Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Four Reasons We Need Contextualization

Four Reasons We Need Contextualization

Last updated on: January 12, 2022 at 4:14 am by Brad Vaughn

Four Reasons We Need Contextualization 2022-01-12T04:14:26-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Credit: Flickr/Bart Everson

Hundreds of books and articles talk about contextualization. Nearly every one of them focuses on two questions: What is contextualization? How do we contextualize? Of course, those are important questions. There is a more fundamental question that too often gets overlooked––Why should we contextualize the gospel?

Why we contextualize determines how we contextualize. Perhaps, one reason people struggle with how to contextualize is that they don’t sufficiently grasp why to contextualize.

Contextualization Saves the Gospel

“Contextualization” shapes every aspect of the Christian life. It is more than a missionary strategy, a narrow evangelistic concern.

Contextualization refers to the process wherein people interpret, communicate, and apply the Bible within a particular cultural context.

“All theology is contextualized” has become a well-known dictum. Our question is not whether we contextualize the gospel; that’s inevitable. The real issue is whether we do it well.

Unless we intentionally contextualize the gospel, we might even lose the gospel. How so? If we are not careful, our message will neither be biblically faithful nor culturally meaningful. We will then be content with being relevant only to the theological tradition of our denominational or organizational subculture.

In One Gospel for All Nations, I try to develop a more holistic contextualization model. There are four fundamental reasons we need a new perspective regarding contextualization. Today, I answer the why question. In the next post, we’ll revisit the “how” question. If we lose sight of the purpose of contextualization, we will inevitably slide into pragmatism and theological partisanship.

1. All of Life

We contextualize the gospel in order to make disciples, not converts. Therefore, biblical contextualization seeks to transform people’s entire view of the world, not merely their religious affiliation and traditions. All too often, many have reduced contextualization to an evangelism strategy. Yet, the gospel announces that Jesus is king now and forever, not merely “in the next life.” To ensure someone is saved from future judgment, many people proclaim what they regard as the basic doctrines of the Christian faith.

Credit: Wikipedia

Some people think contextualization means finding a “redemptive analogy” that conveys a theological idea. Perhaps, this makes for an interesting first conversation, but it doesn’t get to the gospel’s underlying worldview.

Our gospel message does not necessarily touch upon the whole of people’s lives simply because we change some wording and imagery. It might still seem like we’re offering just another religious option otherwise disconnected from the concrete realities of life. If we have a superficial view of contextualization, our message will sound foreign and fragmented.

For some, contextualization is little more than a tool for efficient communication. However, efficient evangelism might not make faithful followers.

2. All of Scripture

Typically, people regard contextualization as something we do to the gospel. This is only a partial truth. After all, Scripture reveals a gospel that is already contextualized. (More on that point in my third post in this series). Nowadays, people equate contextualization only with communication and application. In other words, one does exegesis and theology, and then they contextualize the message.

This is a fundamentally problematic perspective. As I explain in Saving God’s Face, we miss that contextualization begins with interpretation. Yet, when we “assume the gospel,” we easily confuse the gospel with the particular emphases of our theological tradition.

Credit: Flickr/Tim Evanson

When we have a more robust view of contextualization, the entire biblical canon shapes our gospel perspective. One is freed to use the grand biblical Story when presenting the gospel, not merely passages from Romans and Galatians.

God inspired the entire Bible, not simply Paul’s letters. When we grasp this point, we are closer to understanding why Paul directly equates the Abrahamic covenant with “the gospel” (Gal 3:8).

3. All Nations

The gospel is for all nations. Sadly, too many people worldwide think the God in the Bible is a Western God. I have regularly spoken with these people. There are various reasons for this.

One reason is that people (like missionaries) typically share the gospel in a rather Western way. I don’t at all imply that “Western theology” is somehow “bad” or “false.” However, a traditional Western contextualization of the gospel is merely one way of presenting the gospel. This shouldn’t surprise us since even the biblical writers vary in how they express the gospel.

Therefore, we need to take contextualization seriously in order that all nations will know the one true God.

4. All Generations

Unfortunately, people too often judge churches by their size. Among many missionaries, a similar measure is used to judge one’s ministry––speed. In some circles, the worth of a ministry strategy or method primarily depends on whether it leads to rapid reproduction.

Credit: wikipedia

From this perspective, pragmatism wins out over genuine contextualization. One can simply observe what others have done, “reverse engineer” the process, and then expect God to bring about a rapid multiplication of churches. When churches plant churches, the result is sometimes called “generational growth.”

Pragmatism, however, can be shortsighted. It is hardly worthy of the name “generational growth” when churches are planted rapidly but few last ten years later.

Contextualization that is biblically faithful and culturally meaningful will invest in the long-term maturity, not merely short-term multiplication. We should judge contextualization methods not based on what is fast but rather on what will last.

Why We Need a New Perspective

By starting with why we should contextualize, the Bible reminds us of our true priorities.

Fundamentally, we want to make disciples who follow Christ and faithfully interpret Scripture for the sake of all nations until Jesus returns. I’ll explore an important, practical implication of what I’ve said above in the next post.

In your church or organization, how do people typically think about contextualization?

How have you answered the question, “Why should we contextualize?”

Contextualization

One Gospel for All Nations

Contextualization

Gospel

One Gospel for All Nations

Previous Post

March 29, 2016

Nick Peters' Review of "One Gospel for All Nations"

Next Post

April 6, 2016 The Gospel with an Accent (by Sam Chan)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who predicted the fall of Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Daniel Jesus Jeremiah Isaiah

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »