Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Nonreligious
Careers, Workplace and Religion
The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust

Last updated on: October 16, 2026 at 4:55 pm by Gleb Tsipursky

0 Comments

The Real AI Story Is Adoption Without Trust 2026-10-16T16:55:52-04:00 Gleb Tsipursky

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Real AI Story

Artificial intelligence has crossed a political threshold. It is no longer a futuristic marvel or a niche productivity tool. It is becoming an ordinary part of American life, and that is exactly why the mood is darkening. A new Quinnipiac University poll captures the paradox with unusual clarity: Americans are using AI more often, yet trusting it less, fearing it more, and demanding more oversight.

That split matters because adoption alone never settles legitimacy. Quinnipiac found that 51% of Americans now use AI to research topics they are curious about, up from 37% a year earlier, while 27% use it for school or work projects and 27% for data analysis. But 76% say AI-generated information can be trusted only some of the time or hardly ever, and 55% now think AI will do more harm than good in their day-to-day lives. The technology is spreading faster than public confidence can keep up.

Adoption Without Trust

The most important fact in the poll is not that Americans are worried. It is that they are worried while still using the tools. That is a much more consequential kind of skepticism. It means the country is not staging a rejection of AI. It is building a conditional relationship with it.

That broader pattern shows up beyond Quinnipiac. A Pew Research Center survey on AI in society found Americans far more concerned than excited about AI’s growing role in daily life, while another Pew report on personal control found most people feel they have little control over whether AI is used in their lives and want more say over that exposure. In other words, the public does not object to intelligence in machines nearly as much as it objects to powerlessness in humans.

That is why the public’s views are more nuanced than the usual hype-versus-doom debate suggests. Americans are open to AI in domains where scale and pattern recognition matter, but much more reluctant where judgment, intimacy, or accountability are central. Pew found stronger support for AI playing at least some role in areas like weather forecasting and medical treatment development than in personal or spiritual decisions. The public instinct is not irrational. It is drawing a boundary between assistance and authority.

The Labor Market Is the Fault Line

Jobs are where that skepticism hardens into politics. Quinnipiac found that 70% of Americans believe advances in AI will reduce job opportunities overall, up sharply from 56% in 2025. Gen Z, despite being the most AI-fluent generation, is also the most pessimistic, with 81% expecting fewer jobs. A separate Pew survey of U.S. workers found 52% of workers are worried about AI in the workplace, and only 6% think it will create more opportunities for them personally in the long run.

Those fears are not proof that catastrophe is inevitable. The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025 projects major disruption by 2030, but also a net gain in jobs globally as new roles outnumber displaced ones. The OECD’s work on AI and employment makes a similar point: the gains are real, but they depend on policy, training, worker voice, and the way organizations deploy the technology.

That gap between aggregate promise and personal fear is the real governance problem. People are willing to believe that AI may raise productivity. They are much less willing to believe they will share fairly in the upside. If business leaders keep talking about efficiency while workers hear replacement, the backlash will not be philosophical. It will be electoral, legal, and local.

People Want AI as a Tool, Not a Ruler

The strongest signal in the Quinnipiac poll is that Americans want AI as a copilot, not a sovereign. Even if an AI system were proven more accurate than a human at reading medical scans, 81% would still prefer a combination of AI and human judgment. That instinct lines up with a new KFF tracking poll on AI for health information, which found one in three adults have used AI for health advice, even as large majorities worry about privacy and many still trust clinicians more. The FDA’s growing list of AI-enabled medical devices shows the technology is already entering care settings, but public acceptance still hinges on visible human accountability.

The same principle runs through work and governance. Quinnipiac found 80% of Americans would not want an AI program as their direct boss. It also found 74% think government is not doing enough to regulate AI and 76% think businesses are not being transparent enough about how they use it. The NIST AI Risk Management Framework offers a serious blueprint for trustworthy systems, but frameworks alone will not answer the public’s demand for enforceable rules, clear disclosures, and lines of responsibility.

Even the politics of infrastructure are shifting. Quinnipiac found 65% oppose building an AI data center in their community, with electricity cost and water use topping the reasons. That anxiety is not imagined. The International Energy Agency’s latest analysis says electricity demand from data centers is set to more than double by 2030. The concerns about water are much less valid, with the exception of some local areas with water scarcity, but the worry itself is what matters.

The public has delivered a coherent verdict. Americans will use AI. They may even rely on it. But they do not want to surrender judgment, employment, privacy, or community costs in exchange for convenience. The winners in the next phase of AI will not be the companies that merely scale fastest. They will be the ones that make the technology legible, accountable, and unmistakably subordinate to human control.

Key Take-Away

The real AI story is not AI replacing humans overnight; it’s people embracing AI as a tool while demanding transparency, accountability, and human control over decisions, jobs, privacy, and communities.… >Click to tweet

Image credit: Matheus Bertelli/pexels

Originally published in Disaster Avoidance Experts

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, called the “Office Whisperer” by The New York Times, helps tech-forward leaders stop overpaying for AI while boosting engagement and innovation. He serves as the CEO of the AI consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts. Dr. Gleb wrote seven best-selling books, and his forthcoming book with Georgetown University Press is The Psychology of Generative AI Adoption (2026). His most recent best-seller is ChatGPT for Leaders and Content Creators: Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI (Intentional Insights, 2023). His cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 650 articles and 550 interviews in Harvar d Business Review, Inc. Magazine, USA Today, CBS News, Fox News, Time, Business Insider, Fortune, The New York Times, and elsewhere. His writing was translated into Chinese, Spanish, Russian, Polish, Korean, French, Vietnamese, German, and other languages. His expertise comes from over 20 years of consulting, coaching, and speaking and training for Fortune 500 companies from Aflac to Xerox. It also comes from over 15 years in academia as a behavioral scientist, with 8 years as a lecturer at UNC-Chapel Hill and 7 years as a professor at Ohio State. A proud Ukrainian American, Dr. Gleb lives in Columbus, Ohio.

Business, Finance and Religion

About Dr. Gleb Tsipursky

Known as the Disaster Avoidance Expert, Dr. Gleb Tsipursky is on a mission to protect leaders from dangerous judgment errors known as cognitive biases, which devastate bottom lines and bring down high-flying careers. His expertise and passion is developing the most effective and profitable decision-making strategies, based on pragmatic business experience and cutting-edge behavioral economics and cognitive neuroscience, to empower leaders to avoid business disasters and maximize their bottom lines. You can learn more here https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/glebtsipursky/ The bestselling author of several books, Dr. Tsipursky is best known for his national bestseller on avoiding disasters and achieving success in business and other life areas, The Truth Seeker’s Handbook: A Science-Based Guide. His next book, Never Go With Your Gut: How Pioneering Leaders Make the Best Decisions and Avoid Business Disasters, is forthcoming with Career Press in November 2019. It’s the first book to focus on cognitive biases in business leadership and reveal how leaders can overcome these dangerous judgment errors effectively. After that he’s publishing The Blindspots Between Us: How to Overcome Unconscious Cognitive Bias and Build Better Relationships with New Harbinger in April 2020, the first book to focus on cognitive biases in professional and personal relationships and illustrate how we can defeat these dangerous judgment errors in our relationships. See more information here https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/author-page/ Dr. Tsipursky’s cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 400 articles he published and over 350 interviews he gave to popular venues that include Fast Company, CBS News, Time, Scientific American, Psychology Today, The Conversation, Business Insider, Government Executive, The Chronicle of Philanthropy, Inc. Magazine, and many others, as you can see here https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/media/ Dr. Tsipursky's expertise comes from over 20 years of consulting, coaching, speaking, and training for businesses and nonprofits. He serves as the CEO of the boutique consulting, coaching, and training firm Disaster Avoidance Experts, which uses a proprietary methodology based on groundbreaking research to help leaders and organizations maximize their bottom lines by addressing potential threats, seizing unexpected opportunities, and resolving persistent personnel problems. His clients include Aflac, Balance Employment Assistance Provider, Edison Welding Institute, Fifth Third Bank, Honda, IBM, International Coaches Federation, Ohio Hospitals Association, National Association of Women Business Owners, Sentinel Real Estate, The Society for Human Resource Management, RealManage, The Columbus Foundation, Vistage, Wells Fargo, the World Wildlife Fund, and over a hundred others who achieve outstanding client results. You can learn more about that here: https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/about Dr. Tsipursky also has a strong research and teaching background in behavioral economics and cognitive neuroscience with over 15 years in academia, including 7 years as a professor at the Ohio State University and before that a Fellow at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. His dozens of peer-reviewed academic publications include journals such as Behavior and Social Issues, Journal of Social and Political Psychology, and International Journal of Existential Psychology and Psychotherapy. His civic service includes over 4 years as the Chair of the Board of Directors of Intentional Insights, an educational nonprofit advocating for research-based decision-making in all life areas. He also co-founded the Pro-Truth Pledge, a civic project to promote truthfulness and integrity for individual professionals and leaders in the same way that the Better Business Bureau serves as a commitment for businesses. He serves on the Advisory Board of Canonical Debate Lab and Planet Purpose, and is on the Editorial Board of the peer-reviewed journal Behavior and Social Issues. A highly in-demand international speaker, Dr. Tsipursky has over two decades of professional speaking experience across North America, Europe, and Australia. He gets top marks from audiences for his highly facilitative, interactive, and humor-filled speaking style and the way he thoroughly customizes speeches for diverse audiences. Meeting planners describe Dr. Tsipursky as "very relatable," as "a snap to work with," and as someone who "does everything that you would want a speaker to do." Drawing on best practices in adult learning, his programs address the wide spectrum of diverse learning styles, as attested by enthusiastic client testimonials and references. He regularly shares the stage with prominent leaders, for example recently speaking on a roundtable panel with the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, Secretary General of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Elhadj As Sy, Chancellor of Austria Brigitte Bierlein, CEO of Penguin Random House Markus Dohle, and billionaire philanthropist and Chair of the Bertelsmann Management Company Liz Mohn. You can learn more about his speaking and see videos here: https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/speaking/ Dr. Tsipursky earned his PhD in the History of Behavioral Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2011, his M.A. at Harvard University in 2004, and his B.A. at New York University in 2002. He lives in and travels from Columbus, OH. In his free time, he enjoys tennis, hiking, and playing with his two cats, and most importantly, he makes sure to spend abundant quality time with his wife to avoid disasters in his personal life. Learn more about him at https://DisasterAvoidanceExperts.com/GlebTsipursky, contact him at Gleb[at]DisasterAvoidanceExperts[dot]com, follow him on Instagram @dr_gleb_tsipursky and Twitter @gleb_tsipursky. Most importantly, help yourself avoid disasters and maximize success, and get a free copy of the “Assessment on Dangerous Judgment Errors in the Workplace,” by signing up for his free Wise Decision Maker Course at https:// DisasterAvoidanceExperts.com/Subscribe You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

September 23, 2026

AI Job Diffusion Is Outrunning Every Tech Wave Before It

Which book of the Bible contains the most direct prophecies about the Messiah?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaiah Psalms Zechariah Micah