Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

janetheactuary

Catastrophic health care plans?

Last updated on: July 25, 2013 at 2:19 pm   by Jane the Actuary

Catastrophic health care plans? 2013-07-25T14:19:00-06:00 Jane the Actuary

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What do I think of Catastrophic/high deductible plans?

They have their plusses and minuses.  My employer (which shall be nameless) think’s they’re the best thing going, both in terms of how they advise clients and how they structure their own benefit offerings (the non-catastrophic offerings’ employee premiums are so much higher than the catastrophic plan that you could meet your entire deductible every year and still pay less than if you elected a non-cat. plan).

It is true that they require consumers to behave as consumers, thinking before they rush into some treatement or another about whether it’s really necessary or the most cost-effective choice.  For instance:  can I use an over-the-counter treatment for my wart, or do I need to see a dermatologist?  Should I see the doctor about my swollen knee, or call the nurse helpline first?  What’s the cheapest way to get the recommended MRI done, and is it really necessary?

There are a couple problems with this approach, though.  In general, we lack the information necessary to really act as consumers.  Despite some attempts by insurers to make this information available, we generally don’t have data on what the most cost-effective way is of getting a certain treatment (e.g., hospital vs. outpatient center, and which one), and hospitals are generally unwilling to provide it.  Doctors don’t know the cost of the procedures they refer patients for (especially to the extent that they vary by health plan), and aren’t accustomed to thinking in terms of cost-effectiveness (in terms of advising a patient on whether a given procedure is medically necessary, will just provide additional peace of mind, or is even not proven at all).  And patients are often ill-equipped to make these decisions for themselves.

Ultimately, this means that many people would be better off under a system that doesn’t really exist now:  one in which primary care physicians manage the patient’s healthcare with an eye to both quality of treatment and cost of the treatment, telling a patient “no” when necessary and supervising all aspects of the patient’s care, within and outside of that practice’s office.  HMOs were supposed to work this way, but they never succeeded, for multiple reasons, and Kaiser in California is the one large insurer structured in a “staff model” approach, but, so far as I know, isn’t extraordinarily successful at keeping costs down.  (Note to self:  try to find out why Kaiser doesn’t “work”.)

Also, is self-pay for small medical expenses cheaper (by avoiding administrative costs) than running everything through insurance, in the same way that we don’t expect our oil changes to be covered by auto insurance?  One difference is that medical expenses are cumulative over the year — we expect each expense to apply to a cumulative deductible, rather than having each expense treated individually.  For a car, if I have small bumper damage, I’d pay for that without contacting the insurance company, since I know it’ll be under the deductible, but if I want my doctor’s visit to apply to the deductible, there are administrative costs to that, regardless of whether the insurance company reimburses the provider or just reports, “the patient hasn’t satisfied the deductible.”  In fact, in a scenario in which small routine expenses are not even counted toward the deductible at all, I’m generally still better off submitting the claim through insurance to benefit from the negotiated rate.

There are a lot of pieces to the puzzle of why health care costs are so high and what to do about it — for many people, catastrophic plans can be a component of successful cost-control, but it’s far from a solution in itself.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



July 25, 2013

Tax reform: one small proposal

Next Post



July 26, 2013 Healthcare again: overall cost and individual cost as two separate problems


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Actuarial/Retirement Issues Politics Uncategorized

Select a Month September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 December 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 August 2021 June 2021 April 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Salem" (as in Melchizedek, king of Salem) mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Light Ark Joy Peace

Related posts from Jane the Actuary

Family

A September 11th Reflection

Jane the Actuary

Family

Illinois’ Assisted Suicide Law is, yes, literally deadly

Jane the Actuary

Family

Revising the "Disability [Pride] Flag"

Jane the Actuary

Family

In which I comment on the Supreme Court...

Jane the Actuary

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Pope's Oct Prayer Intention: For Mental Health Ministry

Pope Leo's prayer intention for October is, as it seems to be...

Don’t Miss Out on the Right Kind of...

I have a friend who observes my adult daughters, my sons-in-law, and...

Some obscure footnotes of white evangelical history

The Tallulah Bankhead photo will be explained below.

I came here freely, with neither garlic nor...

  A new installment of our short video-documentary series Becoming Brigham was...

It Is Written – Keeping An Account Of...

    Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for...

Feeling Small, Examining Beliefs, and Getting Bigger

Feeling Small, Examining Beliefs, and Getting Bigger One of my grandfathers, nicknamed...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube