Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Status Games are Inherently Groupish

Status Games are Inherently Groupish

Last updated on: January 18, 2022 at 4:20 pm by Brad Vaughn

Status Games are Inherently Groupish 2021-12-09T08:15:19-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Credit: Public Domain

People think that seeking status primarily occurs among individuals. This impression masks an important underlying dynamic: Status competitions arise within a particular community as well as between communities.

(NOTE: Part one of the series explains the fundamental dynamics of a “status game.” This series highlights several insights from Will Storr’s fantastic new book The Status Game: One Social Position and How We Use It.)

Which Status Game is Better?

Every community is marked but its own kind of status game. Therefore, individuals do not compete for status in the abstract. One may belong to different communities and could be accustomed to playing multiple status games. At the same time, people around them might play different games. What will they do then?

Interestingly, people will actually attempt to raise the status of their own group’s games. In other words, they try to show that their status game is better than other status games. What is this mean? In effect, people attempt to show that their group’s beliefs, behaviors, and norms are somehow more virtuous, moral, and reasonable.

I think this is a critical insight that too frequently gets overlooked. As a result, we’re not even aware of when we’re playing status games and how status games affect our communities and us.

Seeking to raise the status of our group rather than directly pursue individual status has two advantages. First, groups tend to condemn individuals who seek personal status; yet groups will applaud you for seeking the group’s status. So, extolling the virtues of our group’s status games is it socially safe for a route to take. Storr says,

Within the games we play, we police each other. It’s in everyone’s interest the game remains fair and stable and that big shots are managed. But no such policing happens in status competitions between games. On the contrary, our co-players award us even more status when we behave in ways that boost our games rank and diminish that of our rivals…

Even if they’re above us in the hierarchy of games, we’ll tell stories that say we’d rather be where we are. Our game is the one: our football team, our company, our clique, our tribe, our religion. (106)

Second, increasing the status of our group is an indirect way of lifting our own status. A person is like a boat that rises with the collective tide. As we raise the group’s standing, we also get a boost individually. Storr comments,

When our games win status, we do too. When they lose, so do we. These games form our identity. We become the games we play. (2)

Defending Me Our Group

These observations have implications for our judgments and behavior. Keep in mind that we draw status from the groups we belong to. Concerning our groups, Storr says,

“If we don’t think they’re inherently statusful, how can we draw status from them?” (105)

In the interest of increasing our own status, we have strong incentives to defend our group at almost any cost.

It is not difficult to imagine how we will react when our groups come under scrutiny or critique. We will likely become defensive and quick to retaliate with disparaging remarks that cast of shadow on the reputation of the critics. To allow others to bring down our group’s status effectively amounts to a tearing down of our own. For most of us, so much of the time, this psychological tension is intolerable.

Storr adds,

“In order to believe our games are superior, we must believe its players are also superior.” (107)

Consequently, we have a deeply ingrained bias for our own in-group members. We quickly and irrationally dismiss criticism from so-called “outsiders,” whom our brains unconsciously judge as inferior.

In recent days, we’ve seen this in numerous debates concerning specific social issues and points of doctrine. These include discussions about race, gender, politics, atonement, among other topics.

As the book shows, our groupishness as humans is so primal and is proven by experiments that repeatedly demonstrate how quickly we become attached to groups. Our groupishness is triggered even when the groups are arranged arbitrarily, such as when kids randomly receive the same color shirt to wear for no other reason than by chance.

When Status Becomes Sacred

A few other dynamics are worth noting. What else follows from the fact that status games are inherently communal? Over time, one no longer gains status simply by affirming the same set of beliefs.

The author says, “Status is earned with active belief” (151). In other words, as groups become larger, requirements for earning status also increase. With more players in the game, individuals must be more active and evident in their affirmation of group values, uphold key social symbols, and defend the semi-sacred leaders of the group.[1]

Storr warns that status games quickly become “sacred” such that this active belief becomes a non-negotiable requirement for belonging and status in that group. In other words, the group now ties individual status to the degree that (s)he conforms in every way to the group’s customs, symbols, and beliefs, even if those beliefs were never before been deemed essential to the identity of that group.

The next post explores several practical implications of the research surrounding status games. This discussion is critical for understanding how to be the church and properly minister in our varied social contexts.

[1] I think this is one dynamic that led to my removal as a book reviews editor for The Gospel Coalition’s theological journal Themelios. Also, notice how often people have come to assume that criticizing certain individuals means rejecting all they say or that affirming another person means that you endorse everything that they say.

Previous Post

January 11, 2022

We all play the status game. How do you play?

Next Post

January 25, 2022 The Insatiable Search for Status

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Psalm is entirely focused on God's word, using each letter of the Hebrew alphabet?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Psalm 24 Psalm 119 Psalm 23 Psalm 51

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »