Pullman National Park?

Last updated on: October 11, 2016 at 9:50 pm by Jane the Actuary

Pullman National Park? 2016-10-11T21:50:16-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Editorial in the Tribune today — a small issue in the grand scheme of things, but disturbing, nonetheless: there are plans in motion to name the Pullman neighborhood a National Park. Not a Historic Landmark, or even a National Historic Site, but a National Park. And the Tribune calls on Obama, in service to his hometown, to skip the subsequent economic feasibility study and act of Congress and declare it so.

To be sure, the neighborhood, formerly the company town of the Pullman passenger rail cars, then the site of the strike that led to the first black union, the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, is from all reports, a neighborhood of charming architecture, though fallen on hard times. And the Tribune hopes that National Park designation will be a spur for tourism and general neighborhood revitalization. (Indeed, they are very focused on Obama taking an action as president to shower favor on the neighborhood, suggesting that it might, alternatively, be the site of his Presidential Library.)

But — wow. Digging a little further, I learned that the “resource study” was conducted at the behest of the now-disgraced Jesse Jackson, Jr.

Here’s what the National Park Conservation Association has to say about this proposal: “And since the site is just 15 miles south of downtown Chicago, Pullman could become one of the very few “commutable” national parks. Countless families and schoolchildren could have their first national park experience for the price of a train ticket.”

(Irritatingly, I can’t find the actual study anywhere online.)

But a National Park isn’t a place to be visited solely because of the designation “National Park” and it’s not a means of delivering federal largesse to a community. Or, at least, not the last I checked.

And a “national park experience” should mean something more than just being at a location designated “national park.”

I’m having trouble even following the logistics here. Will the homes remain privately-owned, just with (it’s hoped) tourists filling the streets? Are the vacant buildings to be built out into visitors’ centers and museums (with the further costs of building a generously-sized museum)? And how much of a museum can you make solely out of the topic of unionization? Or is the purpose of the designation just to have the label “National Park” with a small office for passport-stamping, and to further the goal of “equitable” distribution of national parks in a bean-counting sort of way?

Has the National Park Service become, like any other government agency, more interested in its own growth and budget, and boosting “park attendance” numbers by increasing park count, than meeting its mission?

This is mission creep. This is brand dilution, if “national park” doesn’t even merit being a AAA Starred Attraction. For the National Park Service to become just another means of delivering pork is shameful. And for the Chicago Tribune to make a pitch for national park designation solely for economic benefits is equally wrong.

Uncategorized

National Parks

Previous Post

September 15, 2013

"Drink more water"?

Next Post

September 17, 2013 Does "aging in place" really make sense?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is commended in 3 John for walking in the truth?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gaius Diotrephes Philemon Demetrius