much State support (that is, welfare) as it takes.

What of the woman who simply doesn’t want to be pregnant?

I suppose if you’re “prochoice” in the sense that you think abortion has no moral significance and is just a medical procedure like any other, than the answer is that a woman who wants her child keeps it and a woman who doesn’t, aborts.

This “anti-adoption” movement has no room for a woman who doesn’t want to be a mother, but likewise feels that abortion is morally wrong. I’m not sure if, in their world, no pregnant woman would ever not want to be a mother, or if they simply take for granted that abortion is the right and proper response for unwillingly-pregnant women, or if they simply believe the genetic connection is paramount, and so sacred that it must never be severed.

What’s particularly sad is that poor women have likewise absorbed this anti-adoption attitude and turned it into, “it’s better to get an abortion than to give a child up for adoption, because at least then you don’t have to wonder about what happened to the baby.” Even women and girls who believe that abortion is killing a human being say that this is a better choice than adoption, “better dead than adopted,” I guess. (– based on articles I’ve read in the past and books interviewing these women.)

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 8, 2013

The Other "Other Pension Crisis"

Next Post

September 9, 2013 Is IBM's move to "exchanges" the end of employer-sponsored healthcare as we know it?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many years did Jacob work for Rachel before he married her?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Twenty Three Seven Fourteen