Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

“Michigan AG challenges judge’s ruling that Detroit bankruptcy is unconstitutional”

Last updated on: July 19, 2013 at 5:50 pm   by Jane the Actuary

“Michigan AG challenges judge’s ruling that Detroit bankruptcy is unconstitutional” 2013-07-19T17:50:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What a mess!

In the private sector, employers cannot cut back accrued pension benefits (though they can freeze and eliminate future accruals), but, the same time, should an employer go bankrupt, the PBGC — Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation — pays out the benefits based on “insurance premiums” paid into the PBGC over the life of the plan.

In the public sector, there is no similar entity — there is no “insurance”-type arrangement.  But to say that the city of Detroit is obliged to pay these benefits, regardless of the fact that the city government should have never promised to pay them in the first place — it defies common sense.  There is no money.  Maybe the bankruptcy proceeding has to go even further, and dissolve the corporate entity called “City of Detroit”?  Then the land area “formerly known as Detroit” becomes unincorporated, as, say, Detroit Township, wiped clean of all of the “City of Detroit”s obligations?

A bit Swiftian of a solution, to sure — but maybe not?

(Of course, Illinois, my current home, has the same pension mess on a statewide scale, but without the absolute lack of money to go along with it.  If I were czar, or even moderately influential, I’d advocate for a constitutional amendment that neither the state nor any governmental body in the state, can promise employee benefits payable in future years.  Not retiree health care, not pension benefits — the unions can run collect contributions and run Taft-Hartley Multi-Employer if they like instead.)

Uncategorized

Previous Post



July 19, 2013

Are clotheslines hip?

Next Post



July 19, 2013 Enough of the schadenfreude! (more on Detroit)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does the Bible say about parents and children?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Spoil your children Let them do as they wish Fathers, do not provoke your children Never instruct

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

'You Can See Everything': A Film Without a...

If you're looking to find the hero in the strange and riveting...

Westminister Abbey-- Part Two

One can get either depressed or impressed by walking around on the...

Theodore Dwight Weld: Evangelical Poster Boy to Drop...

Last time I discussed the spiritual crisis that engulfed Angelina Grimké in...

Jesus and the Law of Moses: An Interview...

It is my pleasure to interview Paul Sloan on his recent book,...

How Does Ặnāvâ Connect Katie Zacharia & Georgia?

This weekend, the big news has been the sudden departure of Trump’s...

The Woman We Remember by Her Wound

Śūrpaṇakhā Had a Heart Desire, humiliation, and the woman behind a turning...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube