Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Proclaim God. Don't Prove Him.

Proclaim God. Don't Prove Him.

Last updated on: October 22, 2014 at 8:30 am by Brad Vaughn

Proclaim God. Don't Prove Him. 2014-10-22T08:30:57-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In the first post of this series, I suggested that many people might settle for a sub-biblical view of monotheism. My second post summarized the way that ancient Jews conceived of the one true God’s “divine identity.”

Now, I want to talk about application. In an upcoming post, I’ll suggest ideas for contextualizing the gospel for animists. Today, I will address apologetics or “pre-evangelism.”

What are they thinking?

Some traditional ways of thinking about the doctrine of God and apologetics may slightly misunderstand the actual questions people are asking.

1. Mistaken Objections

Some unbelievers simply have mistaken impressions. They assume they know the God whom we believe. However, their impression and the God we believe in are very different.

They reject a god we also don’t believe in.

Their impressions are wrong. Some listeners do not necessarily reject God Therefore, we need to clarify the true God is who.

Some traditional approaches to apologetics and systematic theology may not help us clarify this problem.

2. What kind of ‘god’?

Don’t assume that the number of gods (i.e. one, two, many) is most important question on a person’s mind. In keeping with the prior point, many people are more concerned with the kind of god we preach.

3. Theism may not be our listeners’ problem.

It’s possible that God’s “existence” is not the key objection of our listeners. Many people already believe in various sorts of quasi-divine beings, e.g. ancestors, spirits, demons, etc.

Within their worldview, these beings serve the same function as a “god.”

Proclaiming not Proving God

In view of the previous discussion about God’s “divine identity,” I suggest we spend more times proclaiming who God is rather than offering apologetic arguments to prove He exists.

I know many foreigners who will quickly accept this point; however, far fewer Chinese Christians agree in practice.

Why should we proclaim (not prove) the one true God?

For one thing, no one can “prove” God’s existence.

Only God reveals Himself. Our arguments are suggestive at best.

Clarification is better than refutation.

If someone objects to the Bible’s words, he or she first needs to understand its meaning. Many people’s objections often have no relationship to what the Bible actually says.

Therefore, if people want to debate the distinction between Christ’s divine and human nature, they should recognize that the Biblical authors do not struggle with the material (flesh) vs. immaterial (spirit) dichotomy in the same ways seen in Greek philosophy (and much of modern Christianity).

As John Walton puts it, the Bible was written for us, not to us.

Accordingly, we can’t assume the Bible answers our questions. The Bible frequently doesn’t consider our particular philosophical or social questions. We need to be careful about using the Bible to answer questions it never actually asks.

In short, people should not oppose what the biblical writers never say.

One should first seek to understand then evaluate biblical claims. If we assume divinity mostly concerns “substance” (what deity is), then the thing we want to talk about departs from what the Bible wants to focus on.

We want non-believers to assess the biblical writers’ claims according to what they are actually saying (rather than the questions we bring to the text).

For example, consider this fact: The Biblical writers spend far more time trying to disprove that some “god” exists than they do “proving” that the one true God exists. No wonder some people in the Roman Empire accused the early Christians of being atheists!!

This is extraordinarily ironic. Nowadays, apologists and missionaries try using the Bible to prove God’s existence when that was never the agenda of the writers themselves! We often use the Bible’s negative argument to prove a positive point. Strange!

Advantages

In the first post, I listed a number of problems with typical apologetic arguments concerning God’s existence. In addition to addressing those issues, the approach I recommend has another advantages.

1. It opens people to consider revelation, not merely logical proofs.

Traditional apologetic proofs normally only use logic, not revelation.

2. It does not create new apologetic questions.

Some people do not doubt some kind of spiritual being’s existence; however, if we start to argue atheism versus theism, then we may cause unbelievers to regress in their thinking. Since we are the ones raising the question, they perhaps will start to doubt God’s existence.

In the coming post, I’ll offer a few suggestions about how biblical monotheism should shape the way we speak with non-Christians.

Photo Credit: geralt via pixabay

Previous Post

October 15, 2014

“Who” is the One True God?

Next Post

October 29, 2014 Talking about Biblical Monotheism -- A Few Suggestions

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who interpreted Peter's vision about clean and unclean animals?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul Barnabas God Philip

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »