Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Sin is personal because it is social

Sin is personal because it is social

Last updated on: July 30, 2014 at 8:35 am by Brad Vaughn

Sin is personal because it is social 2014-07-30T08:35:47-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

When sharing the gospel story and/or talking about sin, I suggest we start with the group, not the individual. In other words, we should discuss sin as a collective-group problem rather than explaining sin primarily as an individual problem.

I know some people might get worried at this point, thinking I am doing a theological “slight of hand” whereby I insert liberal theology and alleviate individuals. Not at all.

Here are 2 reasons.

When you have the group, you have the individual; if you have the individual, you don’t necessarily have the group.

Individuals live in and get identity from their community. Moral decisions are made in relation to others.

In short, all sin is inherently social. More on this point below.

“Adam” is a Collective Noun

It’s been long observed that the Hebrew word for Adam/humanity in Gen 1–2 is a collective noun. It is more likely that the “man” (Adam) intends to highlight the whole of humanity; after all, in Gen 1:26–27, the “man”/”Adam” (same original word) is made in God’s image, male and female.

By seeing how Paul uses “Adam,” we better grasp the point that Adam represents far more than one individual.

Adam represents fallen humanity enslaved to sin and death. Christ represents the new humanity, now made slaves to righteousness. Thus, when speaking of “Adam” (e.g. Rom 5; 1 Cor 15), the emphasis is collective, not individual. What we in fact see is the disintegration of the collective, the fragmentation of unity to many broken parts. Then image of God is shattered with the division of the nations.

At first, the Adam story seems mainly to be about an individual; in fact, it’s about a group, i.e. the human family!

“Adam”, collectively, is intended become God’s kingdom of priests. This is not only apparent in the kingdom/Temple imagery of Gen 1-2, we see God’s objective clarified in Israel (Exodus 19:6) and fulfilled in the Church (1 Peter 2:8-10).

If anything, the Adam story pushes us to start with the collective/social, not the individual.

In the next post, I’ll suggest a specific way to do so. For now, I want to explain a few advantages with starting with the group rather than the individual.

Why Start with Groups: Five Advantages

1. Social Nature of Sin

As a stated above, sin is inherently communal.

Sin distorts our view of others, dulls our desires to love people, and divides social groups. There is no such thing as a truly “private” sin. There is always a cost to one’s community, even if it is subtle and incalculable.

Thus, when talking both about sin and the gospel, starting with the group helps people keep a proper perspective on the nature of sin and salvation.

2. The Experience of Sin

People experience sin with their various social groups. Therefore, people can more easily identify the causes and effects of sin. We could mention the pains of divorce, the civil war and ethnic strife that rips apart families, clans, and nations.

As a result, one better grasps the need for a solution that goes well beyond personal sentiment and the so-called “private” sphere.

3. Willingness to Confess Sin

Many times, one is more willing to name and confess sin when explained in a social context. By seeing certain problems in society, a family, or an organization, one can understand the reality and seriousness of our own sin.

Truthfully, we cannot always speak with clarity over specific sins (due to the ambiguity of certain circumstances). However, when we see the pattern of sin in social groups, we can more easily admit that we’ve also done that sort of thing, even if the details are different.

In other words, we can easily dismiss specific sins, but we have a much harder time doing so when mindful of the moral struggles that plague those around us, indeed all humanity.

4. Defensiveness

Of course, all people hate looking bad in front of others. Yet, this doesn’t explain every instance where someone is “defensive” about confessing sin. All too often, people feel they are being spotlighted as somehow “unique” in their problem. A person can feel isolated, as if a special case, when he or she is accused of being a “sinner.”

Everyone knows there is something wrong with the world; everyone also knows they have contributed to it in at least some small way. (Even the most proud will admit imperfection, but will simply say they have comparatively less wrong with them.)

Therefore, when we point out the problem that plagues the entire world, we include our listeners without isolating them as somehow more “evil” than the next person.

5. Balanced

Finally, we can more easily find balance when we note an often overlooked fact. The Bible presents the relationship between sin and people in two ways:

We all are perpetrators as well as* victims*.**

Stereotypically speaking, “liberals” emphasize the former; “conservatives” make much of the latter. The Bible speaks of humanity in terms of both. Not only are we rebels; we are slaves to sin who need to be set free by Christ.

Social systems perpetuate countless evils. For example, laws used to allow slavery. Sin is not only personal; it is pervasive in its influence.

The gospel both provokes conviction and draws with compassion.

Photo Credit: geralt via pixabay

Evangelism

Gospel

Adam

Previous Post

July 23, 2014

Why does Adam's fruit fixation send me to hell?

Next Post

August 1, 2014 Six Places Honor and Shame Hide in the Bible

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What natural disaster did God use to destroy the earth in Noah’s time?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Fire Famine Flood Earthquake

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »