Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Inebriate Me

Courtly Love And “The Traditional Family”

Last updated on: January 21, 2015 at 4:53 pm   by Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry

Courtly Love And “The Traditional Family” 2015-01-21T16:53:27+01:00 Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Der_Garten_der_Lüste_-_Christus,_Adam_und_Eva

Over the Christmas break, I read C.S. Lewis’s The Allegory of Love (my first Lewis book! I enjoyed it!), a wonderful book of literary history and criticism, which looks at the invention of the poetry genre of “courtly love”, which is really the invention of what we would today call romantic love, period.

One of the things Lewis is at pains to stress in his book is that the very notion of romantic, or passionate, love, or however you want to call it, was basically alien to all culture until the 11th century when Provençal poets created it. And the extent to which the notion has been popular is positively astonishing, given that it is essentially impossible for us to imagine life without it, and without it as a central part of every life (if only as an absence, or a longing, or a rejection) and of human flourishing. So, yes, if someone asks, it’s true: French people invented love.

Lewis refuses to credit Christianity directly with this invention of romantic love, but I can’t help but believe (and I don’t think Lewis would very much disagree) that such a notion could only have appeared, and certainly only flourished, in a culture whose imagination had been profoundly shaped by the Christian symphony–starting with the idea that the very ground of existence is love, a love that is willing to go through death and Hell and back if need be.

This might, and perhaps should, give Christians an occasion to boast, but it’s also worth noting another aspect of the courtly love genre: in the original courtly love drama, romantic love can only be adulterous love. Marriage is arranged, and is entered into for sociopolitical reasons, and so romantic, passionate love can only appear between a wife and an unmarried knight. Church authorities, understandably enough though short-sightedly, reacted to the courtly love dramas with horror: an apology of adultery!

And this is really an encapsulation (there are many others) of the bittersweet flavor of the history of the Christian drama. On the one hand, there are tremendous accomplishments, the irresistible and fantastic results of the astonishing Christian cultural revolution–the invention of love!–but there is a reminder of the extent to which Christianity was left untried. Even in the thoroughly christianized (or not thoroughly, that is the point) society of the Middle Ages, “Christian marriage” actually had very little “Christian” about it: it was still mostly, at least for the nobility, a natural affair of estate and social status, not the icon of the Trinitarian perichoresis that Christian theology tells us it should be.

This is why I so often cringe when I hear talk of “traditional marriage.” What was Christian about “traditional marriage”? Not as much as we would like.

If we’re going to debate “the family” (and we must), then we must put forward a vision that is about more than turning back the clock to some imagined prelapsarian state, a vision that is more Christian than “traditional marriage.”

(Another important aspect of courtly love is its scripted character. We live in a society that desperately needs new relationship scripts, and I think there is a mine here.)

Uncategorized

Previous Post



January 15, 2015

Examining A Proposal On Orthodox-Catholic Unity

Next Post



January 22, 2015 Papal Infallibility As An Instrument Of Unity


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Elsewhere Mary New Distributism Parish of PEG Synod for the Famiy Theology of Women Uncategorized What I'm Reading

Select a Month June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What were Jesus' followers called?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Prophets Judges Shepherds Disciples

Related posts from Inebriate Me

Catholic

Why I Remain Catholic

Inebriate Me

Catholic

A Quick Note About What An Anathema Does...

Inebriate Me

Catholic

When All Earthly Hopes Fade, That Old-Time Religion...

Inebriate Me

Catholic

The Religion-Gospel Dichotomy

Inebriate Me

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Creation, Preservation, and Teleology in Catholic Theology

As I write this, it is very early Monday morning. Like millions...

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube