Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
How Our Expectations Influence Our Interpretation of Scripture

How Our Expectations Influence Our Interpretation of Scripture

Last updated on: March 15, 2022 at 4:18 pm by Brad Vaughn

How Our Expectations Influence Our Interpretation of Scripture 2021-12-10T02:09:24-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Credit: Creative Commons 3.0

Over a hundred years ago, Cambridge psychologist F. C. Bartlett conducted an experiment that changed the trajectory of memory studies and yet is largely ignored by Christian interpreters of the Bible.

Bartlett had educated British participants read a Native American folktale called “War of the Ghosts.” To the research subjects, the story was not only unfamiliar; it sounded bizarre. Bartlett wanted to test what happened when these Western readers attempted to recount the tale. His results have significant implications for serious readers of Scripture.

How We Change Stories

Bartlett found that participants consistently altered the folktale in predictable ways.

First, they tended to omit details perceived to be “irrelevant.” [1] However, he reminds us,

“what does appear fitting, or in place, is determined by social environment and training, as well as by individual temperament and education” (Bartlett, 1917).

The story’s central emphasis was hidden from view because the story appeared “haphazard” to a modern Western reader. Bartlett notes several distortions that arise when his study participants attempt to reproduce the story into writing. For example, he says,

“In every one of the series of reproductions all mention of ghosts drops out almost immediately, and this in spite of the fact that ghosts appear in the original title” (Bartlett, 1917).

Second, readers transform what they find “unfamiliar.” In this way, the participants do not omit the information but preserve it. Thus, “canoes” become “boats,” “paddling” is changed to “rowing,” etc.

Third, images or turns-of-phrase that seem “unpleasant” are omitted. These omissions include facets of speech that didn’t fit conventional ways of thinking or speaking. Interestingly, Bartlett explains how even omitted details still exert a hidden influence on how participants recalled the story and understood its meaning.

Implications for Biblical Interpretation

Over the past century, hosts of scholars have expanded on these findings to identify ways that we all tend to distort or adapt stories and information to conform with cultural “schema” or “scripts.” These terms refer to our mental models and theories, which form our expectations and inform our interpretation of everything around us.

Consider the importance of such research for those of us who read and teach the Bible. Time and again, experiments show how readers’ expectations and “cultural schemas” cause them/us to alter the details, facts, and logic found in the stories.

Think back on the number of times you have said something like, “I have read this text a thousand times, yet I’ve never seen that before.” I’ve heard similar comments numerous times from people after they begin “reading Romans with Eastern eyes.”

Our memories are “theory-laden” and create biases in our minds when we interpret and recall information in stories.[2] Accordingly, we simply don’t see what’s there, plain as day, in the text. Or we add logic that we assume is implicit within the text but, in fact, merely conforms to our prior theological beliefs and paradigms. Likewise, we misremember or adapt details that seem trivial to us but wind up carrying a load full of meaning.

Furthermore, imagine the impact of those whom we serve through teaching. Just as we are susceptible to these problems, so also our congregation, students, and friends. They might not be stubborn but merely confused. What we say might sound haphazard because the information seems irrelevant, unfamiliar, and/or unpleasant (in the sense that Bartlett speaks above).

Once again, we must face the reality that contextualization begins biblical interpretation. We do not interpret the Bible and only then contextualize its message.

A Warning and Suggestion

Much more could be and has been said about how we should respond and improve our reading of Scripture. For now, I’ll note two ideas that stand out to me as I read Bartlett.

1. Moralizing

The more Bartlett’s study participants reconstructed the story from memory, the more they tended to moralize the story. Their accounts evolved after enough details were omitted, adapted, or added unwittingly. Such moralizing did not reflect at all the original plot and meaning of the story to its near-context hearers.

This moralizing tendency should remind us of much contemporary Christian preaching and writing. How far might we be straying from the Bible’s actual Story because we are not attentive to our cognitive biases and the way that culture affects how we interpret Scripture?

2. Pay extra attention to details

Bartlett states,

“Very often details which appear to be trivial to any persons not engaged in the reproductions, are really far from trivial to those who have produced the versions in question.” (Bartlett, 1917)

This problem is often apparent when comparing translations with their Hebrew/Greek sources. Still, we all fall prey to this problem. I’ll explain with an example.

Guess what happens when Old Testament scholars read several of the following words in proximity: heart, law, spirit, flesh, obey, circumcision. Their minds are immediately triggered to recall the new covenant, mainly expressed in Jeremiah 31:31-34, Ezekiel 36:26-27 (cf. Ezek 11:18-20), each building on texts like Deuteronomy 30.

These words, especially when clustered together in the New Testament, form a mental hyperlink to those Old Testament texts. This understanding affects how we read various passages, including Romans 2, which often gets misread when one’s interpretation overlooks Paul’s allusion to the New Covenant and its fulfillment among the Gentiles. (I dive into this more in RRwEE).

Some people who claim to be “people of the Bible” might get defensive at the ideas shared in this post. However, a love for God’s word demands that we be humble enough to recognize our limits and invite the global and historical church to shape our reflections.

[1] Noteworthy publications include Frederic Bartlett, Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology (Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, 1932); “Some Experiments on the Reproduction of Folk-Stories.” Folklore 31, no. 1 (Mar. 30, 1920), pp. 30-47.

[2] Hirt, E. R., McDonald, H. E., and Markman, K. D. “Expectancy Effects in Reconstructive Memory: When the past is just what we expected.” Pages 62-89 in Truth in Memory. Edited by S. J. Lynn and K. M. McConkey. The Guilford Press, 1998.

Contextualization

Interpretation/Exegesis

biblical interpretation

contextual interpretation

psychology

Previous Post

March 8, 2022

The Cost and Reward of People Movements

Next Post

March 22, 2022 My review of Chiang Kai-Shek’s Politics of Shame

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Apocalypse" mean in Greek?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Judgment Victory Revelation Destruction

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »