Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Three Implications of Not Having Paul’s Missionary Motive

Three Implications of Not Having Paul’s Missionary Motive

Last updated on: May 10, 2022 at 6:13 am by Brad Vaughn

Three Implications of Not Having Paul’s Missionary Motive 2022-02-06T11:17:34-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Paul’s missionary motive was to receive honor or commendation from the Lord. This is the idea that shapes Elliot Clark’s book Mission Affirmed: Recovering the Missionary Motivation of Paul. As we saw previously, Clark explains how this motive drives how he (and we) should think about mission strategy. Paul’s labor would be judged according to its lasting fruit. For this reason, he was not content to settle for metrics like speed and numbers as a measure of ministry success.

CC 4.0

Today, we conclude the series by looking at three other points that Clark highlights in his excellent book. While they are not all major themes developed in Mission Affirmed, they are still noteworthy. I will merely summarize his ideas without rehashing his entire argument.

Was Independence Paul’s Motive?

Paul’s goal was not to establish independent churches. In our day of anti-colonialist sentiment, one could easily mistake Clark’s meaning. But I think he captures his point well when he writes,

I don’t come to the conclusion that the ultimate goal of missions is self-sustaining, self-supporting, and self-propagating churches who need nothing from the missionary or sending church. Neither is it the goal to have self-funded missionaries or independent operatives who don’t rely on the locals. That’s because missions is always a cooperative partnership. Which means the solution to dependency isn’t independence. It’s interdependence. (104)

No individual believer is autonomous in the sense of not needing other Christ-followers; in the same way, no church is independent, without the need of other churches. To presume so or even to strive for such independence is to contradict Paul’s repeated emphasis on the church being a body. For example, check out Romans 12:4-8; 1 Corinthians 12:12-31; and Ephesians 4:4, 16.

It is only when we are interdependent that we exemplify the unity that God desires for his church. Unity is practical. It is not a theological idea but a formative reality. Such interdependence pleases the Father and so brings God’s commendation on Paul and us.

A False Dilemma that Minimizes Missionaries

It’s not news to say that missionaries have taken a colonialist mindset with them to the field. One consequence is that the churches and ministries they started became highly dependent on Western resources. This phenomenon is what led to the push for *self-*sustaining, *self-*supporting, and *self-*propagating churches (rather than interdependence).

On a related note, we find a shift in contemporary missionary thinking. Clark summarizes,

In our efforts to develop churches in other cultures that are self-sustaining and self-governing, we’ve somehow felt the need to diminish our own selves—including the stewardship of our training and gifting—and God’s purpose for us in that place. In such cases, we’re confronting a new hazard in global missions. It’s the danger of false humility and cultural embarrassment.

Instead of elevating the foreign worker, we now minimize the role of the Western missionary and emphasize the superiority of nationals. “They can do ministry better than we can” is the mantra of our day. And our primary objective is now seen as “empowerment,” equipping locals while we serve from the shadows and prevent any sort of Western imposition. But I think this represents a departure from [Roland] Allen’s thesis, and certainly from Paul’s method. (119)

Westerners assume a false dilemma:

EITHER missionaries are present and thus colonialist and oppressive, …

OR missionaries minimize their presence and so empower local, indigenous churches.

This framing of the situation is problematic and certainly not what we see in Scripture. First, many people today seem to be oblivious to the fact that indigenous churches can bless their mother churches just as the missionary’s church can bless the local people. This is the nature of interdependence. We can be fellow learners and recipients of blessings!

Second, Paul felt a responsibility before God for the churches he planted. He did not abandon them once they had God’s word and a little teaching. He was deeply invested in their long-term health. D. A. Carson says,

Paul is willing to mortgage his own vision of the future to the needs of the Corinthian church. If God called him to establish a church in Corinth, he cannot abandon that responsibility just because he detects new opportunities and still greater need elsewhere.[1]

Do We Spread the Virus of the Prosperity Gospel?

Finally, if we seek the Lord’s approval, we cannot be indifferent to the lifestyle and preparation of missionaries. We might be mindful to develop thoughtful strategies and biblically faithful teaching, but are we are conscientious about missionaries as people?

And I’m not merely talking about character; missionaries bring with them a culture and lifestyle habits that could undermine sustained fruitfulness. Clark explains,

Western missionaries themselves—even the best of them— carry the virus of prosperity theology latent within them. And we easily transmit it to others wherever we serve. This can happen simply by our observable lifestyle, as we instinctively gravitate toward comfort and ease in seemingly innocuous decisions about housing and entertainment, education and healthcare. Like it or not, local believers will interpret from us a Christian perspective of suffering and glory whether we overtly teach it or not. (77-78)

What do missionaries take for granted that subtly undercut their stated goals?

Consider, for instance, the desire to make disciples who are faithful in the midst of persecution and suffering. Clark addresses a contemporary form of colonialism that persists among missionaries because it is disguised and justified in various ways. He says,

I’ve known Western missionaries, working in countries with moderate persecution, who were sometimes mystified by the inability of new believers to endure hardship. Expat workers expressed frustration with locals who shied away from suffering or ran away from pain. They also wondered why those who claimed to follow Jesus would prefer to remain secret, never telling their family members or friends about the Savior.

But the sad irony I observed was that sometimes— in those very circumstances—the missionaries themselves had modeled the same secretive identity, the same avoidance of suffering, and the same inability to endure. Sadly, their new disciples weren’t diverting from the path. They were simply following their lead.

As a result, I’ve come to consider some of the ways Western missionary colonization still happens. Sure, we’re no longer exporting pews and pipe organs. We’re beyond that. But we do import our comforts and our fears. We implicitly inculcate others with our timidity, secrecy, contingency, and luxury. The great danger of cultural colonization isn’t gone; it’s only changed. We’re still making disciples in our image. (78)

Paul repeatedly urged churches to follow his example (e.g., 1 Cor 4:15-17; 11:1; Phil 3:17; 4:9; 2 Thess 3:7, 9; 2 Tim 3:10-11; cf. Acts 20:35). Likewise, he told Timothy and Titus to be worthy of imitation (1 Tim 4:12; Titus 2:7-8).

Yet, it would be unthinkable for many people to say this to other people: “Imitate me!” Why? False humility? Or an intuitive sense that we are not being the sort of disciple that we want others to imitate?

Just some food for thought.

[1] D. A. Carson, Model of Christian Maturity, 101.

Previous Post

May 3, 2022

How Honor Motivates Mission Strategy

Next Post

May 17, 2022 Protecting the Honor of Women in 1 Corinthians 11

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said: "Let us be glad and rejoice and give Him glory, for the marriage of the Lamb has come"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A voice from heaven (or the multitude) Jesus An angel John

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »