Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Reviewing “The Lost World of the Israelite Conquest”

Reviewing “The Lost World of the Israelite Conquest”

Last updated on: January 18, 2018 at 8:10 am by Brad Vaughn

Reviewing “The Lost World of the Israelite Conquest” 2018-01-14T15:36:04-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

34129492.UY630_SR1200,630

Although John Walton never shies from controversial topics, his recent book is bold, even by his standards. In The Lost World of the Israelite Conquest (TLWIC), he takes up multiple contentious subjects yet without being cantankerous.

It is cowritten with his son, J. Harvey Walton, who was the lead writer. Nevertheless, this latest installment of The Lost World series matches the tone and methodology of his prior works, which I’ve previously reviewed here and formally.

**Why review this book?**

The title could mislead readers. I even wondered whether I would want to get it. He certainly addresses the conquest issue, but, along the way, he deals with various related and interconnected matters.

Why review books like this? Here are a few reasons.

Everything begins with interpretation. Few consistently and simply demonstrate sound methodology as does Walton.
The book raises several apologetic problems, such as God’s seeming “genocide” of the Canaanites.
Many themes and topics have a systemic influence on our theology. Slight adjustments can have a ripple effect on how we read other passages.
Walton does with culture in Old Testament interpretation what I suggest we do when doing contextualization.

The latter is significant for anyone who seeks to contextualize in a biblically faithful and culturally meaningful way.

Readjusting our Expectations

Walton divides TLWIC into 21 propositions. (In this series, I’ll blog only through certain key sections of the book.) The first three propositions lay the foundation for his interpretive and theological method.

Prop #1: Reading the Bible Consistently Means Reading It as an Ancient Document

Prop #2: We Should Approach the Problem of the Conquest by Adjusting Our Expectations About What the Bible Is

Prop #3: The Bible Does Not Define Goodness for Us or Tell Us How to Produce Goodness, but Instead Tells Us About the Goodness God Is Producing

The first proposition is fundamental to everything Walton writes. Accordingly,

“Central to our approach to how the conquest should be interpreted and understood is that the Bible, while it has relevance and significance for us, was not written to us” (p. 7).

Understanding that idea is one thing; letting it practically shape your reading and theology. photo-1456428199391-a3b1cb5e93ab_opt

Cultural Rivers

The chapter uses the metaphor of a river to describe the phenomenon whereby we either naturally “go with the culture” or “swim upstream against culture.” Going with or against is not the main point. The Waltons remind us that we do not even swim in the same “cultural river” as the biblical writers and their original audience.

The point is important for anyone concerned with recognizing how the Bible exerts authority within culture.

The Bible was not written in order to transform ancient thought to resemble modern thought, and neither was it written in order to simply affirm the values and ideas of the ancient cognitive environment and stamp them with divine authority for all time. (p. 9)

More specifically,

In order to translate properly, we have to understand the internal logic of the source, apply that logic to the text (as opposed to our own), and then rephrase the conclusion in terms that correspond to our logic. The conquest is a war, but if we want to understand the event, we cannot do so by using our modern understandings about war—what it is, what it is for, whether it is good or evil, how it should be waged, and so on. Instead, we have to look at the account in light of ancient understandings about war. (p. 10)

Beginning with “Why?”

Many others will be surprised to find they overlook a seemingly obvious point. We can hardly understand what the Bible says (i.e., means) until we grasp why it exists.

If we misconstrue its purpose, we will likely get much else wrong, if not in meaning, then in emphasis or focus. They write,

“We propose that the Bible is given to us not to provide a list of rules for behavior but to reveal God’s plans and purposes to us, which in turn will allow us to participate with him in those plans and purposes” (p. 15).

As shocking as this claim might sound, it makes sense, particularly when we keep in mind what they are not saying. The Waltons do not deny the Bible contains commands and that we can glean insight from it regarding how to live in God-honoring ways. photo-1457153661736-a8dcad28d896_opt

The authors remind us that expectations drive our search for the Bible’s meaning. Two approaches are typical.

(1) People see the Bible as a timeless rule book.

At best, this notion is a half-truth. “Timeless” might refer to the Bible’s authority but we ought not to mean the prescribed manner that all people –– spanning time and place–– should live.

(2) Other people assume the Bible describes the actions God uses to bring about “goodness” in the world.

This view is fraught with problems, the most significant being the presumption that we know what that “goodness” is. Most readers unquestionably presume such “goodness” is human happiness (cf. pp. 19–23). This was not the ideal of ancient near easterners. Order was.

What is “goodness”?

Furthermore, “The Bible does not tell us what God’s ideal of goodness is because the purpose for which the Bible was written does not require us to know that.” (p. 27).

We must consider the implications of a God-centered reading versus subtle human-centered readings. They add,

The Bible does not tell us what that final product is; the Bible tells us how to do our part on the assembly line [using a factory analogy]…. [It is possible] we will be able to contribute to the procedure, but we ourselves will still produce no goodness. This is because, once again, the Bible was not written to tell us how to produce goodness; it was written to tell us how to participate in the goodness that God is producing. (p. 27)

Finally, the Waltons foreshadow what will eventually follow from these statements.

The text does not affirm that killing the Canaanites is good, because killing the Canaanites is not the objective of the conquest. The objective of the conquest is to fulfill the covenant, which in turn is only a part in a larger process leading up to the new covenant, which in itself is only a part of the process leading up to the new creation.

The conquest account was not written in order to tell us what we should do; it was written to teach us about what the Israelite covenant is, which in turn is necessary for us to know what the new covenant is, which in turn is necessary for us to know what specifically we are supposed to do in our own cultural context to play our part in the new covenant. (p. 28)

But to grasp these conclusions, we will have to continue reading. More to come in upcoming posts.

What strikes you so far about the first few propositions? Do they raise any questions in your mind?

Theology

book review

John Walton

Previous Post

January 17, 2018

Recent Articles about Reputation and Shame in Chinese Culture

Next Post

January 24, 2018 What the Bible Does Not Say about the Canaanites

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

In Revelation, how many elders sit on thrones around God's throne?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Twenty-four Seven Seventy Twelve

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »