Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Matthew 24:14 is Not the Great Commission Nor a Mission Strategy

Matthew 24:14 is Not the Great Commission Nor a Mission Strategy

Last updated on: November 19, 2019 at 10:23 am by Brad Vaughn

Matthew 24:14 is Not the Great Commission Nor a Mission Strategy 2019-11-19T10:23:22-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The previous post showed that we cannot define the “nations” (ethne) in the Bible by using sociologically-defined “people groups.” The word “nations” normally refer to Gentiles (i.e. non-Jews); the phrase “all nations” typically alludes to Jews-and-Gentiles. Accordingly, “nations” is a vaguer term compared to “people groups,” at least as used by contemporary missionaries.

Public Domain

Whereas the last post distinguished “nations” and “people groups,” this post questions the conventional logic underlying the mobilization of missionaries to UPGs (unreached people groups).

Basing Strategy on Ambiguous Texts

What about Matthew 24:14? Jesus says,

“And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.”

What does this verse indicate? That Jesus will return once every ethnolinguistic people group hears the gospel? The verse only speaks of proclamation, not acceptance.

Also, if we equate “all nations” with “people groups” (as is commonly done), we have to ask, “How many people groups are there?” Missiologists cannot agree. The Joshua Project says the answer depends on how we count “people groups.” Therefore, estimates range from 9,800-24,000 groups. That is a huge range.

For mission agencies that base their strategies on Matthew 24:14, hoping to hasten Christ’s return, this ambiguity presents a problem. After all, who do we try to reach? How many groups do we need to engage in order to usher in Christ’s return?

How might we need to rethink the role of Matthew 24:14 in our mission thinking?

Which Task Should We Finish?

Credit: Cedarville.edu

In a recent article, Matthew Bennett offers a “cautionary analysis of missionary language.” In a word, he laments the tendency of people to confuse the promise of Matthew 24:14 with the command of Matthew 28:19 (“make disciples…”).

Consequently, we sometimes truncate the church’s mission. The following nicely captures Bennett’s concern.

Despite this appropriate enthusiasm for the idea that the ends of the earth could soon hear the gospel, there remains a troubling conflation of promise and command in some of the literature. This conflation can lead to an overemphasis on rapidly reaching the unreached with the gospel, often at the expense of full obedience to the command to make disciples and to teach them to obey all that Christ commands.

The missionary task becomes reaching, with robust teaching being jettisoned as of secondary priority. In part, this may be due to missions strategies that root themselves in Matt 24:14, seeing in it a command to evangelize all the earth’s peoples.” (p. 37)

By “evangelize,” he refers to the task whereby Christians proclaim the message of salvation. In common parlance, evangelism is the task by which people get saved or “become Christians.” However, he says, “world evangelization is but a partial aspect of the missions task given in the Great Commission” (p. 38).

In other words, people use Matthew 24:14 to justify their making mere “converts,” not disciples.

The Meaning of Matthew 24:14

Common interpretations of Matt 24:14 are strained at best.

Evangelicals routinely use this verse as motivation for people to hasten Christ’s return. Stated baldly, the message says, “If we make sure all those UPGs have a Christian population of about 5%, then we consider them ‘reached’ and can reasonably expect Christ to return soon thereafter.”

Bennett, on the other hand, cautions against this cause-effect reading. He summarizes the essence of Matthew’s message.

God is not willing that the end might come prior to the gospel of the kingdom being proclaimed throughout the whole world and to its people. In the midst of the dark picture of the future that Jesus paints surrounding this passage, there is yet this ray of hope demonstrating that he is sovereign. (p. 39)

In other words, Jesus gives a word of encouragement. It is a promise that his kingdom will be proclaimed among all the nations despite the conflicts that surround his people. Bennett elaborates,

Jesus is not telling the disciples about a sequence of events that will cause a chain reaction. Much less can he be seen to be instructing them as to how to affect his return.

Instead Jesus’ intent is to reveal that the “end of the ages” is to be a time that will be marked both by tribulation and by universal mission: “This does not mean that all the nations will be converted before the end can come but rather that the universal proclamation will continue until the end.” (p. 41)

Bennett points out that “the word κηρυχθήσεται is a future passive verb meaning “will be proclaimed.” As a passive verb, this indicates a condition which will attain while not focusing on the causal agent” (p. 39).

Furthermore, the precise connotation of Matt 24:14 is unclear. For instance,

“The construction of the phrase “as a testimony to all nations” (εἰς μαρτύριον πᾶσιν τοῖς ἔθνεσιν) contains a dative preposition (εἰς) which can be rendered “to” or “against.” While there is likely a dual sense to this idea of witnessing to and against the nations, it must be noted that Jesus’ promise does not here give any indication as to how the nations will receive the proclamation.

This proclamation to the whole inhabited world may be effective in winning the nations over, yet it could be seen to justify the condemnation of the guilty.” (p. 41)

Arguably, in Paul’s mind, the gospel had been preached to “all nations” (cf. Rom 10:18; Col 1:23) by the end of Paul’s ministry. Again, that claim depends on what Paul means when he says “all nations” (cf. Acts 19:10; see my previous post).

Promises are Not Commands

What’s the bottom line? Christ calls the church to “make disciples of all nations,” which entails both initial conversion (v. 19) and maturity as seen in obedience (v. 20). This is the church’s mission.

By contrast, Matt 24:14 is a promise, not a command merely to evangelize or make converts as a way of hastening Christ’s return. This is a common way of reading v. 14, but it ignores Matt 28:19-20. Specifically, it focuses only on the first part of the Great Commission.

This misreading of Matthew has consequences for mission strategy. The stress on speed undermines the call of the gospel and Christ’s explicit command. I can’t improve upon Bennett’s closing remarks. He says,

However, to the degree that world evangelization as a task draws the church’s attention away from the robust disciple-making process of the Great Commission, let the church reconfigure her methodologies to reflect the command with which she has been entrusted rather than the promises which are God’s to ensure. Likewise, if missions mottos serve to give the impression that the task of missions is less than making life-long disciple-makers, the mottos too must be discarded.

As has been shown, if Matt 24:14 is taken as the basis for missions strategy, one runs the risk of screening out the emphasis Jesus puts on discipleship, church planting, and teaching.

While world evangelism should certainly be part of the goal of missions strategies, the whole command of Matt 28:18–20 given to the church must be taken into account in assessment of appropriate tools, strategies, and methodologies. (pp. 47-48)

In the next post, I’ll offer a few thoughts and suggestions about how our observations about “all nations” might affect mission strategy.

Unreached people groups

Previous Post

October 16, 2019

“People Groups,” “Unreached,” and the Semantics of Missions Strategy

Next Post

October 28, 2019 I’ve taken on a new position with Mission ONE

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "My soul magnifies the Lord"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Elizabeth Deborah Hannah Mary

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »