Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Samuel D. James

The Trouble With Facebook

Last updated on: September 16, 2015 at 8:33 am   by Samuel James

The Trouble With Facebook 2015-09-16T08:33:50-04:00 Samuel James

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

FacebookThe other day I remarked to Emily that Facebook has become useful for essentially only two things: Seeing other people’s photos, and sharing links. It seems that every time I log into Facebook, at least for the past couple years, what I get can almost totally be classified as either a photo or a link to something off Facebook. Sometimes those links are of a personal nature, but most of the time they’re not. Pictures I would classify as probably 60% family/baby pictures, 30% “activity” pictures (“here’s what I’m eating/doing/reading right now”) 10% miscellanea.

The reason this is interesting to me is that I’ve now been on Facebook for 8 years (minus about a year off the site from 2010-2011), and I’ve been able to watch as, progressively, it has become less and less of an actual “social network” and more of a kind of digital bazaar. I realized that not only am I not more connected to more classmates, coworkers, and friends for having had Facebook for 8 years–I’m actually less connected than I might be, had I not farmed out many of my casual relationships to Facebook.

Around 2009 or 2010 probably marks the zenith of my use of Facebook. I used the site seriously every day, to the point that it often became a problematic distraction in my daily life (this was before iPhone, so checking Facebook required a computer and a chair). The reason I used it so seriously was that I was, in a very real sense, conducting an entirely separate genre of relationships through it. I talked regularly to “friends” whose families I’d never met and whose birthdays I only knew because of Facebook’s helpful reminders. I had intimate personal conversations with people I’d not physically shared a space with in months or years. And none of that was especially disappointing because the Facebook relationship matrix was a self-contained one. Getting a “like” from someone, or “liking” their status or photo, was its own kind of social currency. A wall post (this was when Facebook still had walls, and not the ridiculous “timeline”) was much better than a “Like” because it was personal and not as mindless; the other person had to single me out to do it.

I’m sure that part of this was the immaturity of those years and the combination of various personal chaoses that made me vulnerable to impersonal-yet-emotional relationships. But here’s the thing: While I was in the middle of the Facebook relationship matrix, I was perfectly content to live without the serious stuff of live, interpersonal friendship. I didn’t need to really know anybody; I only needed to know their Facebook. The success of Facebook depends, as the film The Social Network makes clear, on selling users on the idea of a “digital self,” a cyber-identity that digitizes personality. But this cyber self is created and cultivated through real actions; ergo, Facebook’s usefulness is more or less dependent on how much time you’re willing to give it. If you post a lot of updates, you’ll get more feedback. If you take time to add filters and flattering angles to your photos, you’ll get more “Likes.” And if you constrain your investment in the lives of others to social media, you’ll feel “closer” to them online.

And yet, 5 years after becoming a certified pro in Facebook, many of those friends whom I felt closest to online have fallen out of contact altogether. Life has pushed aside social media, and with it, both the motivation and mechanisms of friendship. Thing is, I’m not lonely; I’ve been married for 3 1/2 months, been a member of a new church for 8 months, and have lots of family and friends close by. But that’s actually what worries me. The kind of loss of “friendship” that I’ve had with Facebook friends hasn’t felt lonely at all. How can losing touch with people to whom I shared many deep conversations and memorable life experiences feel like not much loss at all?

I’m afraid that’s how Facebook works. The digital self can feel intensely real at times, but in the end it is still a digital self. And that’s the trouble with Facebook. It’s become a useful place to share links and funny images, to be sure. But there is certainly a part of me that wonders if too many hours to count were wasted putting coins into its relational claw machine game, trying to get something that sticks. If I could travel back in time, I’d stop on my way to the American Revolution in 2009, and tell myself to log off and go have a coffee.

life

pop culture

Facebook

relationships

social media

Previous Post



September 15, 2015

The Screwtape Secrets to Planned Parenthood P.R.

Next Post



September 16, 2015 Going to Church, Skipping Donald Trump


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abortion bible books Christianity Current events DVD of the Week education Essays Ethics Fun Liberal Christianity life Mailbag Monday media Movies My Essential Movies philosophy Politics pop culture Quotes religion Southern Baptist Convention sports theology Uncategorized video Weekend Roundup

Select a Month October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 November 2013


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who built the temple in Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Solomon David Abraham Moses

Related posts from Samuel D. James

Evangelical

Loving Our Movies Well In the Golden Age...

Samuel D. James

Evangelical

Wanted: Journalists Not Beholden to Planned Parenthood

Samuel D. James

Evangelical

The Problem of "Problematic"

Samuel D. James

Evangelical

The Phantom Females of Ashley Madison

Samuel D. James

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

How the author of the world's best hymn...

I've been working with John Newton for a while now. This makes...

Psalm 130 | Lectio Divina

Long before this Lectio Divina, Psalm 130 - the song - started...

What About the Trees? Another Living Parable

After I finished writing the last article about falling leaves as a...

Why Classical Education Is a Conversation, Not a...

Come and Read: Joy in Classical Education When I was a little...

Falling Leaves: A Living Parable on Letting Go

I’ve spent the vast majority of my life in the southeast corner...

What Happened at Cornell?

Cornell University has received a great deal of negative publicity and intense...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube