Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Fill in the blank: (on retirement)

Last updated on: August 16, 2016 at 9:47 am   by Jane the Actuary

Fill in the blank: (on retirement) 2016-08-16T09:47:27-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Regardless of what kind of Social Security system the government might implement in the future, everyone over the age of ____ should have their basic needs met by the government if they have no other resources, regardless of their work history (or lack thereof) in their younger years, without being expected to work at any available job or being expected to continually search for work.

What’s the age?

Those on the far left would say there should be no age threshold at all, of course, and that work requirements for welfare are an injustice since any individual who’s not working or looking for work can be trusted to have a good reason not to be doing so.

Some ambitious Social Security reformers have pegged that age as 75 or so — or, at least, careless blog comment posters do so when they speculate that that’s the age at which we need to fix Normal Retirement.

The answer is somewhere in-between — 70 at most, I’d say, but I don’t have a good feel about where to peg this; it’d have to be based on research on health and aging rather than blind life expectancy calculations.

Some Western European countries (I want to say Belgium, as an example, though I’d have to look it up) have a normal retirement of 65, but have special unemployment provisions in the 5 or 10 years prior to this point, in which unemployment effectively becomes unreduced early retirement, with the employer required to chip in an additional amount, in the case in which an employee is “legitimately” laid off (as opposed to voluntarily or semi-voluntarily terminating). 

In the U.S., for too many near-retirees, Social Security disability effectively serves as an unemployment benefit, when they’ve exhausted other resources.

Fundamentally, that’s one of the key purposes of Social Security — to meet the material needs of the elderly who are no longer capable of work without taxing their strength.  And indeed, based on our (admittedly poor) measures of poverty level, 90% of Social Security-aged people are above the poverty line (though our determination of what income “counts” in this calculation is a bit goofy — Soc Sec counts as “earned income” even though, for the very low income, it has been “earned” to an even lesser degree than for others, but means-tested benefits such as SSI, food stamps, Medicaid, subsidized senior housing, etc., do not — which means that this 90% figure doesn’t adequately measure how many Social Security-aged individuals are in material need (lack of nutritious food, ill-housed, etc.), which I suspect is a much smaller number. 

The need for this basic anti-poverty benefit will always be there, and every “provident fund”/mandatory saving-type Social Security system includes some kind of basic minimum benefit, whether as a flat amount for everyone (Sweden, I think — I need to look this up), or an automatic but clawed-back benefit (Australia), or a welfare-type benefit which one must apply for, similar to welfare for active workers but without the “actively looking for work” requirement (Hong Kong).

The question is, what sort of anti-poverty benefit makes the most sense, is fairest, easiest to administer, and most affordable to the country, and how generous should such a benefit be?

Actuarial/Retirement Issues

Previous Post



August 19, 2013

Is "I just won't retire" a feasible solution?

Next Post



August 20, 2013 Is declining attendance at National Parks a problem?


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the name of the great final battle in Revelation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

The Great Tribulation Babylon’s Fall Apocalypse Armageddon

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

Trust an Actuary: The Social Security Fairness Act...

Jane the Actuary

Family

"Jane the Actuary," the actuary - an update...

Jane the Actuary

Family

No Free Lunch, Canadian Social Security edition

Jane the Actuary

Family

The "child care calculator" from an actuary's point...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Thoughts about Halloween

We are approaching the date of our new American national holiday: October...

Letters on Living the Faith by C.S. Lewis

Most of us met C.S. Lewis as a public intellectual. Mere Christianity....

When Halloween Unmasks Married Hearts

Written by Dr. David K. Ewen from Eternal Truth Bible College Behind...

Jesus Was Not an Aristotelian

Aristotle. He’s been called the father of logic, the father of the...

Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey

Situated on the same square is Methodist Central Hall and Westminster Abbey. ...

57th Dove Awards Honor Dolly Parton, Crown New...

On gospel music’s biggest night, the 57th annual GMA Dove Awards honored...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube