Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Technology and Religion
How Fear of AI Makes Us Worse Teachers

How Fear of AI Makes Us Worse Teachers

Last updated on: February 4, 2026 at 1:59 am by Brad Vaughn

0 Comments

How Fear of AI Makes Us Worse Teachers 2026-01-11T18:11:08-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Credit: Creative Commons

We are living through a quiet crisis in education, and it is not primarily a technological one. It is a crisis of fear. The rise of AI unsettles teachers for good reason. Students can now generate passable essays in seconds. The old signals of authorship (i.e., grammar, fluency, sophistication) no longer mean what they once did. Something very real has changed.

But what’s been even more alarming than the technology itself is the speed with which many schools have responded by shrinking the very thing they exist to teach.

Catching Cheaters Is Ruining Education

Across the country, departments are quietly retreating from extended writing and replacing it with in-class essays and tightly controlled environments. The logic seems obvious: if students can cheat outside of class, then bring all writing inside. If AI can generate essays, then you simply need to eliminate the conditions under which it can be used.

It feels responsible. It feels firm and safe. And it is a disaster. Why? Because in the rush to secure authorship, we sacrifice formation.

Education, at its best, is not about producing artifacts that can be authenticated. It is about shaping minds… slowly, imperfectly, through drafts, revisions, hesitations, and rethinking. Writing is not merely how students display what they know; it’s how they come to know it.

When you remove extended writing, you’re not just changing the logistics of assessment. You amputate one of the central ways students learn how to think.

Long-form writing trains habits that cannot be replicated under time pressure. It forces students to live with a problem long enough to realize they do not understand it. It requires them to test claims against texts. This kind of writing gives them space to revise in light of new insight. It cultivates intellectual humility: the awareness that first thoughts are rarely best thoughts.

In-class essays train something else. They train speed and fluency. They teach risk management. In-class essays instill the ability to sound coherent under pressure.

Those are not worthless skills. But they are not the same skills.

A student who can speak quickly and a student who can think deeply are not the same person. A student who can generate polished prose on demand is not necessarily a student who can reason well, revise carefully, or hold a complex idea steady long enough to refine it.

When schools replace extended essays with in-class writing, they quietly redefine what it means to be educated. They exchange formation for performance.

The Bitter Irony of AI Surveillance

Want to hear what’s truly ironic? This shift does not even solve the AI problem it is meant to address.

Students do not need a keyboard in front of them to use AI. They can consult it at home for summaries, interpretations, outlines, and arguments. They can memorize phrasing and internalize structures. Likewise, they can rehearse ideas generated elsewhere and then reproduce them under supervision.

So what has changed? Not the influence of AI on their thinking, but only where the typing happens.

The policy feels strict, but it’s superficial. It targets the surface of cheating, not its substance. The most determined students will adapt immediately. Meanwhile, the students who actually need time, feedback, and revision (i.e., the ones who benefit most from the extended process) are the ones being punished.

That is the perverse outcome of fear-based reform: integrity-minded students lose the most.

A deeper philosophical problem lurks beneath all this. When schools shift to in-class-only writing, they tacitly adopt a new vision of education: one in which the primary goal is not intellectual growth but complying with procedures.

The teacher becomes less a mentor of thought and more a gatekeeper of conditions. The student learns that the real issue is not whether the work is honest, but whether it is provably theirs.

That is not moral formation. That is a cat-and-mouse game.

Turning Classrooms into Courtrooms

Even teachers from classical education schools are making this mistake. Classical education, of all traditions, should know better. It has always been understood that truth, judgment, and character are formed through practices that take time. Teachers can’t rush virtue nor compress wisdom into a fifty-minute window. You can’t substitute surveillance for mentorship and expect to produce adults who care about truth when no one is watching.

If students learn that honesty only matters when it is enforced, then dishonesty becomes rational whenever it is not.

What actually reduces inappropriate AI use is not restriction but visibility. When students must submit outlines, drafts, revisions, reflections, and respond to feedback, the writing process becomes traceable. (My students do all their work on a Google Doc shared with me so I can see every bit of the process.)

Thinking leaves a trail. Ownership becomes legible. The teacher can see not just what the student produced but how they arrived there. That process is the antidote to AI misuse, not the vulnerability.

A single in-class essay is a black box. You see the output, but you learn almost nothing about the intellectual journey that produced it. Extended writing, when designed well, does the opposite. It makes thinking visible. It allows teachers to mentor judgment rather than police behavior.

The tragedy of the current moment is that schools are responding to a genuine challenge with a retreat from their own deepest strengths.

The question we should be asking is not, “How do we stop students from using AI?” It is, “What kind of thinkers are we trying to form?”

If we want students who can reason, revise, weigh evidence, confront counterarguments, and speak honestly about what they believe, then we must preserve the slow, difficult, beautiful work of extended writing.

If we’re willing to sacrifice that in order to catch a few more cheaters, then we’ve already lost something far more valuable than academic integrity.

We have lost the courage to teach.

Technology and Religion

Education and Religion

Previous Post

January 20, 2026

Do We Have Guilt Before All and For All?

Next Post

February 17, 2026 Seeking Pleasure and Joy Via Dopamine and Oxytocin

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"A thoughtful and thought-provoking article that raises important questions about the challenges facing the Western ..."

amelia854taylor

The War on the Western Church

"to fit social or religious expectations. Especially women, who were expected to sacrifice everything to ..."

shay049ana

3 reasons you should not be ..."

"Powerful reminder short, sturdy truths can lose their weight if treated as slogans. The solas ..."

daniel603maclise

How Western Individualism Quietly Undermines the ..."

"If 'America’s deepest crisis is not merely political. It is moral and spiritual.' is in ..."

klatu

The Real Crisis Beneath America’s Social ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who sat at the Beautiful Gate begging before Peter healed him?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A rich ruler A Roman centurion A blind man A lame man

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »