Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Nonreligious
Careers, Workplace and Religion
25 Times Cheaper: How AI Reprices Knowledge Work

25 Times Cheaper: How AI Reprices Knowledge Work

Last updated on: July 21, 2026 at 3:48 pm by Gleb Tsipursky

0 Comments

25 Times Cheaper: How AI Reprices Knowledge Work 2026-07-21T15:48:54-04:00 Gleb Tsipursky

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Reprices Knowledge Work

On a quarterly spend report, $10,000 that used to flow to a freelancer marketplace now shows up as a few hundred dollars of model usage tied to an expense platform dataset and a handful of vendor names that every CFO now recognizes. The shift looks small in a chart until you translate it into unit economics. Then it feels like a pricing shock that lands in the middle of knowledge work.

Ryan Stevens uses payments data from thousands of firms to track spending from Q3 2021 through Q3 2025, then treats the October 2022 release of ChatGPT as an adoption shock in a difference-in-differences design detailed in a Ramp research paper preprint on arXiv. The result delivers a hard ratio that leaders can apply to real budgets.

Twenty-Five Times Cheaper Changes Everything

Among the most exposed firms, each $1 decline in online labor marketplace spending lines up with about $0.03 of additional spending on AI model providers by Q3 2025, which implies roughly 20–25x cost savings when firms swap outsourced task labor for model usage. That single number deserves more attention than any headline about prompts replacing jobs because it captures the real mechanism that drives adoption inside companies: unit cost.

A 25x gap forces a new kind of budgeting conversation. Contract work typically scales linearly. More output requires more hours, more invoices, and more coordination time. Model usage scales through throughput. A manager pays for tokens and tooling, then pushes volume through a workflow that blends generation, review, and deployment. The spend looks like software spend, yet it often replaces labor spend in categories like copy drafts, first-pass research, support macros, lightweight coding scaffolds, and structured summaries.

Stevens’s dataset shows the spending mix changing alongside that ratio. The share of spending on online labor marketplaces falls sharply over time, while spending on AI model providers rises, reaching 2.85% by Q3 2025. Ramp also summarized the same pattern for a broader audience in its spending analysis, which helps connect the econometrics to what finance teams see in their own general ledger.

The ratio also explains why substitution looks gradual and then speeds up. Early usage often sits in pilots, sandboxes, and individual experimentation. Once a team builds a reliable loop for quality control, the economics pull the work toward AI like gravity. A workflow that turns a $2,000 contractor assignment into $80 of model usage will spread across departments fast. That same math becomes even more compelling when teams pair models with retrieval, templates, and evaluation, because the marginal cost stays low while quality rises.

The bigger point for leaders sits behind the decimal. Three cents on the dollar changes pricing power in every market where language and analysis drive value. It changes how agencies price retainers. It changes how startups staff early functions. It changes how enterprises think about shared services. The labor market reacts to wages and unemployment with a lag. Accounts payable reacts the moment a manager reroutes spend.

The Iceberg Below The Spend Data

The paper captures the visible tip of the iceberg because it measures what firms pay externally through online labor marketplaces and AI model providers in a payments platform. The deeper mass sits underwater inside payroll budgets, internal teams, and embedded contractors that never show up as Upwork or Fiverr line items. In my work with companies adopting generative AI, I keep seeing the same cost curve play out in those internal budgets, where leaders redirect effort rather than cancel a marketplace contract. The savings show up as slower hiring, smaller backfills, shorter project timelines, and fewer outsourced hours in categories that procurement never labeled as “freelance marketplace spend.”

This matters for interpretation. A $1 to $0.03 substitution ratio in a narrow spend category signals a broader capability shift that reaches far beyond the measured slice. The ratio captures direct replacement of purchased task labor. The iceberg includes internal task compression, where one analyst finishes in an afternoon what used to take a week because the model handles the first pass and the human focuses on judgment.

Research on task exposure helps explain why the underwater portion grows quickly. The OpenAI and University of Pennsylvania team behind a recent research paper estimates that about 80% of the U.S. workforce has at least 10% of tasks exposed to LLM capabilities, and about 19% has at least 50% exposure, which frames how wide the potential surface area is. When exposure spreads across roles, substitution can occur through workflow redesign even when the company keeps headcount steady.

Once leaders view the iceberg clearly, the operational priorities sharpen. Finance teams track spend share, yet they also track throughput metrics that reveal internal task compression. HR teams redesign entry roles toward evaluation and domain context. Procurement teams negotiate usage governance and data handling terms with model vendors. Public-sector guidance increasingly treats these capabilities as general-purpose technologies that require management capacity, as emphasized in the OECD’s work on AI adoption in firms.

The iceberg metaphor also clarifies why public debate often feels behind. A marketplace invoice disappearing creates a clean story. A team that quietly ships twice as much with the same headcount creates a subtle story that still drives real labor demand shifts downstream.

