Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

jacksonwu

Taking the Context out of the Bible?

Last updated on: April 9, 2013 at 8:41 am   by Brad Vaughn

Taking the Context out of the Bible? 2013-04-09T08:41:14-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Taking the Context out of the Bible?

We’ve all heard taking a passage out of context, where someone interprets a text in a way that completely doesn’t fit with the author’s original context. Among oral-based and illiterate cultures, I wonder if the mirror reflection of this problem exists––stripping the context from the biblical story. I’m asking this question:

293693669_59574a7640Might it be the case that some methods of oral Bible teaching may make it more difficult, even impossible, for oral peoples to accurately interpret Scripture?

The first rule of biblical interpretation is “Context is King.”

In short, this principle states that context the meaning of a word or passage is determined by its context.  This creates a dilemma for people who can’t read. How can they interpret a passage by reviewing its context, contained within the written biblical text?

The problem is exacerbated by the methods people often use to teach the Bible among oral peoples. Some approaches are unavoidable; yet, problems creep in. Obviously memorization is a must. On the other hand, the selection of stories to be taught can at times be arbitrary, more reflected of the missionary’s theological tradition and personal preference rather than the main emphasis of the Bible itself.

In the process, metaphors can be mixed together without a sense of coherency. Some parts of the story (especially those related to Israel) can left out, creating major gaps of understanding in the minds of the listeners. Themes and motifs appear and disappear, seemingly strung together by some unspoken theological system.

One common way of teaching biblical stories is to teach them in the sequence they happen in Scripture. Depending on how many stories are told, listeners wait a while for grasping the big picture. Furthermore, by virtue of sequence, listeners will know the first parts of Genesis especially well, simply due to learning them early and with repetition.

What about C2C?

Think about a tool like C2C (Creation-to-Christ). C2C in itself improves upon of a number of other methods, but it suffers from of a few of the things I’ve mentioned.

For example, too much attention is given to the very speculative question about how Satan and the demons fell. The Bible gives so few explicit texts to reconstruct such a theology. Angelology and demonology have a prominent place within C2C, not because the Bible requires it but because of theological tradition and the decision of strategists.

Also, disproportionate emphasis is given to the recounting the Garden and the Fall. This is not striking until one notices how little Gen 3 is used in evangelistic presentations in the Bible. In fact, the only two places Adam is given much attention in the New Testament is in Romans 5 and 1 Corinthians 15, where he appears mainly to accent who Christ is.

More could be said about other themes. For example, the resurrection is barely mentioned, although it is the central even in the apostle’s gospel preaching. Further, while the sacrificial system is a central piece to C2C’s story, what about God’s covenants to Abraham, Moses, David, not to mention the New Covenant? This concept shapes the biblical narrative in a way that far surpasses that of “sacrifice “by itself.

The truth is that C2C is shaped more by systematic theology than biblical theology.

To put it differently, the major points of C2C’s story are not the most prominent points of the biblical story as a whole. This doesn’t make C2C necessarily “untrue” or “bad,” however, it does make it extraordinarily difficult for oral peoples to interpret the Bible for themselves with a view of the Bible’s grand narrative. From the very beginning, major and minor points are not distinguished. Clear and unclear doctrines are intermingled.

Sadly, Christians from oral peoples who first learn C2C (or others like it) will have many good truths in hand, but with little to build on. In them, context is not king because the story they hear is filtered too much by systematic theologies, which may well be true but do not give proper balance to the whole story.

In the upcoming blogs, I’ll suggest a few ways we can lay a better foundation for oral peoples, one that equips them to eventually interpret Scripture in view of entire biblical canon.

Click here for Part One of the Series


Photo Credit: CC 2.0/eyesright.speedofcreativity.org

Interpretation/Exegesis

Mission Methods

Theological Contextualization

Theology

Contextualization Among Oral Peoples

Orality

Unreached People Groups UPG

Previous Post



April 4, 2013

Contextualization Among Oral Peoples -- Part 1 of a New Series

Next Post



April 11, 2013 Critiquing Creation to Christ (C2C)


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the name for a church led by a bishop in the Catholic, Anglican, and Orthodox traditions?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Tabernacle Synagogue Cathedral Chapel

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »

Related posts from Saving God's Face

Family

Bear One Another’s Burdens, But Carry Your Own...

Saving God’s Face

Family

When Love Sounds Like a Roar

Saving God’s Face

Family

Should We Emphasize Jesus as King to People...

Saving God’s Face

Family

Why Egalitarians Can Stay in a Complementarian Church

Saving God’s Face

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Donald Trump's Heaven? No Room For God

Donald Trump’s heaven would be filled with grudges, backbiting, refusal both to...

Peruvian airplane ready for Pope Leo XIV

The Chilean airline LATAM which serves as the main domestic flight provider...

Bear One Another’s Burdens, But Carry Your Own...

At first glance, Paul seems to contradict himself within the span of...

A Catholic Century or an Evangelical Century?

Will the form of Christianity that prevails in the years ahead be...

Crying in the Kitchen: When My Body Finally...

It was still dark when I found myself dancing in the kitchen...

'I Play Rocky': A Two-Fisted Tale of Hope...

Amazon MGM's 'I Play Rocky' recreates the making of the 1976 blockbuster...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube