Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Nonreligious
Careers, Workplace and Religion
How to Avoid Business Disasters with Behavioral Science (by Gleb Tsipursky)

How to Avoid Business Disasters with Behavioral Science (by Gleb Tsipursky)

Last updated on: August 16, 2018 at 11:19 am by Gleb Tsipursky

How to Avoid Business Disasters with Behavioral Science (by Gleb Tsipursky) 2018-08-16T11:19:55-04:00 Gleb Tsipursky

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Caption: Sad business woman (pxhere)

Facebook’s Cambridge Analytica data breach scandal led to a massive fall in the Facebook’s stock price, governments around the world discussing new regulations, commenters from the left and the right calling for breaking up Facebook, multiple lawsuits, and many people leaving Facebook. After three recent incidents with pets on United Airlines, the company’s favorability rating fell and customers who heard about the incidents were significantly more likely to choose another airline. Equifax is in the news – again – for discovering an additional 2.4 million victims of its data breach.

You might be surprised to learn that all of these business disasters were avoidable, as are many disasters suffered by medium and small businesses that don’t make it into the news. Our brains make systematic and predictable errors – what behavioral scientists call cognitive biases – that lead business leaders to make poor decisions. Fortunately, recent research shows that we can easily improve our ability to make better decisions. As a behavioral science expert and consultant and speaker on business decision-making and author of an Amazon bestseller on this topic, The Truth-Seeker’s Handbook: A Science-Based Guide, I want to suggest an effective, research-based approach that business leaders can use to avoid disasters.

Were These Disasters Really Avoidable?

The CEOs of all three companies acknowledged that they – and their organizations – made errors that led to the business disasters. Facebook’s CEO Mark Zuckerberg acknowledged that Facebook made many mistakes, such as allowing external apps to have massive data access to Facebook users, trusting the word of Cambridge Analytica and other companies about what they do with the data, and failing to inform Facebook users about how their data is used.

Oscar Munoz, United’s CEO, also acknowledged that United got it wrong. He committed to changing not simply the way United transports pets, but putting United crews through a new program focused on “safety, caring, dependability and efficiency.” Equifax’s former CEO Richard Smith – who was forced to retire after the data breach – apologized for the failure of Equifax to follow its own policies and procedures. Apparently, after the Department of Homeland Security warned Equifax of its vulnerability, the company failed to follow its own process and fix the security flaw, enabling hackers to access the data of over 140 million customers.

Why Do Businesses Suffer Avoidable Disasters?

Avoidable business disasters frequently stem from three major cognitive biases: overconfidence effect, optimism bias, and planning fallacy.

When asked whether they are more, less, or equally skilled compared to the average driver, 93% of Americans report themselves as more skilled. When study subjects said they were 100% confident in their answers, they were wrong 20% of the time. No wonder that the overconfidence effect – our tendency to be excessively confident in our decision-making – has been found by researchers to harm business performance, whether by CEOs or ordinary investors. Indeed, Zuckerberg describes how he was wrong in being confident that Facebook users prefer to be more public with their data for the sake of more opportunities for social engagement.

Optimism bias refers to us being excessively optimistic about the future. For example, studies show we tend to believe our risk of suffering negative events is less than it actually is, and we overestimate the likelihood of positive events. Business leaders fall into optimism bias frequently, overemphasizing the benefits of projects and understating the costs. A related bias, the planning fallacy refers to our tendency to assume our plans will go perfectly, and fail to build in enough resources for potential problems. As a result, business endeavors tend to go over budget and over time. Both United and Equifax were excessively optimistic about their existing processes, the first in dealing with pets and the second in fixing the security flaw after it was found.

Addressing Avoidable Business Disasters With Behavioral Science

Facebook, United, and Equifax have been evaluating what went wrong and how they should fix it, an approach called a postmortem. To prevent these disasters, they could have used a technique known as a premortem. This approach, which has been shown by research to address cognitive biases that lead to business disasters, involves evaluating in advance what can go wrong with a project or process and coming up with solutions to foreseeable problems.

To conduct a premortem, first gather a team of relevant stakeholders, consisting of a mix of people with decision-making authority and expertise in the matter under evaluation. Then, ask everyone to imagine that the project or process definitely failed. Ask everyone to write out anonymously some plausible reasons for why the it failed, ranging from internal problems within the organization to external events. Encourage participants to focus particularly on reasons they would not typically bring up because it would be seen as rude or impolitic, such as criticizing someone’s competency, or even dangerous to one’s career, such as criticizing the organization’s strategy.

Next, the facilitator would gather the statements, and bring out common themes, especially ones that might not be typically brought up. The participants would discuss the potential reasons for failure, and assess – once again anonymously – the likelihood of each reason for failure. Following that, the stakeholders would brainstorm solutions for failures, and consider possible next steps for implementing these solutions to revise the project or process as needed.

Premortems conducted regularly to evaluate existing processes could have caught the kind of issues that led to disasters for United and Equifax. They can also be conducted in response to potential problems, such as when Facebook found out in 2015 that Cambridge Analytica got data improperly, and failed to take meaningful steps to address the problem, despite being warned by regulators in 2011. Any business leader – from a CEO of a Fortune 500 company to a small business owner – can conduct premortems regularly on existing processes and before launching new projects to avoid business disasters.

Bio:

Dr. Gleb Tsipursky serves as the volunteer President of the nonprofit Intentional Insights and is a co-founder of the Pro-Truth Pledge. He authored a number of a number of books, most notably the #1 Amazon bestseller The Truth Seeker’s Handbook: A Science-Based Guide, and is regularly featured in venues like CBS News, Time, Scientific American, Psychology Today, Newsweek, The Conversation, CNBC, and elsewhere.

__________________________________________________________________

Connect with Dr. Gleb Tsipursky on Twitter, on Facebook, and on LinkedIn, and learn more about him on his website.

Previous Post

July 5, 2018

(Dis)Trust in Science: What Can We Do About the Scourge of Misinformation?

Next Post

August 21, 2018 Does the Starbucks Anti-Bias Training Go Against Human Nature?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Alternative Facts Behavioral Science Cognitive Bias Debates Deception Decision Making Donald Trump Effective giving Fake news Leadership Meaning and Purpose Personal Politics Post-Truth Pro-Truth Pro-Truth Pledge Psychology Rationality Secular Spirituality Uncategorized Wise decision Making

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 January 2023 December 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animal did Peter see in vision?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Sheep Clean and unclean animals Goats Lions