Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Interspirituality for the Modern Day Seeker

Being ‘Not Religious’ Throws the Baby Out With the Bathwater

Last updated on: November 6, 2022 at 12:49 am   by Gudjon Bergmann

Being ‘Not Religious’ Throws the Baby Out With the Bathwater 2022-11-06T00:49:30+00:00 Gudjon Bergmann

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I was proudly ‘spiritual but not religious’ for over twenty years. I’ve only recently dropped the ‘not religious’ label. Here’s why.

‘Not that Religious’

Even before I got acquainted with the New Age movement, I’d begun to call myself ‘not that religious.’ For context, I was raised in a culturally Christian environment in Iceland. We celebrated all the Christian holidays and attended church at christenings, confirmations, weddings and funerals. Before my confirmation, I even studied the New Testament weekly for a year and knew several prayers and psalms by heart. Still, as a family, we didn’t go to church or seek guidance from priests. As I said, ‘not that religious.’

Religion Became the ‘Old Paradigm’

My parents introduced me to the New Age in the early 90s. It was eye-opening. People were free to explore a variety of beliefs and traditions. Some of them I agreed with. Some not. That didn’t matter. Everyone was free to explore.

In that environment, religion became ‘the old paradigm,’ i.e., the old way of thinking. Because most of us had Christian or culturally Christian backgrounds, there was a concerted pushback against Christianity within the New Age movement in Iceland.

In hindsight, that makes sense. Anyone wanting to get out of a relationship knows that a period of dislike is needed to create separation before a new type of friendship can be established (if that ever happens). We pushed back pretty hard.

The Dreaded ‘Patriarchy’

The church in Iceland didn’t do much to deserve the pushback. There weren’t any pedophile problems, mistreatments, or ex-communications. It had just become a stuffy institution devoid of living spirituality. Still, to distance ourselves from the church, we made them look worse.

Later in the 90s, the idea of ‘the patriarchy’ became more prominent within academia, and it spread like wildfire in New Age circles because it seemed to confirm all our misgivings. We were right. Religion was just a collection of old white men intent on dominating the rest of us.

I Had No Problem With Being Not Religious, Until…

I fully embraced the ‘spiritual but not religious’ label within this context. For over twenty years, that’s what I proudly called myself when anyone asked. Granted, the religious landscape in Iceland was relatively flat. It was either the Lutheran government-run church, fringe Christian groups, or the ‘not religious’ label.

During this time, I became enamored with American spiritual teachers who labeled themselves in the same way. They appeared to present their ideas with such freedom of thought, such poetry.

Naturally, when I moved to the USA from Iceland in 2010, I thought I would find a mix of seekers that I could resonate with, people who proudly stood outside of religion and were against it even. What I found was much more complex.

The Complex Landscape of American Religion

We settled in Austin, Texas. I know, I know. That’s not exactly ‘liberal, not religious’ America. But it did teach me a lot.

At first, my ‘not religious’ sentiments grew stronger. Everyone seemed to belong to a church, which we just “had to visit.” And the blending of politics and religion was well beyond anything I had ever experienced. Prayers at the beginning of town hall meetings, a cop openly praying at Popeye’s before gobbling down his chicken, a group of people creating a prayer circle outside of an HOA meeting to pray for a good result in the board elections. These were just a few sights that appeared totally foreign to me.

What Changed?

It took a few years, but my attitude softened once I got to know people and saw how the church fit into their daily lives. I realized that to them, ‘church’ wasn’t a stuffy institution but rather an attempt at community building where people sought everything from friends and business partners to financial and emotional support when life became hard. And, for the record, life here was much harder than in Iceland.

Still, it wasn’t until I studied to become an Interfaith Minister in 2016-2017 that I began seriously thinking about dropping the ‘not religious’ label. Being exposed to a variety of wisdom traditions, attending services, meeting people from various backgrounds, and, most importantly, redefining what the term ‘religion’ meant caused me to reevaluate many things, my chosen theological label being one of them.