A Labor Market Repriced In Real Time

A 20–25x unit cost advantage pushes a repricing of work that touches every layer of the labor market, from gig platforms to entry-level pipelines to professional services. Work that maps cleanly to predictable language output faces direct demand pressure, while complementary work that involves evaluation, domain nuance, and integration gains value.

The most immediate effects show up where tasks are modular and buyers already treat labor as on-demand. A recent platform strategy working paper reports a meaningful decline in job posts for automation-prone categories, including a 21% drop in job posts for automation-prone work in the analysis presented in platform demand shifts. Those movements align with the Stevens finding because they share the same driver: buyers can buy output quality at a far lower unit price.

The next layer hits early-career roles that historically served as training grounds for higher-skill judgment. Stanford researchers using ADP payroll data report that early-career workers ages 22–25 in highly exposed occupations experienced a 16% relative employment decline after the widespread adoption of generative AI, even after controlling for firm-level shocks, as described in their research. That finding fits the iceberg dynamic. Firms gain the first-pass productivity from models, then reserve the remaining human work for people who already hold domain context, trust, and accountability.

Over time, the labor market will adapt through new task bundles. Companies will hire fewer people for pure drafting and more people for evaluation, customer nuance, and system building. Education and training will shift toward model supervision, data stewardship, and applied domain reasoning. Wage premia will flow toward roles that combine judgment with tool mastery, and toward roles that create proprietary feedback loops that raise quality. The same exposure research that highlights breadth also hints at productivity upside when tasks run faster at similar quality.

The Stevens ratio brings discipline to all of this. Leaders do not need to guess whether substitution exists. A three-cent-on-the-dollar signature in real payments data shows it already happening at scale in a measurable slice of the economy. The iceberg view suggests the larger change sits inside internal workflows, where the ledger records outcomes in slower hiring and higher throughput rather than clean vendor swaps.

Conclusion

The most important labor-market statistic in the generative AI era may be a ratio hidden in payments data: $1 of contracted online labor giving way to about $0.03 of model spend among the most exposed firms by Q3 2025 in Stevens’s estimate. That ratio explains why adoption persists even when quality debates continue, because buyers follow unit economics when they can protect output standards through review and governance.

The broader implications extend beyond freelancer marketplaces. The spending shift in the paper captures a visible sliver of substitution. The larger iceberg includes internal task compression, delayed hiring, and redesigned junior roles that reshape career ladders. Companies that treat this as a workforce redesign opportunity, with clear governance and strong training, will convert three-cent inputs into premium outputs. Everyone else will watch their cost structure get repriced by competitors who already did the math.

Key Take-Away

Generative AI reprices knowledge work by turning tasks that once required costly outsourced labor into low-cost model-driven workflows, reshaping hiring, budgeting, and productivity across industries… >Click to tweet

Image credit: AlphaTradeZone/pexels

Originally published in Disaster Avoidance Experts

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky, called the “Office Whisperer” by The New York Times, helps tech-forward leaders stop overpaying for AI while boosting engagement and innovation. He serves as the CEO of the AI consultancy Disaster Avoidance Experts. Dr. Gleb wrote seven best-selling books, and his forthcoming book with Georgetown University Press is The Psychology of Generative AI Adoption (2026). His most recent best-seller is ChatGPT for Leaders and Content Creators: Unlocking the Potential of Generative AI (Intentional Insights, 2023). His cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 650 articles and 550 interviews in Harvard Business Review, Inc. Magazine, USA Today, CBS News, Fox News, Time, Business Insider, Fortune, The New York Times, and el sewhere. His writing was translated into Chinese, Spanish, Russian, Polish, Korean, French, Vietnamese, German, and other languages. His expertise comes from over 20 years of consulting, coaching, and speaking and training for Fortune 500 companies from Aflac to Xerox. It also comes from over 15 years in academia as a behavioral scientist, with 8 years as a lecturer at UNC-Chapel Hill and 7 years as a professor at Ohio State. A proud Ukrainian American, Dr. Gleb lives in Columbus, Ohio.

Business, Finance and Religion

Reprices Knowledge Work

wise decision maker

About Dr. Gleb Tsipursky

Known as the Disaster Avoidance Expert, Dr. Gleb Tsipursky is on a mission to protect leaders from dangerous judgment errors known as cognitive biases, which devastate bottom lines and bring down high-flying careers. His expertise and passion is developing the most effective and profitable decision-making strategies, based on pragmatic business experience and cutting-edge behavioral economics and cognitive neuroscience, to empower leaders to avoid business disasters and maximize their bottom lines. You can learn more here https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/glebtsipursky/ The bestselling author of several books, Dr. Tsipursky is best known for his national bestseller on avoiding disasters and achieving success in business and other life areas, The Truth Seeker’s Handbook: A Science-Based Guide. His next book, Never Go With Your Gut: How Pioneering Leaders Make the Best Decisions and Avoid Business Disasters, is forthcoming with Career Press in November 2019. It’s the first book to focus on cognitive biases in business leadership and reveal how leaders can overcome these dangerous judgment errors effectively. After that he’s publishing The Blindspots Between Us: How to Overcome Unconscious Cognitive Bias and Build Better Relationships with New Harbinger in April 2020, the first book to focus on cognitive biases in professional and personal relationships and illustrate how we can defeat these dangerous judgment errors in our relationships. See more information here https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/author-page/ Dr. Tsipursky’s cutting-edge thought leadership was featured in over 400 articles he published and over 350 interviews he gave to popular venues that include Fast Company, CBS News, Time, Scientific American, Psychology Today, The Conversation, Business Insider, Government Executive, The Chronicle of Philanthropy, Inc. Magazine, and many others, as you can see here https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/media/ Dr. Tsipursky's expertise comes from over 20 years of consulting, coaching, speaking, and training for businesses and nonprofits. He serves as the CEO of the boutique consulting, coaching, and training firm Disaster Avoidance Experts, which uses a proprietary methodology based on groundbreaking research to help leaders and organizations maximize their bottom lines by addressing potential threats, seizing unexpected opportunities, and resolving persistent personnel problems. His clients include Aflac, Balance Employment Assistance Provider, Edison Welding Institute, Fifth Third Bank, Honda, IBM, International Coaches Federation, Ohio Hospitals Association, National Association of Women Business Owners, Sentinel Real Estate, The Society for Human Resource Management, RealManage, The Columbus Foundation, Vistage, Wells Fargo, the World Wildlife Fund, and over a hundred others who achieve outstanding client results. You can learn more about that here: https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/about Dr. Tsipursky also has a strong research and teaching background in behavioral economics and cognitive neuroscience with over 15 years in academia, including 7 years as a professor at the Ohio State University and before that a Fellow at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. His dozens of peer-reviewed academic publications include journals such as Behavior and Social Issues, Journal of Social and Political Psychology, and International Journal of Existential Psychology and Psychotherapy. His civic service includes over 4 years as the Chair of the Board of Directors of Intentional Insights, an educational nonprofit advocating for research-based decision-making in all life areas. He also co-founded the Pro-Truth Pledge, a civic project to promote truthfulness and integrity for individual professionals and leaders in the same way that the Better Business Bureau serves as a commitment for businesses. He serves on the Advisory Board of Canonical Debate Lab and Planet Purpose, and is on the Editorial Board of the peer-reviewed journal Behavior and Social Issues. A highly in-demand international speaker, Dr. Tsipursky has over two decades of professional speaking experience across North America, Europe, and Australia. He gets top marks from audiences for his highly facilitative, interactive, and humor-filled speaking style and the way he thoroughly customizes speeches for diverse audiences. Meeting planners describe Dr. Tsipursky as "very relatable," as "a snap to work with," and as someone who "does everything that you would want a speaker to do." Drawing on best practices in adult learning, his programs address the wide spectrum of diverse learning styles, as attested by enthusiastic client testimonials and references. He regularly shares the stage with prominent leaders, for example recently speaking on a roundtable panel with the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen, Secretary General of the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies Elhadj As Sy, Chancellor of Austria Brigitte Bierlein, CEO of Penguin Random House Markus Dohle, and billionaire philanthropist and Chair of the Bertelsmann Management Company Liz Mohn. You can learn more about his speaking and see videos here: https://disasteravoidanceexperts.com/speaking/ Dr. Tsipursky earned his PhD in the History of Behavioral Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in 2011, his M.A. at Harvard University in 2004, and his B.A. at New York University in 2002. He lives in and travels from Columbus, OH. In his free time, he enjoys tennis, hiking, and playing with his two cats, and most importantly, he makes sure to spend abundant quality time with his wife to avoid disasters in his personal life. Learn more about him at https://DisasterAvoidanceExperts.com/GlebTsipursky, contact him at Gleb[at]DisasterAvoidanceExperts[dot]com, follow him on Instagram @dr_gleb_tsipursky and Twitter @gleb_tsipursky. Most importantly, help yourself avoid disasters and maximize success, and get a free copy of the “Assessment on Dangerous Judgment Errors in the Workplace,” by signing up for his free Wise Decision Maker Course at https:// DisasterAvoidanceExperts.com/Subscribe You can read more about the author here.

Previous Post

July 8, 2026

AI Is Making the One-Person Creative Studio a Reality

Next Post

August 5, 2026 Forget Algorithms—Gen AI Feedback Is the Real Advantage

I appeared to Paul on the Damascus road as a blinding light. I spoke to him and changed his life forever. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jesus God the Father The Holy Spirit An angel