A Review of "The Father's Love" (an evangelistic booklet)

Last updated on: December 10, 2012 at 9:16 am by Brad Vaughn

A Review of "The Father's Love" (an evangelistic booklet) 2012-12-10T09:16:27-07:00 Brad Vaughn

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I previously wrote a post announcing that Werner Mischke, Executive Vice President and Director of Training Ministries at Mission ONE, has designed a new evangelistic booklet that uses an honor and shame perspective. It’s called The Father’s Love Booklet. Today, I review it.

Overall, I like it. I should first give full disclosure. I’m not a fan of things like tracts but acknowledge that they can be useful tools, if they are used wisely and do not replace a more thorough explanation of the gospel. As a starting point, however, they can be helpful. I have long been developing a few potential booklets of my own. To be sure, this is not a “tract” in the typical sense. It’s longer and more expensive than an average tract.

The booklet uses Luke 15:11–32, the story of the Prodigal Son, to introduce people to God’s own love for people. The aim of the booklet is to use the language of honor and shame to communicate the message of salvation. On the booklet’s website, Werner gives 10 reasons why he developed the booklet, including the fact that honor-shame is a common feature in the majority world and there is resistance to a “Western” gospel. On his own website, you can see how he distinguished a guilt and shame orientation.

Here are a few other quick miscellaneous comments. The booklet has 20 pages and uses the Easy-to-Read Version of the Bible (ERV). There are plans to create a digital version and translate it into other languages, beginning with Arabic and Spanish.

What do I like about it?

The booklet largely takes a narrative approach rather than simply listing a few principles or doctrines to be believed. Along the way, it poses various questions to spur reflection and conversation between believers and non-believers. the questions also help readers anticipate what comes next. The booklet is easy to read. The illustrations are simple and the characters don’t appear to look very Caucasian, like so many other evangelistic resources.

The reader is forced to think about the Father’s honor, not simply the gross behavior of the sons. The booklet helpfully connects God’s love with honor and shame. God expresses his love by enduring the shame brought about by his sons; furthermore, he even seeks to share his own honor with us. In its explanatory section, the booklet primarily uses the book of John (not just Romans). This is refreshing. A few other good points are mentioned but not developed. On p. 17, it says, “He suffers to cover our shame and give us His honor,” therefore, “Jesus defeated sin, shame, death” (p. 18). The last page quotes Phil 2:9–11, reminding us that everyone will ultimately bow down in honor of Jesus, to the glory of God.

Finally, I like the perspective on faith expressed in the wording: “And when we believe in Jesus, following Him day by day, we can truly live in victory over sin and shame!” Faith is depicted here as active, necessarily expressing itself in action (not perfection). Just think of the book of James. I would add that faith should convey the sense of loyalty, which then is expressed in obedience. Loyalty and obedience are not equivalent but they are necessarily connected. The “loyalty” theme is especially important to honor-shame contexts.

For those familiar with related debates, the booklet presents a “soterian” gospel. In other words, it frames the gospel in terms of salvation, how a person gets saved. There is nothing in the booklet that talks about Jesus as king or the fulfillment of Israel’s history. Instead, it aims at a particular entry point for conversation.

What aspects of the booklet might some people regard as weaknesses or possible areas for improvement?

I personally would have preferred a clearer explanation of the meaning of “sin.” There are times when the booklet talks about “sin and shame” but readers may not know how those relate. To be fair, one could infer from the narrative that “sin” refers to the shame brought to the father by the sons. Shame of course can refer to different things in this situation. I’ve written on this before. I suggest, at a basic level, sin could be understood as shaming or dishonoring God. I know the booklet presumes this; yet, it would be nice to see it laid out more explicitly. Sin is shameful behavior that also brings shame on the sinner. The booklet “slips” into traditional language at one point, asking how it can be that God would “suffer to cover our sin and shame and give us His righteousness and honor?” The term “righteousness” is suddenly added without explanation.

Although the booklet includes a chart that nicely contrasts the younger and older sons, I don’t prefer the category labels: “rebellious sinner” versus the “religious sinner.” There’s nothing inherently wrong with them. I would simply like it to see another word than “religious” to describe the older son. I acknowledge that the older brother represents the “religious” leaders that opposed Jesus. However, one may not want to press the distinction between “religious” and “social” when talking about a context like ancient Palestine. The Pharisees were staunch cultural conformists. Maybe the older brother could represent ethnocentrism or someone like a “nationalists.” I admit this is an anachronistic term. From a cross-cultural standpoint, “religious” need not have a negative connotation. How people view the word “religion” will vary across Muslim or East Asian contexts. With some thought, I’m sure something more in keeping with the honor-shame theme could be used.

Finally, the presentation includes “sinner’s prayer.” In short, if you don’t like the use of such prayers, then you won’t like it here. If you are alright with using a “sinner’s prayer,” then you should be fine with this one. I’m not a fan. I think, in Scripture, baptism is supposed to function more in the way people today treat such prayers. However, that’s for another discussion. The inclusion of a “sinner’s prayer” certainly does not negate the booklet’s value.

In summary, I like the booklet. What I consider slight weaknesses certainly reflects my own preference. I imagine many or most people will disagree with me on points. Positively, it goes further than perhaps any other honor-shame booklet/tract I’ve read. It is consistent with how honor-shame works. The presentation is no mere ploy where it exchanges a few honor-shame words and then presumes to actually being contextual. I would use it as a conversation starter. Like all such tools, people need to hear from a live person who can help make sure they truly understand the gospel, its implications and cost.

Previous Post

December 9, 2012

We will not see the face of God without losing our own

Next Post

December 11, 2012 Sharing Our Story Is Not Enough to Produce Faith

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Atonement Biblical Theology Book Reviews China Chinese Church Chinese Culture Chinese Language Collectivism Contextualization Culture (General) Ecclesiology Evangelism Gospel Honor & Shame (Face) Interpretation/Exegesis Justification/Righteousness Missiology Mission Methods One Gospel for All Nations Other Practical Contextualization Reading Romans with Eastern Eyes Resources Romans Salvation (General) Saving God's Face Seeking God's Face The Cross in Context Theological Contextualization Theological Education Theology Uncategorized

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: James says that if anyone is a hearer of the word and not a doer, he is blessed in what he does.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE

Books by This Author Books by Brad Vaughn

See All Titles »