Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Are Missionaries Ashamed of the Language of Paul's Gospel?

Are Missionaries Ashamed of the Language of Paul's Gospel?

Last updated on: September 2, 2016 at 2:13 pm by Brad Vaughn

Are Missionaries Ashamed of the Language of Paul's Gospel? 2016-09-02T14:13:45-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I teach Romans in Chinese. It’s painful sometimes. Don’t misunderstand me. I love Romans. Much of my PhD research focused on this book. Why then can it be hard to teach?

The most prominent translation in China, the HeHeBen (和合本), literally deletes an overwhelmingly large number of the logical words Paul put in the original text. People are sensitive to interpretations and translations that add to the original text; however, I have heard little to no complaints by people about what the Chinese Bible takes out of the original text.

There’s a problem because….

Imagine what it would be like to read a rigorously argued letter like Romans without having those little words like “because,” “for,” and “therefore.”

For the sake of illustration, I calculated problematic verses in chapters 1–11 of Romans. Below are verses that do not translate the Greek words for “because” or “for,” such as διοτι, γαρ.

Romans 1:19, 20, 26; 2:12, 13, 14, 24, 25; 3:20*, 22, 28*; 4:2, 3, 14; 5:7, 13; 6:5, 10, 14, 19, 21; 7:7, 15, 18; 8:6, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 24, 26; 9:3, 11, 19; 10:2, 4, 5, 11, 12; 11:15, 21, 25, 34. (*translated as “therefore”)

These verses actually translate “for/because” with the opposite meaning “therefore”:

Rom 3:20, 28

These verses translate “for/because” with 原来 or 原, which in modern China does not mean “because” and instead means “originally” or “it turns out.”

Rom 1:18, 2:13, 5:16; 8:7; 11:21

The following verses do not translate at all the Greek words for “then” and “therefore,” like (διο, ουν,αρα).

Rom 2:1, 21; 5:1, 9, 12 (δια τουτο); 6:21; 8:1

(To download a document with this information in Mandarin, click here.)

Let me give some background. Everyone who has lived in China and learned the language knows that Chinese speakers are not like those who used biblical Greek. Logical words do indeed exist. The problem is not Mandarin itself. Of course, responsibility first rests on the original translators.

However, contemporary Christian leaders do contribute to the problem when they do nothing to counteract the problem in their teaching. As an example, think about the typical training a missionary from the United States receives from a seminary. Of course, I don’t have statistics but I think it’s quite safe to say that most missionaries don’t have a seminary degree, like an MDiv. If they have attended seminary, they almost certainly did not study Greek and Hebrew as would a student in the fields of New Testament, Old Testament, and theology. In addition, how many missionaries are proficient in theological Chinese? I don’t need to belabor this point. Not many at all.

Therefore….?

What happens then when a typical missionary attempts to teach the Bible, particularly a book like Romans? He or she neither knows the biblical languages nor has a firm grasp of the local language when it comes to Scripture. How is s/he to identify ambiguities or mistranslations? Not only this, how could missionaries ever hope to teach the national believer to interpret Scripture?

Although the local pastor may not know Greek and Hebrew, one would at least expect the local translation of the Bible to include critical words like “because” and “therefore.” This is not asking too much. These are neither “heady” nor “technical” words. Inevitably, what will end up happening? The average Western missionary, who thinks himself pretty familiar with Romans, could assume too much and simply assert interpretations without proof. After all, how well can we defend interpretations of certain passages when we can’t see the flow and connections between verses in key passages?

Consider the dense arguments in the following sections, which omit logical words:

2:1, 12, 13, 14, 21, 24, 25

3:20, 22, 28

8:1, 6, 7, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 24, 26

10:2, 4, 5, 11, 12

The most significant debate among New Testament and theology scholars over the past 30 years has been over the “New Perspective on Paul,” which focuses a lot on Romans. How could a Chinese pastor ever hope to keep up with this discussion?

More to the heart of things, how can we ever hope for Chinese church leaders to self-theologize when those who train them have not trained themselves in critical matters of theology and language, whether the biblical languages or the local language?

Previous Post

March 4, 2013

The Virtue of Education in the East and West

Next Post

March 7, 2013 Reproducibility: Idol or Necessity in Modern Missions?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What island was John on when he wrote Revelation?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Crete Patmos Cyprus Malta

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »