Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Irreverin

Home
Progressive Christian
Faith, Fire and Fury: Trump, Jeffress, and the Dangerous Theology of Kings

Faith, Fire and Fury: Trump, Jeffress, and the Dangerous Theology of Kings

Last updated on: August 9, 2017 at 9:01 am by Erin Wathen

Faith, Fire and Fury: Trump, Jeffress, and the Dangerous Theology of Kings 2017-08-09T09:01:38-07:00 Erin Wathen

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Guest Post: Rev. Brandon Gilvin

I have a love-hate relationship with journalism that covers religion. On the one hand, I love a good feature story about a monastery in the middle of rural America, or a story about religious traditions working together in innovative ways, or an insightful profile about someone who has examined her own faith enough to speak about it without resorting to platitudes. But then, there are the stories that just make me cringe.

Tonight, when I sat down to look over some of the daily headlines, I caught a story that began with a cringe-worthy line: “Texas megachurch Pastor Robert Jeffress, one of President Trump’s evangelical advisers who preached the morning of his inauguration, has released a statement saying the president has the moral authority to take out North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.”

Of course, this was following President Trump’s statement today that North Korea would be met with “Fire and Fury unlike the world has ever seen” should they continue to threaten the United States.

explosion-123690_640

And of course, Jeffress cites Paul’s letter the Romans, Chapter 12 as carte blanche permission for the use of “ Fire and Fury” by the United States. It’s not uncommon for interpreters to use this as a justification for the expansion of military power (although ask those same people how they feel about other federal programs and if Romans mandates them, too), but that does not mean that it’s the only—or even the most responsible or accurate–exegetical conclusion to draw. We’re talking about a letter written to line out a survival strategy for a minority faith in the cosmopolitain capital of a first century super power. Paul was counseling some early Jesus-followers on how to deal with Ceasar’s golf club saber-rattling, not counseling them on how to endorse it.

In Christian Moral and Ethical traditions, there is more than one path when it comes to the consideration of violence and warfare. Pacifism is certainly one route, but so is Just War theory, which outlines criteria for when it is moral to go to war. People of faith from across the generations have struggled with how to live out their commitment to their countries and their covenant to love God and love neighbor. I get that–I’ve read sermons in support of the war against communism and I’ve seen liberation theology-flavored illustrations of Jesus dressed up like a Sandinista, all considering themselves orthodox Christianity. I get that we are all heavily influenced by our social locations, other commitments and values, and that we’re never just ONE ideological thing. I try to be as generous as I can when it comes to a difference of opinion. I get that people of faith and good will can read the same bits of scripture and come to equally justifiable but different conclusions.

But the level of irresponsibility it takes to say something like what Jeffress is suggesting? No matter your politics or who you voted for, this is garbage–theologically, diplomatically, politically. It is reckless. It is stupid.

It speaks to the anti-intellectual, uncritical way in which some traditions teach the Biblical corpus. It speaks to a rejection of the enlightenment, a sort of implicit nostalgia for the divine right of kings, and it makes doing effective ministry harder.

But perhaps most problematic to me is the fact that it conflates one’s own national self-interest with a theological critique of evil. It’s hard to deny that North Korea poses a threat (or would, at least, like to pose a thread–of what magnitude its actual geopolitical impact could be is debatable) to the United States, and yes, I have personal, familial, cultural, and political interest wrapped up in that threat. But It’s also important to remember that “Fire and Fury” is not without collateral damage, and that—as the same moral traditions that produced Just War Theory would remind us all—there’s a price that we pay when we stop seeing others as Imago Dei and only as actors for a state that we call evil. We can quickly become participants in the same evil we claim to oppose (and doesn’t the first chapter of Romans have something to say about how all of us are complicit in how messed up the world can be—not just North Korea?)

Jeffress isn’t offering orthodoxy, despite his vain declarations. It’s not Faith to go along with Fire and Fury. All he has to offer is a sick mix of hate and hubris.

And I’ve read that story before. It never ends well.

Rev. Brandon Gilvin is the Senior Pastor of First Christian Church, Chattanooga, TN. He has passions for community building, social justice work, and the intersection of culture and faith, as well as a love for reading, writing, live music, and the outdoors. Check out his blog, The Long Road Home.

progressive christianity

Previous Post

August 2, 2017

Grieving Grace

Next Post

August 12, 2017 Show Us Your Faces

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category a good week for progress Advent and Christmas Being a Person desert life faith and community Good News for Progressives Lent and Easter Marriage and Family S*^! Jesus Says sabbatical road tripping Spirituality in Culture Talking to Strangers the "Best Stuff I Ever Ate" diet travel Uncategorized writing Writing Prompt Wednesday

Select a Month January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 February 2011 July 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian group is known for following a strict dress code and pacifism?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Amish Baptists Pentecostals Lutherans