What is Religion?

If ‘spirituality’ is defined as a personal journey, how does it relate to ‘religion,’ and how do we define it? Well, both Huston Smith and William James posited that religions arise from personal spiritual experiences but then grow into something bigger. Communities arise. Rituals become codified. Teachings are preserved both verbally and in writing. Institutions are created.

This means that the term ‘religion’ can mean many things to many people.

What I’ve found in my peer group is that most people are more ‘anti-institutional’ than ‘anti-communities of caring.’ Religion, then, can be both something concrete and something that is interpreted based on the predominant worldview of the interpreter.

A Vehicle for Preservation

All the reasons stated above contributed, but I primarily stopped calling myself ‘not religious’ because I realized that religions are vehicles for preserving spiritual truths.

You see, when I started digging into original spiritual texts, I noticed that the ‘freethinking’ and ‘original’ spiritual teachers from America, which I had followed and adored from the late 90s into the early 00s, had borrowed extensively from the wisdom traditions. Their ideas weren’t new. They were variations on a theme.

In musical terms, it’s like realizing that most of the songs we listen to today are variations on the works of Mozart, Beethoven, Rachmaninov, Vivaldi, and Chopin (who knows, maybe they are).

Hurts More Than It Helps

Does religion still have an image problem? Absolutely. But I’ve found that denouncing it hurts more than it helps. It’s like a leaf hacking at the roots of the tree on which it is blooming.

Being able to look at original texts, visit places of worship through interfaith efforts, such as the iACT passport program in Austin, and compare ideas from one religion with another is crucial to my interspiritual efforts.

That is why I no longer call myself spiritual but not religious.

I am just spiritual in my own way.

Gudjon Bergmann
Author and Mindfulness Teacher
Amazon Author Profile

Recommended books:

Picture: CC0 License

 

Spiritual Practice

Spirituality

not religious

spiritual but not religious

Previous Post



July 19, 2022

Integral Changed Everything: How Studying Ken Wilber's Integral Theory Changed My Life

Next Post



July 25, 2022 Spiritually Interdependent


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Beliefs and Values Change Compassion Contemplation Creating Moments of Peace Cultural Division Culture Wars Current Events Environmental Protection Experifaith Forgiveness Global Warming Golden Rule Gratitude Gun Debate Gun Safety Integral Theory Interfaith Interfaith Dialogue Interfaith Quotes Interspirituality Islam Language Meditation Mindfulness Morality mysticism Nonduality Parenthood Pluralism Poetry Prayer Quotes Religion Religion and Politics Science and Religion Self-Care Social Harmony Spiritual Practice Spirituality Stress Uncategorized Yoga

Select a Month September 2023 August 2023 June 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Nehemiah rebuilt the walls of Jerusalem in 52 days.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE

Related posts from Interspirituality for the Modern Day Seeker

New Visions

Practical Spirituality: Key Questions

Interspirituality for the Modern Day Seeker

New Visions

Conscious Spiritual Homeostasis

Interspirituality for the Modern Day Seeker

New Visions

Can Nonduality Be Life-Affirming?

Interspirituality for the Modern Day Seeker

New Visions

The Easiest Way to Give Meaning to Emotional...

Interspirituality for the Modern Day Seeker

TRENDING AT PATHEOS New Visions

Did Prayer Cure His Cancer? Or Was It...

At 4 AM one morning, Joshua W. Brown’s wife awoke to a...

8 Ways a Near-Death Experience Rewires the Soul

Does Consciousness Survive Physical Death? After 50 Years of Research, Dr. Raymond...

Holy Longing: What Our Restlessness Is Telling Us

“One can find so many pains when the rain is falling.” -John...

The Making of a Dumbass

  What this is NOT about.  This blog is definitely not about...

Who Told You That?

Who said the Israelites were God’s chosen? That’s right, they did. Who...

The Spirit World Is the Real World: God...

A Monk’s Wisdom on Body and Spirit I sit with Brother Martin...

view all New Visions blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube