Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Amid coronavirus, America witnesses “passive-aggressive Chinese flex”

Amid coronavirus, America witnesses “passive-aggressive Chinese flex”

Last updated on: March 17, 2020 at 12:25 am by Brad Vaughn

Amid coronavirus, America witnesses “passive-aggressive Chinese flex” 2020-03-17T00:25:34-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Public Domain

People hear the word “patronage” and think of Medieval Europe or colonialism from centuries past. Patronage is alive and well in the world, even if it goes by other names.

The United States has long served as a patron to smaller countries. China is in the midst of a campaign to garner its own set of “clients.” This effort is largely directed at countries in Central Asian and Africa through its “Belt and Road” initiative. Amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, we see modern-day patronage playing out at a global level. I’ll highlight two examples in this post.

The Problem of Political Provocation

For years, the rivalry between China and the United States complicated geopolitics. The relationship between the two countries is not helped by the insistence of some people who refer to COVID-19 as the “China virus”, “Wuhan virus,” or even a “foreign virus.” Not surprisingly, China’s foreign ministry said,

“Despite the fact that the WHO has officially named this novel type of coronavirus, a certain American politician, disrespecting science and the WHO decision, jumped at the first chance to stigmatize China and Wuhan with it.”

It’s gotten to the point that both countries have accused the other of intentionally creating the COVID-19 as a bioweapon.

WHO (the World Health Organization) is well aware of this problem. The Director-General of WHO explains why they chose to use COVID-19 as a name. He said,

“[WHO] wanted to avoid stigmatizing a country or particular group, so it chose a name that did not refer to a geographical location, animals, an individual or a group of people.”

Given these dynamics, I was a bit surprised to hear the decision by Asia’s richest man, Jack Ma, co-founder and former executive chairman of Alibaba. He announced last Friday that he would donate 500,000 testing kits and 1 million masks to the United States.

What surprised me is not that he would donate; rather, I was intrigued by the fact that China allowed him. In light of recent tensions, it would be very in keeping with China’s style.

Patronage as Passive-Aggressive Politics

Jayson Georges’ definition of “patronage” is succinct yet helpful. In Ministering in Patronage Cultures, he describes patronage as “a reciprocal relationship between social unequals.” Accordingly, to assume the role of a patron is a claim of power or high status.

Governments know the symbolism attached to giving and receiving aid. China rejected offers of assistance from the U.S and Japan after the Sichuan earthquake. Similarly, Taiwan rejected China’s offers in 1999 after its own natural disaster. Giving assistance can represent a claim to a higher status. Receiving aid places one in the position of a client.

This context explains a tweet by one China watcher in response to Jack Ma’s donation:

“This is an A+++ passive aggressive Chinese flex that will come up at least 2x every conversation with an uncle from now on, but we will take what we can get!”

The gift of masks and testing kits is a poke in the eye to the Trump administration, who has not only insulted China but insisted on attacking the pandemic on its own.

Public Domain

In a statement, Ma said,

“This crisis presents a huge challenge to all humankind in a globalized world. The pandemic we face today can no longer be resolved by an individual country. Rather, we need to combat the virus by working hand-in-hand. At this moment, We can’t beat this virus unless we eliminate boundaries to resources and share our know-how and hard-earned lessons. United we stand, divided we fall!”

The phrase “working hand-in-hand” is not the best choice of words; still, in the words of WIRED magazine, the entire statement “cleverly highlights the weakness in Washington’s response to the pandemic.” The final phrase is a punch to the political gut as it has long been a favorite motto of American politicians.

Since the assistance comes through Ma, the U.S. can’t reject the assistance as easily it did with the test kits offered by WHO. Yet, everyone knows that China ultimately controls what people like Ma can do in these situations.

Do Chinese Need “Gratitude Education”?

Chinese, better than Americans, know how patronage works. To some degree, it’s built into the fabric of all societies. Patronage involves reciprocity. While the patron gives financial or material assistance, a client is expected to reciprocate in some way. In the ancient world, public praise and thanksgiving were among the most common ways a client might respond. A client would publicly extol the patron’s generosity.

Naturally, Wuhan’s top Communist Party official, Wang Zhonglin, recently suggested,

“[We] must through various channels carry out gratitude education among the citizens of the whole city as well as cadres so that they thank the general secretary [Xi Jinping], thank the communist party, listen to the party’s words, follow the party’s way, and create strong positive energy.”

No doubt, he wanted to curry favor with the country’s top leadership. However, the people in Wuhan did not respond as he hoped. What followed was an unusual display of public backlash. Journalist Chu Zhaoxin wrote on WeChat,

“If this is Wang Zhonglin’s idea, I think he needs to educate himself. You are a public servant, and your job is to serve the people.… Rather than blaming the people in Wuhan you serve for not being grateful, you should reflect and be ashamed because you and your team are not working properly.”

Many modern day attempts to play the role of patron forget something people in the past knew well. For centuries, patrons saw their actions as a part of their responsibility, their social duty. Today, however, things have changed. Political patrons now want the praise and power without the responsibility or reciprocity.

For my previous post on “Honor, Shame, and the Coronavirus”, click here.

Previous Post

March 13, 2020

Honor, Shame, and the Coronavirus

Next Post

March 18, 2020 The Relationship Between the Gospel and Justification

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the mother of Samuel?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mary Deborah Sarah Hannah

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »